One of StA's argument is that US immigration reform in 1965 was a bad idea, and he would like to slow down the trend which will result in white's eventually becoming a minority in America.DrYouth wrote:I'm still not getting this...Okeefenokee wrote:It's going back to the idea of Anglo-Saxon vs Celt rather than how it's all been boiled down to just white.DrYouth wrote: How could a White Ethno State in America be a "German Ethno State"?
Please elaborate.
Is the premise that America was always a white ethno state (like Germany)... and it was a mistake allowing it to become a "multiethnic" state... and that this is the root of American instablilty?
Is that the premise?
In other words - America would have been better not abolishing slavery and not rolling back Jim Crow... and not allowing non-white immigration.
I just want to understand the competing arguments here....
Another of StA's arguments, he believes that most viable white ethno state in America, would be one based on a white racial identity, as opposed an ethno state based on a single ethnicity. Germania or Bust, is the argument that most viable white ethno state in America, would be based on one ethnic group that happens to be white, most likely Germans, as opposed to one based on a white racial identity.
But basically the ethnostate debate has devolved into both sides arguing past each other and attacking strawmen of each others positions. The term "ethnostate" triggers the forum and most folks cannot discuss the topic rationally, without visions of a dystopia either being the impetus for creating a white ethno state, or the result of creating a white ethno state.
I tried to keep them on topic, and away from fantasies of the sky falling, but SIFCLFs often can't be reasoned with, their delusions are too tightly held. If you ever went back and read those threads Youth, you would realize that me and Smitty were like the only folks talking any sense, while the tide of reactionary bullshit on both sides of the argument lashed out anyone disagreeing with them.