It is. But I won't try to debate feelz with you. We both know you can shit up a thread for days, over pedantry.Speaker to Animals wrote:GrumpyCatFace wrote:Is the objective purpose of the universe to carry maximum information?Speaker to Animals wrote:Dude. Lol. Which signal carries more information?
It tends toward Order, that's all I'm saying. An even distribution of matter/energy is more 'orderly' than a separated one.
You implied the bottom signal was more orderly. Fact check false.
Star Trek Discovery
-
- Posts: 25278
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Re: Star Trek Discovery
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: Star Trek Discovery
GrumpyCatFace wrote:It is. But I won't try to debate feelz with you. We both know you can shit up a thread for days, over pedantry.Speaker to Animals wrote:GrumpyCatFace wrote:
Is the objective purpose of the universe to carry maximum information?
It tends toward Order, that's all I'm saying. An even distribution of matter/energy is more 'orderly' than a separated one.
You implied the bottom signal was more orderly. Fact check false.
No. It's really not. There exists only one bit of information in the bottom signal..
-
- Posts: 25278
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Re: Star Trek Discovery
That’s an orderly system, isn’t it. However, this has nothing to do with entropy or thermodynamics, which is what I was discussing.Speaker to Animals wrote:GrumpyCatFace wrote:It is. But I won't try to debate feelz with you. We both know you can shit up a thread for days, over pedantry.Speaker to Animals wrote:
You implied the bottom signal was more orderly. Fact check false.
No. It's really not. There exists only one bit of information in the bottom signal..
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: Star Trek Discovery
GrumpyCatFace wrote:That’s an orderly system, isn’t it. However, this has nothing to do with entropy or thermodynamics, which is what I was discussing.Speaker to Animals wrote:GrumpyCatFace wrote:
It is. But I won't try to debate feelz with you. We both know you can shit up a thread for days, over pedantry.
No. It's really not. There exists only one bit of information in the bottom signal..
It has everything to do with it. You just don't understand the topic.
-
- Posts: 25278
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Re: Star Trek Discovery
I wasn't interested in the former topic, so I took an aside to discuss the "order vs disorder" distinction of the laws of entropy. Non-autists are thinking. You are typing.Speaker to Animals wrote:GrumpyCatFace wrote:That’s an orderly system, isn’t it. However, this has nothing to do with entropy or thermodynamics, which is what I was discussing.Speaker to Animals wrote:
No. It's really not. There exists only one bit of information in the bottom signal..
It has everything to do with it. You just don't understand the topic.
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: Star Trek Discovery
Is no else fully caught up on Discovery but me? Take that CBS All Access, fuck you and the horse you rode in on.
Last edited by StCapps on Thu Nov 16, 2017 9:19 am, edited 1 time in total.
*yip*
-
- Posts: 25278
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Re: Star Trek Discovery
I already smoke. Don't need more cancer.StCapps wrote:Is no else caught up on Discovery but me? Take that CBS All Access, fuck you and the horse you rode in on.
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: Star Trek Discovery
You still need to watch a lot of shows before you watch Discovery anyway, even when it comes to Star Trek series. Mush!GrumpyCatFace wrote:I already smoke. Don't need more cancer.StCapps wrote:Is no else caught up on Discovery but me? Take that CBS All Access, fuck you and the horse you rode in on.
*yip*
-
- Posts: 25278
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Re: Star Trek Discovery
The only Trek I haven't seen is DS9, and I started it last week. (Lens Flare Remake II doesn't count)StCapps wrote:You still need to watch a lot of shows before you watch Discovery anyway. Mush!GrumpyCatFace wrote:I already smoke. Don't need more cancer.StCapps wrote:Is no else caught up on Discovery but me? Take that CBS All Access, fuck you and the horse you rode in on.
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: Star Trek Discovery
Yeah and DS9 is the best one, get moving. Plus you got to watch The Wire, you TV noob.GrumpyCatFace wrote:The only Trek I haven't seen is DS9, and I started it last week. (Lens Flare Remake II doesn't count)
Last edited by StCapps on Thu Nov 16, 2017 9:26 am, edited 3 times in total.
*yip*