Europe, Boring Until it's Not

[Speaker to Animals]

Most Americans were completely burned out from saving your asses the last time, and then you proceeded to guarantee that it would happen again. So Americans were like fuck you, then, good luck next time.

IMHO - it was the fucking French more than the Brits that sealed the deal for WWII.....fucking arrogant bastards.

British needed only to join the Americans in telling them to back off.

[The Conservative]

England may as well fly the ISIS flag over Big Ben.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/1 ... rt-anyone/

A more reasoned report from the Daily Mail (I never thought I would utter that phrase)

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... error.html

So because he was lonely and depressed, it was ok to attack cops. Are you fucking insane?

[Montegriffo]

England may as well fly the ISIS flag over Big Ben.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/1 ... rt-anyone/

A more reasoned report from the Daily Mail (I never thought I would utter that phrase)

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... error.html

So because he was lonely and depressed, it was ok to attack cops. Are you fucking insane?

No, but if you read the sensible article you will see that he remained in his car then got out hoping to be shot. He didn't injure the cops until they tried to disarm him.
Also, he was only acquitted of terrorism charges, it is likely he will face other charges now such as wounding an officer and carrying an offensive weapon (5 years minimum for a knife).

[The Conservative]

A more reasoned report from the Daily Mail (I never thought I would utter that phrase)

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... error.html

So because he was lonely and depressed, it was ok to attack cops. Are you fucking insane?

No, but if you read the sensible article you will see that he remained in his car then got out hoping to be shot. He didn't injure the cops until they tried to disarm him.
Also, he was only acquitted of terrorism charges, it is likely he will face other charges now such as wounding an officer and carrying an offensive weapon (5 years minimum for a knife).

Wait, I am supposed to read past the adds that keep on popping up on my phone telling me I won a $1000, etc... sorry, I don't have time for that shit. I was lucky I got to the point about "muy feelz"

The fact he attempted to attack, it doesn't matter if he was successful. Just hang the ISIS flag up and call it a day, it will make your life so much easier... of course that's also if you will be alive after they come through the culture culling.

[Montegriffo]

So because he was lonely and depressed, it was ok to attack cops. Are you fucking insane?

No, but if you read the sensible article you will see that he remained in his car then got out hoping to be shot. He didn't injure the cops until they tried to disarm him.
Also, he was only acquitted of terrorism charges, it is likely he will face other charges now such as wounding an officer and carrying an offensive weapon (5 years minimum for a knife).

Wait, I am supposed to read past the adds that keep on popping up on my phone telling me I won a $1000, etc... sorry, I don't have time for that shit. I was lucky I got to the point about "muy feelz"

The fact he attempted to attack, it doesn't matter if he was successful. Just hang the ISIS flag up and call it a day, it will make your life so much easier... of course that's also if you will be alive after they come through the culture culling.

Well no, I don't expect you to read anything which contradicts your anti-Muslim bias. Even when it is a right wing rag like the Mail.
Keep reading the Hateway pundit. It is so much easier to wreck the arguments of the uninformed than take on someone with half a clue.

[The Conservative]

No, but if you read the sensible article you will see that he remained in his car then got out hoping to be shot. He didn't injure the cops until they tried to disarm him.
Also, he was only acquitted of terrorism charges, it is likely he will face other charges now such as wounding an officer and carrying an offensive weapon (5 years minimum for a knife).

Wait, I am supposed to read past the adds that keep on popping up on my phone telling me I won a $1000, etc... sorry, I don't have time for that shit. I was lucky I got to the point about "muy feelz"

The fact he attempted to attack, it doesn't matter if he was successful. Just hang the ISIS flag up and call it a day, it will make your life so much easier... of course that's also if you will be alive after they come through the culture culling.

Well no, I don't expect you to read anything which contradicts your anti-Muslim bias. Even when it is a right wing rag like the Mail.
Keep reading the Hateway pundit. It is so much easier to wreck the arguments of the uninformed than taking on someone with half a clue.

