The Armory - Guns, Knives, and Axes

[Speaker to Animals]

You need to take on a high angle of attack to avoid the joos.

No you don't. Literally just fucking make f-35's.

F-35 would lose in a fight against most fighters today. The Jews won't even lift a finger.

Interesting that the Israelis said fuck no to a stock F-35. They get the F-35 but they put their own ECM avionics on there.

[C-Mag]

Yes, without Wunderwaffe

Only because America sided with the Soviets rather than against them, when the Soviets faced the American Wunderwaffe in the Cold War, they couldn't compete, thus they were contained until they collapsed under the weight of their own tanks.

The Soviets were always playing catch up with our technology, but that's what happens when you have trouble feeding your own people. Soviets, and commies in general always go for the war of attrition. I submit there is a distinction between war of attrition and utilization of good enough tech to get the job done. The Soviets and Americans were the extreme ends of this spectrum. To the Soviets, spending lives and equipment meant trying to get the job done. To the Americans getting the job done and preserving life was more important. Thus the US relied heavily on combined arms and artillery to do the most killing. Communication was a huge advantage for the US.

Infantry PLT Leader on the phone, talking to the Tank Commander and talking to the close air support.


Pretty fucking cool. T-34 didn't even have a radio

[C-Mag]

You need to take on a high angle of attack to avoid the joos.

No you don't. Literally just fucking make f-35's.

F-35 would lose in a fight against most fighters today. The Jews won't even lift a finger.

I don't know about that. Probably depends on the type of fight.

[Smitty-48]

It's not the 1940's anymore, nolstagia doesn't dominate the battlespace in the 21st century.

[Speaker to Animals]

No you don't. Literally just fucking make f-35's.

F-35 would lose in a fight against most fighters today. The Jews won't even lift a finger.

I don't know about that. Probably depends on the type of fight.

It carries only 4 decent missiles, and at best maybe one would hit a target. At guns range it dies because it's a poor performer all-around. Then there is the fact that the stealth is useless, since even the Serbians were able to target that material in the 2000s.

Analysts have predicted it would fall to MiG-21. It's that bad.

[Smitty-48]

I don't know about that. Probably depends on the type of fight.

With stealth, EODAS and sensor fusion, the F-35 picks and chooses the time and place of its fight, the 4th generation fighters do not have the initiative, they wont know its there until they are in the kill zone.

[Speaker to Animals]

F-35 isn't going to pick and choose anything. It will get targeted and shot down.

[Smitty-48]

Fake Reform Mafia Mother Jones Magazine Fake News Talking Points. /shrugs

[TheReal_ND]

You need to take on a high angle of attack to avoid the joos.

No you don't. Literally just fucking make f-35's.

F-35 would lose in a fight against most fighters today. The Jews won't even lift a finger.

Interesting that the Israelis said fuck no to a stock F-35. They get the F-35 but they put their own ECM avionics on there.

Their loss. I doubt they are improving on the Northrop. Jews are just looking for an angle to start fucking with shit

F-35 would lose in a fight against most fighters today.

Yeah ok kiddo.

[Smitty-48]