But I'm sure that if they just vet even more extremely against those seven countries, the US won't have any Islamic terrorist attacks, at all..
Of course! Are you some sort of terrorist lover?
.
Wait, do we hate him for being a terrorist-lover, socialist, or just beta this week?
Here comes StA to clear it up for us.
All of the above?
The blood-dimmed tide is loosed, and everywhere
The ceremony of innocence is drowned;
The best lack all conviction, while the worst
Are full of passionate intensity.
To be perfectly candid with you folks, I'd probably cum a lot harder skull-fucking 72 terrorists than doing 72 inexperienced, hairy, middle eastern chicks.
Still got my foreskin thanks for asking. - Montegriffo.
boethius wrote:To be perfectly candid with you folks, I'd probably cum a lot harder skull-fucking 72 terrorists than doing 72 inexperienced, hairy, middle eastern chicks.
That is one image I didn't need to get in my head...
boethius wrote:To be perfectly candid with you folks, I'd probably cum a lot harder skull-fucking 72 terrorists than doing 72 inexperienced, hairy, middle eastern chicks.
That is one image I didn't need to get in my head...
That's why you're not as fun at parties.
Still got my foreskin thanks for asking. - Montegriffo.
So if you are asking an honest question, it would be whether the vetting being done by President Obama was sufficient. Of this list, 18 were in the country prior to 2001, one entered in 2002, two more in 2009, and one in 2010. The data doesn't show when the rest entered, but another 15 had their charge date prior to 2002, and yet ANOTHER 17 before 2008. There are only 14 who were charged during Obama's time in office who were not documented in this file as already being in the country, the latest of who was charged in 2011. NONE of these are shown to be recent refugees. I'm sorry, but as evidence that the rigorous vetting being done was insufficient this data is absolute crap. Given that there are thousands of interpreters who worked closely with US troops and have been thoroughly vetted by both the military and by immigration, and who are being actively hunted and killed by Isis, but whom we are unwilling to grant visas, I find claims that the worry is about "vetting" to be a very dishonest one.
boethius wrote:To be perfectly candid with you folks, I'd probably cum a lot harder skull-fucking 72 terrorists than doing 72 inexperienced, hairy, middle eastern chicks.
That is one image I didn't need to get in my head...
That's why you're not as fun at parties.
If he wears that Fallout coat, we will have to toss him off the rooftop, though.
The Conservative wrote:If you can get me on the roof in the first place, that's the nice thing about those jackets, they can hide a lot of nasty surprises
So its a Magic Coat of Sneaking, huh.
I thought it was merely a magic coat of butt invasion +3.
The Conservative wrote:If you can get me on the roof in the first place, that's the nice thing about those jackets, they can hide a lot of nasty surprises
So its a Magic Coat of Sneaking, huh.
I thought it was merely a magic coat of butt invasion +3.
No that's more like what it conseals, which would be a few daggers, a pistol, and one to two other things that I'll leave as a surprise.