No critique. I like the podcast. If anything, it's a little hard to follow his thesis, because it goes so far back and forth.Haumana wrote:I read it. Dunno, it just seems you are conflating his education and luck with his ideology. What, ideologically speaking, has he offered that would make him an elitist according to the definition I provided? You may have a different definition of the term and by sharing it would help in understanding your critique.GrumpyCatFace wrote:Dude. Paragraph 10. Where he's talking about the MSM and talking heads going after Trump. They're called out as "college-educated elitists".Haumana wrote:
Elitist
noun
1.a person who believes that a society or system should be led by an elite.
After listening to his podcasts, I guess you could make that case if you consider the top 25% elites. But that seems a bit watered down.
I guess the terms elitist and elites mean something else to me. Being educated, ambitious and fortunate doesn't automatically equate to the definition I provided and currently understand the term to mean. *shrug
I'm just saying that doesn't make any sense coming from a guy with multiple doctorates, who retired 20 years ago.
That term just struck me as really odd coming from him. It's used to rally the "non-elites", and it smacks of manipulation, when coming from an elite.