-
The Conservative
- Posts: 14797
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am
Post
by The Conservative » Mon Oct 02, 2017 11:53 am
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Guns don't transport people to work...
Cars and Guns, when used for violence or by accident or other reasons, are 100% responsible for deaths.
Or is it really user error?
#NotOneRedCent
-
Speaker to Animals
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Post
by Speaker to Animals » Mon Oct 02, 2017 11:57 am
Nukedog wrote:I lost all my guns in a boating accident officer
Some dindus stole mine. Sorry.
-
C-Mag
- Posts: 28305
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm
Post
by C-Mag » Mon Oct 02, 2017 11:59 am
The Conservative wrote:C-Mag wrote:The Conservative wrote:2015:
Est. 300 Million guns owned.
Try X2, in civilian hands
Per number of guns, in the US you are the least likely to get killed with guns.
The last estimate was 300 Million, I'm only going by "verifiable statistics".
I know. But the official number is laughable. And if you do the math from when they started keeping gun sales numbers in like 1995, the number really look bad. More accurately you can say, 300 Million guns were sold in the US in the last 20 years through registered FFA license holders.
We have small population flyover states with more guns than large European countries, even using the Bad Math of the Government. This is why I say, safest place to be.
PLATA O PLOMO
Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience
-
Montegriffo
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Post
by Montegriffo » Mon Oct 02, 2017 12:04 pm
Cars have layer upon layer of restrictions on their use to try to improve road safety. Any talk of restrictions on gun ownership and everybody starts panicking about their constitutional rights being eroded.
Are rapid firing large magazine rifles really necessary to ensure the 2nd amendment or could you live without them and make this sort of massacre virtually impossible for a lone shooter to carry out.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
Speaker to Animals
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Post
by Speaker to Animals » Mon Oct 02, 2017 12:05 pm
Gun violence generally is a Democrat on Democrat problem.
-
C-Mag
- Posts: 28305
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm
Post
by C-Mag » Mon Oct 02, 2017 12:09 pm
Montegriffo wrote:Cars have layer upon layer of restrictions on their use to try to improve road safety. Any talk of restrictions on gun ownership and everybody starts panicking about their constitutional rights being eroded.
Are rapid firing large magazine rifles really necessary to ensure the 2nd amendment or could you live without them and make this sort of massacre virtually impossible for a lone shooter to carry out.
Yes, it is the price of Liberty. Remember our founders were OK with private citizens having Artillery and Battle Ships of their day, with enough firepower to level entire cities.
We ban guns, then we ban knives, then what ? I ask, because you are going through it.
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/4040279/s ... crackdown/
Last edited by C-Mag on Mon Oct 02, 2017 12:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.
PLATA O PLOMO
Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience
-
kybkh
- Posts: 2826
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 8:33 am
Post
by kybkh » Mon Oct 02, 2017 12:10 pm
>>Banned Guns
“I've got a phone that allows me to convene Americans from every walk of life, nonprofits, businesses, the private sector, universities to try to bring more and more Americans together around what I think is a unifying theme..." - Obama
-
C-Mag
- Posts: 28305
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm
Post
by C-Mag » Mon Oct 02, 2017 12:10 pm
Speaker to Animals wrote:Gun violence generally is a Democrat on Democrat problem.
That is a highly Statistically Accurate Statement .
PLATA O PLOMO
Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience
-
Speaker to Animals
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Post
by Speaker to Animals » Mon Oct 02, 2017 12:15 pm
C-Mag wrote:Montegriffo wrote:Cars have layer upon layer of restrictions on their use to try to improve road safety. Any talk of restrictions on gun ownership and everybody starts panicking about their constitutional rights being eroded.
Are rapid firing large magazine rifles really necessary to ensure the 2nd amendment or could you live without them and make this sort of massacre virtually impossible for a lone shooter to carry out.
Yes, it is the price of Liberty. Remember our founders were OK with private citizens having Artillery and Battle Ships of their day, with enough firepower to level entire cities.
We ban guns, then we ban knives, then what ? I ask, because you are going through it.
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/4040279/s ... crackdown/
They did walk that back a little after Edward Teach shelled Charleston from the harbor.
At least with respect to personally-owned warships; a.k.a. pirate ships.
Last edited by Speaker to Animals on Mon Oct 02, 2017 12:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
TheReal_ND
- Posts: 26035
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:23 pm
Post
by TheReal_ND » Mon Oct 02, 2017 12:32 pm
Let's remove suicides and black on black crime and review the numbers shall we?