Okeefenokee wrote:Montegriffo wrote:Okeefenokee wrote:Something tells me that isn't the original rope.
Well science tells us it is...........
BjornP wrote:Okeefenokee wrote:Something tells me that isn't the original rope.
The one in the picture may not be, but the original rope - made of leather strips - was of course preserved in the bog just as the rest of the body was. Wether it survived post-excavation, though.... no mention of that. Most articles and sites focus only on the body and its story.
Yes, I also read the article saying the rope was preserved. The rope in the image looks nothing like the rest of the preserved body, and I would guess is not the actual rope.
"Looks nothing like the rest of the preserved body". Well....no? Why would it? It would not have collapsed the way a body does. Compare it the leather cap the body's wearing, and not the body for a sec. The reason the bog preserved the body so well has to do with the acidity of the bog, preventing microbes and bacteria from eating away at the body for millenia. Logically, that effect would apply to leather, as well. Take the chemicals and preservation techniques museum conservators use to arrest the deterioration of historical artifacts into account, and it's not at all surprising that it's the original rope. Part of the conservator's job is also to clean up the historical artifacts (as far as it is possible and responsible, that is). Most historical artifacts uncovered from the soil, are usually cleaned up before being exhibited in a museum, Okee...
I currently got an internship at a center that houses thousands of historical artifacts, documents, as well as a conservator work station. Two weeks ago, one of the conservators sat down at the work station near me with a 700 year old skull....where the brain was still inside. Admittedly, it had turned into soap and shrunken in size, but you could basicly still tell it was a brain.
Fame is not flattery. Respect is not agreement.