California wrote:
There's no way that's real
California wrote:
California wrote:
I knew a girl that collected daddies. She had quite an impressive drug problem, although I don't know if she got any gov't assistance besides EBT. Kids are so fucking expensive. How much welfare do you get per kid as a single mom? Even between that and the child support I still don't think from an economic standpoint it makes sense but idk.Speaker to Animals wrote:California wrote:
This stuff is really common amongst non-college educated millennial women. They have few career options opened to them in life, their SMV runs out in their mid-twenties, and they usually already have one baby out of wedlock, which gets them hooked on all the welfare.
In a way, I don't really blame them. If your choice is between being a single mom and serving tables at IHOP for the rest of your life.. that's not really a choice. Most women just want to be moms anyway, and the degenerate culture sabotaged their ability to pair bond and ruined their suitability for marriage very early on. But because we subsidize single mothers, they still have that door opened to them.
Step one to turning this around and eradicating the degeneracy is closing that door to women. Help their kids directly, but don't put a dime in the hands of a single mother. If she needs job training, fine. If she needs day care for her many children, fine. Other than that.. nope.
heydaralon wrote:I knew a girl that collected daddies. She had quite an impressive drug problem, although I don't know if she got any gov't assistance besides EBT. Kids are so fucking expensive. How much welfare do you get per kid as a single mom? Even between that and the child support I still don't think from an economic standpoint it makes sense but idk.Speaker to Animals wrote:California wrote:
This stuff is really common amongst non-college educated millennial women. They have few career options opened to them in life, their SMV runs out in their mid-twenties, and they usually already have one baby out of wedlock, which gets them hooked on all the welfare.
In a way, I don't really blame them. If your choice is between being a single mom and serving tables at IHOP for the rest of your life.. that's not really a choice. Most women just want to be moms anyway, and the degenerate culture sabotaged their ability to pair bond and ruined their suitability for marriage very early on. But because we subsidize single mothers, they still have that door opened to them.
Step one to turning this around and eradicating the degeneracy is closing that door to women. Help their kids directly, but don't put a dime in the hands of a single mother. If she needs job training, fine. If she needs day care for her many children, fine. Other than that.. nope.
I'm sure its real. This is how the welfare plantation worksheydaralon wrote:California wrote:
There's no way that's real
California wrote:I think another problem with women our age is that they are all seeing their stock rapidly decrease while male stock continues to rise until their 50s. The good-looking ones who had everything given to them their whole life while being fawned over by men now have a couple kids and a husband that they are determined to bring down to their level of misery. This, combined with the constant competition through social media makes for bitter alcoholics.
This is happening in my own life and the lives of all of my friends. My friends who are still single have an even rougher time because the only women in their late 30s who are more of a mess than married women are the ones who are divorced are permanently single. This attitude is happening to both housewives and career women from what I've seen.
It really is a catch 22 though, because I think everyone would be happy having kids younger, but with the way careers and life in general is set up now the 20s are viewed as an extended adolescence. I love my kids, but I feel like I could have a lot more personal fun time to look forward to if they were 13 and 16 while I'm 37 rather than 3 and 6. This same feeling has to be magnified to women since personal appearances are so much more part of their existence than it is for men.
I dunno... the spelling doesn't seem bad enough.California wrote:I'm sure its real. This is how the welfare plantation worksheydaralon wrote:California wrote:
There's no way that's real