your wording in combination with your quoting me, made it seem like your "Yeah, yeah" and "derp" comments were aimed at me
Well done Data, you've developed the human characteristic of paranoia. Now you just need to learn to recognise sarcasm...
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
your wording in combination with your quoting me, made it seem like your "Yeah, yeah" and "derp" comments were aimed at me
Well done Data, you've developed the human characteristic of paranoia. Now you just need to learn to recognise sarcasm...
I recognized the sarcasm, it just seemed to be aimed at my statement
you were doing a DBTrek impression, and generally when DB makes a comment like that in response to a poster he is quoting, the sarcasm is aimed at said poster
The MHF, where even agreeing with someone ends in an argument.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
The MHF, where even agreeing with someone ends in an argument.
just be clearer
and you will avoid a similar misinterpretation
next time around
invoking DBTrek style sarcasm after a quoted post, could easily lead the quoted poster to assume that sarcasm is aimed at them, without any further clarification, since that is how DB rolls
The MHF, where even agreeing with someone ends in an argument.
just be clearer
and you will avoid a similar misinterpretation
next time around
invoking DBTrek style sarcasm after a quoted post, could easily lead the quoted poster to assume that sarcasm is aimed at them, without any further clarification, since that is how DB rolls
This wasn't clarification enough for you?
...and I was agreeing with you, pillock.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
The MHF, where even agreeing with someone ends in an argument.
just be clearer
and you will avoid a similar misinterpretation
next time around
invoking DBTrek style sarcasm after a quoted post, could easily lead the quoted poster to assume that sarcasm is aimed at them, without any further clarification, since that is how DB rolls
This wasn't clarification enough for you?
...and I was agreeing with you, pillock.
no it was
I am saying next time around
if you don't want to be easily misinterpreted in the first place
make it clearer before that misinterpretation occurs, especially when using DBTrek style sarcasm in a situation that DB doesn't usually use it in
if you don't do that, then don't be surprised if someone takes what you are saying the wrong way
those who want to pretend it wouldn't have happened afterwards, if Biden hadn't reneged on the deal Trump got
Not following. Are you saying that Trump deal leads to the same?
regardless of when America pulled out, the Taliban were coming back, to fill the void
May or September doesn't make a difference, in that regard
Who knows. Now we are talking about a history that won't ever exist. I don't disagree necessarily but now that it has all been mucked up, who can say for certain other than saying that this is Biden's mess? He wanted to be a hero so bad but alas.
Not following. Are you saying that Trump deal leads to the same?
regardless of when America pulled out, the Taliban were coming back, to fill the void
May or September doesn't make a difference, in that regard
Who knows. Now we are talking about a history that won't ever exist. I don't disagree necessarily but now that it has all been mucked up, who can say for certain other than saying that this is Biden's mess? He wanted to be a hero so bad but alas.
he certainly handled it poorly
but if he handled it as well as he possibly could have
the Taliban would still have filled the void regardless
same as if Trump was still POTUS
people would blame whoever was in charge
as if they could do something to stop it
but that wasn't in the cards and the people who think it was, are engaging in wishful thinking
Last edited by StCapps on Mon Aug 16, 2021 3:58 am, edited 1 time in total.
