-
SuburbanFarmer
- Posts: 25287
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Post
by SuburbanFarmer » Tue Jan 03, 2017 10:41 pm
Speaker to Animals wrote:Penner wrote:Speaker to Animals wrote:One wonders why the democrats think the FBI exists.
How is this connected to the FBI and the Dems, again? It seems that the party in charge of Congress (the Republicans) are just making corruption even more prevalent.
The FBI is responsible for investigating and providing evidence to federal prosecutors corruption in Congress. It's that simple.
Nope. Most of the corruption in congress is perfectly legal. They make the laws, remember?
The fact that "lobbying" is now considered a legitimate profession is...wow.
-
Okeefenokee
- Posts: 12950
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:27 pm
- Location: The Great Place
Post
by Okeefenokee » Tue Jan 03, 2017 10:51 pm
How does a toothless body that can't even declare wrong doing do anything to combat corruption?
It's a court jester. It serves no other purpose than to make the peasants feel better.
Pass some corruption laws, FFS.
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Dumb slut partied too hard and woke up in a weird house. Ran out the door, weeping for her failed life choices, concerned townsfolk notes her appearance and alerted the fuzz.
viewtopic.php?p=60751#p60751
-
Kazmyr
- Posts: 811
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:33 am
Post
by Kazmyr » Wed Jan 04, 2017 6:55 am
Okeefenokee wrote:How does a toothless body that can't even declare wrong doing do anything to combat corruption?
It's a court jester. It serves no other purpose than to make the peasants feel better.
Pass some corruption laws, FFS.
Throw the word 'Ethics' in the title and immediately it becomes the most important body in DC. Doesn't matter what they actually do (or don't, in this case), as long as it says it's an ethics office, it's essential!
Martin Hash wrote:Liberty allows people to get their jollies any way they want. Just don't expect to masturbate with my lotion.
-
Speaker to Animals
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Post
by Speaker to Animals » Wed Jan 04, 2017 6:58 am
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Speaker to Animals wrote:Penner wrote:
How is this connected to the FBI and the Dems, again? It seems that the party in charge of Congress (the Republicans) are just making corruption even more prevalent.
The FBI is responsible for investigating and providing evidence to federal prosecutors corruption in Congress. It's that simple.
Nope. Most of the corruption in congress is perfectly legal. They make the laws, remember?
The fact that "lobbying" is now considered a legitimate profession is...wow.
Yes. That's actrually their job. All the members of Congress who have been charged, convicted, and sentenced were investigated by the FBI who then recommended to federal prosecutors that the members be indicted.
The OCE apparently became nothing more than a political weapon. Which, if you think about it, is the only outcome for such a body within a legislature.
-
Martin Hash
- Posts: 18733
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm
Post
by Martin Hash » Wed Jan 04, 2017 7:06 am
All I know about the Congressional Ethics Office is in this article:
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/poli ... /96121100/
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change
-
Kazmyr
- Posts: 811
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:33 am
Post
by Kazmyr » Wed Jan 04, 2017 7:19 am
It is not clear exactly how the new proposed rules would have affected ethics investigations. . .
Martin Hash wrote:Liberty allows people to get their jollies any way they want. Just don't expect to masturbate with my lotion.
-
Okeefenokee
- Posts: 12950
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:27 pm
- Location: The Great Place
Post
by Okeefenokee » Wed Jan 04, 2017 11:11 am
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Dumb slut partied too hard and woke up in a weird house. Ran out the door, weeping for her failed life choices, concerned townsfolk notes her appearance and alerted the fuzz.
viewtopic.php?p=60751#p60751
-
clubgop
- Posts: 7978
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm
Post
by clubgop » Wed Jan 04, 2017 8:31 pm
Penner wrote:Speaker to Animals wrote:One wonders why the democrats think the FBI exists.
How is this connected to the FBI and the Dems, again? It seems that the party in charge of Congress (the Republicans) are just making corruption even more prevalent.
No, dumbass. Do you always willingly take the msm narrative word for word?
-
Okeefenokee
- Posts: 12950
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:27 pm
- Location: The Great Place
Post
by Okeefenokee » Wed Jan 04, 2017 8:55 pm
clubgop wrote:Penner wrote:Speaker to Animals wrote:One wonders why the democrats think the FBI exists.
How is this connected to the FBI and the Dems, again? It seems that the party in charge of Congress (the Republicans) are just making corruption even more prevalent.
No, dumbass. Do you always willingly take the msm narrative word for word?
No, no, no, didn't you hear? They criticized her grandson,
Among the most prominent cases brought by the Office of Congressional Ethics since it was created was an investigation into Representative Maxine Waters, Democrat of California, who was accused of intervening with the Treasury Department to try to assist a struggling bank in which her husband owned stock.
Ms. Waters was ultimately cleared by the House Ethics Committee, but the committee criticized the actions of her grandson, who was then her chief of staff, and urged the House to consider broadening a ban on lawmakers’ hiring their relatives to include grandchildren.
HER FUCKING GRANDSON!
She'll think twice next time.
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Dumb slut partied too hard and woke up in a weird house. Ran out the door, weeping for her failed life choices, concerned townsfolk notes her appearance and alerted the fuzz.
viewtopic.php?p=60751#p60751
-
clubgop
- Posts: 7978
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm
Post
by clubgop » Wed Jan 04, 2017 9:08 pm
Okeefenokee wrote:clubgop wrote:Penner wrote:
How is this connected to the FBI and the Dems, again? It seems that the party in charge of Congress (the Republicans) are just making corruption even more prevalent.
No, dumbass. Do you always willingly take the msm narrative word for word?
No, no, no, didn't you hear? They criticized her grandson,
Among the most prominent cases brought by the Office of Congressional Ethics since it was created was an investigation into Representative Maxine Waters, Democrat of California, who was accused of intervening with the Treasury Department to try to assist a struggling bank in which her husband owned stock.
Ms. Waters was ultimately cleared by the House Ethics Committee, but the committee criticized the actions of her grandson, who was then her chief of staff, and urged the House to consider broadening a ban on lawmakers’ hiring their relatives to include grandchildren.
HER FUCKING GRANDSON!
She'll think twice next time.
Yes and they urged strongly. Penner yearns for a good urging.
WTF anyway? Excuse the thing with the bank your husband has a stake in but a make a big deal of your Chief of staff bloodline, not his actions, but his lineage, thats the problem. Tits on a bull indeed.