Speaker to Animals wrote:Part of the problem is that I need to start thinking of most of these people as victims of ideological subversion rather than committed opponents. There certainly exist people committed to destroying our civilization, which includes making whites in the western world a minority. But most of these people we deal with here are simply programmed by decades of television, film, and other media constantly reinforcing cultural Marxism. The goal probably should shift more towards undoing the programming than debating them. I am unsure how to do that, though.
And I here I thought you didn't realize that. Incompetence/Ignorance is a better explanation for most of the extremist ideological opponents holding the view that they do, than "they know everything I know, and yet are committed to destroying civilization" does. Looks like you are becoming a little more self aware, realizing you aren't the best at assuming incompetence over evil, when in doubt.
Most people who support cultural marxism don't even realize how dangerous it is, they think they are supporting good, not evil. They assume that the only reason anyone would disagree with them is because they sympathize with oppressors and don't care about the oppressed.
They think the other side is evil, not their side. Backwards rationalization, it's a thing humans do, including cultural marxists. Very few people who support policies that are evil actually realize that's what they are doing and support it anyway, that's not how most humans operate, they see themselves as the hero of the movie, not the villain, but the road to hell is paved with good intentions.
Good intentions do not always lead to good outcomes, and having good intentions doesn't make you immune from paving to the path to hell. Protip for the lefties.
When you start viewing most of the left through the "well intentioned, but extremely misguided" lens, their actions begin to make a whole lot more sense. Their heart is usually in the right place, their head, not so much.