A Graceless coup
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: A Graceless coup
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: A Graceless coup
I can't wait for the NYT article that blames white people for all the starving people in Zimbabwe. It'll be great fun.
-
- Posts: 563
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 1:30 pm
Re: A Graceless coup
Anyone buy one of those trillion Zimbabwe dollar notes from Amazon?
"Stone walls do not a prison make, nor iron bars a cage...
If I have freedom in my love
And in my soul am free,
Angels alone that soar above
Enjoy such Liberty" - Richard Lovelace
If I have freedom in my love
And in my soul am free,
Angels alone that soar above
Enjoy such Liberty" - Richard Lovelace
-
- Posts: 7571
- Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2017 7:54 pm
Re: A Graceless coup
I have a 100 trillion dollar note that I got as a gag gift r/tkatarn wrote:Anyone buy one of those trillion Zimbabwe dollar notes from Amazon?
Shikata ga nai
-
- Posts: 7978
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm
Re: A Graceless coup
That is not being a good SJW ally. You support white Supremacy!Montegriffo wrote:Ousting Mugabe is a bloody good start. His 40 year reign has impoverished a once great African nation. He took land away from white farmers who had spent generations building a successful agriculture and gave it to his civil war budies who wrecked it overnight.
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: A Graceless coup
Montegriffo wrote:White power!
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: A Graceless coup
It is possible to defend white farmers whilst disagreeing with minority white rule.Speaker to Animals wrote:Montegriffo wrote:White power!
Sorry to blow your monochrome mind.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: A Graceless coup
I am just messing with you, man.Montegriffo wrote:It is possible to defend white farmers whilst disagreeing with minority white rule.Speaker to Animals wrote:Montegriffo wrote:White power!
Sorry to blow your monochrome mind.
But the problem with hypocrisy here is that the left decried what happened in Rhodesia and South Africa as "colonization" that had to be stopped while they defend colonization against white nations. You can't have it both ways.
I could literally requote those virtua signaling posts against me in the context of American immigration policy and apply it to Rhodesia. But I don't think the people making those arguments would be happy about that because white people doing it seems to be "different".
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: A Graceless coup
Difference being that the minority white colonists had total power over the indiginous majority in Zimbabwe and South Africa while the minority black immigrants in Western nations had very little power and were literally slaves at one point in time. Calling it colonisation is disingenuous at best.Speaker to Animals wrote:I am just messing with you, man.Montegriffo wrote:It is possible to defend white farmers whilst disagreeing with minority white rule.Speaker to Animals wrote:
Sorry to blow your monochrome mind.
But the problem with hypocrisy here is that the left decried what happened in Rhodesia and South Africa as "colonization" that had to be stopped while they defend colonization against white nations. You can't have it both ways.
I could literally requote those virtua signaling posts against me in the context of American immigration policy and apply it to Rhodesia. But I don't think the people making those arguments would be happy about that because white people doing it seems to be "different".
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.