Show me a site that doesn't have spam built into its phone reader, it's not too tough now, is it? Oh, sorry... you refuse to do hard work.

And I don't have an anti-muslim anything, what I have is an anti-ISIS or Jihad bias... sorry, I like living unlike you.

Oh, and a side note, depression is not a reason to attack someone, even if it meant for suicide. Fuck that, he wants to commit suicide, I heard the people over in Fukushima need people to clean up the mess there.

[Otern]

Truth be told, the Soviets were probably more brutal an inhuman than the Nazi's. Our popular history doesn't remember it that way. The Danes going neutral in WWII was probably the best decision by the government for it's citizens.

No. Just no.

Our popular history actually makes the Germans seem pretty nice, all things considered. Keep in mind, we keep thinking of "nazi war crimes", not "German war crimes". This was an effort by the western allies and western Germany to distance Germany from their responsibility with nazism. Because the Soviet Union was our new enemy, and Western Germany our new friends. And the propaganda took hold, and now many people honestly believe Germany was the lesser of two evils. They were one of two evils, that is true, but they were so far from the lesser evil as you could get. This "the germans weren't that bad"-propaganda effort was done by the Soviets too, because they too had Eastern Germany as their new ally. As a consequence, these propaganda efforts have given the general public a pretty limited understanding of the true nature of Germany during the war. Holocaust is hammered into us so much we think this was pretty much the only bad thing Germany did.

Read up on the hunger plan. It makes the Holodomor look like a misdemeanor in comparison. If Germany had succeeded in Barborossa, they would've starved 20-30 million civilians. In comparison, the Soviet Union won, and occupied the German territories, and about a million german died, both from western allied mismanagement, and to a larger extent combination of famine and mismanagement from the Soviet Union.

You had a better chance to survive the war as a German soldier captured in the battle of Stalingrad, than as a Soviet soldier captured during the first year of the war. (And those were the germans that had the worst odds). The only reason they kept Soviet soldiers alive after the first year, was because they needed their manpower in the war industry.


I see this trend of "oh the Soviet Union were the real bad guys". And it's all based on some pop history fandom of Soviet atrocities, without going into the same depth of the German atrocities. Yes, the Soviets were bad, horrible, and should never happen again, and they did awful things. And yes, we don't learn enough about it in school. But damn if the same is true for the common knowledge about German atrocities during the war too. People have a limited knowledge of the Holocaust, and call it quits there. But there's more, there's way more. Hunger plan, aktion t4, and many, many more.

Soviet won, and there's still a Germany, and there's still German people around. But there wouldn't be a living slav west of the Urals ten years later if Germany won, and there would be no Russia.
The Germans did more damage in two years, than the Soviet Union did in ten. And yes, the Soviet Union lasted far longer, and caused more deaths due to its longevity. But you better believe Germany would've caused FAR more deaths if it actually managed to succeed. They would've used their victory to ramp up the killing, not slow it down.

[TheReal_ND]

Utter tripe. The Soviets blamed the Nazis for many killing fields and when they moved into the concentration camps they went out of their way to make a spectacle of them by piling a bunch of little kids shoes in a pile and "documenting" the "nazi travesties." These same fucking Bolsheviks and Stalinists were AMERICAN ALLIES. Just shut up.

Honestly we have to wait for your generation to die before the programing will wear off.

[SuburbanFarmer]

[TheReal_ND]

Oh and FUUUUUCKKK YOOOOUUUU for extrapolating into some imaginary scenario where the SCARY GERMANS murdered ONE THIRD OF THE ENTIRE WORLD (if America and Russia didn't HEROICALLY STOP THEM)

Go fuck yourself with a crusty stick for repeating the enemy mantra. You really want to entertain one third of the Holocaust? Entertain this and get back to me. Oh wait lol. You can't watch this in your country. Fuck off you slimy dick sucker. Fuck you.