The current crop of left wing debaters is weak
-
- Posts: 26035
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:23 pm
Re: The current crop of left wing debaters is weak
You keep saying he's not doing anything like it means something. Must be fun to live in a fact free world
-
- Posts: 5991
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 1:54 am
Re: The current crop of left wing debaters is weak
Me?
I never said he wasn't doing anything. I said he is a goober (which I stand by), and that your wildest dreams aren't going to come true (also something I stand by).
I never said he wasn't doing anything. I said he is a goober (which I stand by), and that your wildest dreams aren't going to come true (also something I stand by).
HAIL!
Her needs America so they won't just take his shit away like in some pussy non gun totting countries can happen.
-Hwen
Her needs America so they won't just take his shit away like in some pussy non gun totting countries can happen.
-Hwen
-
- Posts: 26035
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:23 pm
Re: The current crop of left wing debaters is weak
Well tuck you too then
-
- Posts: 18721
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm
Re: The current crop of left wing debaters is weak
If nothing else, future candidates will need to show some swagger. Trump's getting lots of love for that. (Funny how Bush Jr. was such a wimp whenever he swaggered, he was mocked. You got to embrace the Alpha.)Hanarchy Montanarchy wrote:OR, and I know this might sound crazy, this whole Trump experiment will prove to half the country that electing a goober won't make their wildest dreams come true while proving to the other half that it isn't the end of the godamn world; and this is as far apart as we get culturally.
Not bad, as far as nadirs go eh?
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change
-
- Posts: 5991
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 1:54 am
Re: The current crop of left wing debaters is weak
Exactly so. The left pearl clutchers have some time to untwist their fucking panties, and then come up with some non-technocrats who aren't completely compromised, and have a modicum of verve.Martin Hash wrote:If nothing else, future candidates will need to show some swagger. Trump's getting lots of love for that. (Funny how Bush Jr. was such a wimp whenever he swaggered, he was mocked. You got to embrace the Alpha.)Hanarchy Montanarchy wrote:OR, and I know this might sound crazy, this whole Trump experiment will prove to half the country that electing a goober won't make their wildest dreams come true while proving to the other half that it isn't the end of the godamn world; and this is as far apart as we get culturally.
Not bad, as far as nadirs go eh?
The right can do the same, but maybe go slightly more technocratic, on account of 'gee this is harder than I thought is was gonna be' doesn't exactly fill me with confidence.
HAIL!
Her needs America so they won't just take his shit away like in some pussy non gun totting countries can happen.
-Hwen
Her needs America so they won't just take his shit away like in some pussy non gun totting countries can happen.
-Hwen
-
- Posts: 25278
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Re: The current crop of left wing debaters is weak
Best possible outcome, really.Hanarchy Montanarchy wrote:OR, and I know this might sound crazy, this whole Trump experiment will prove to half the country that electing a goober won't make their wildest dreams come true while proving to the other half that it isn't the end of the godamn world; and this is as far apart as we get culturally.
Not bad, as far as nadirs go eh?
-
- Posts: 1819
- Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 1:52 am
Re: The current crop of left wing debaters is weak
Do they really need it?Speaker to Animals wrote:Or put another way: the cities are Athens, the rest of us are Sparta. That's the division we have.
The cities depend on globalism. They need open borders. They need the stuff that ruins the rest of America.
We cannot reconcile this. We need to walk back this federation idea or those cities will eventually be destroyed. If conflict comes, the cities are utterly indefensible. Your entire Democrat population is stuffed in there like rats too.
An there is a guarantee that the number of mass shootings would go down?GrumpyCatFace wrote:Cigarettes, medicines, chemicals, explosives...Hwen Hoshino wrote:What other dangerous items need exactly those regulations?GrumpyCatFace wrote:
Mainly those of background checks, registry of arms, regulation of the gun shows.... ya know. Things that are expected of nearly every other market for dangerous items.
-
- Posts: 12950
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:27 pm
- Location: The Great Place
Re: The current crop of left wing debaters is weak
but he's not a lefty, folks.GrumpyCatFace wrote:Cigarettes, medicines, chemicals, explosives...Hwen Hoshino wrote:What other dangerous items need exactly those regulations?GrumpyCatFace wrote:
Mainly those of background checks, registry of arms, regulation of the gun shows.... ya know. Things that are expected of nearly every other market for dangerous items.
background checks and registry for cigarettes...
loon.
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Dumb slut partied too hard and woke up in a weird house. Ran out the door, weeping for her failed life choices, concerned townsfolk notes her appearance and alerted the fuzz.
viewtopic.php?p=60751#p60751
-
- Posts: 25278
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Re: The current crop of left wing debaters is weak
An there is a guarantee that the number of mass shootings would go down?[/quote]GrumpyCatFace wrote:Cigarettes, medicines, chemicals, explosives...Hwen Hoshino wrote: What other dangerous items need exactly those regulations?
Of course not. But there is a strong likelihood, as borne out by the statistics of countries with stronger regulation.
-
- Posts: 1819
- Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 1:52 am
Re: The current crop of left wing debaters is weak
Of course not. But there is a strong likelihood, as borne out by the statistics of countries with stronger regulation.[/quote]GrumpyCatFace wrote:An there is a guarantee that the number of mass shootings would go down?GrumpyCatFace wrote:Cigarettes, medicines, chemicals, explosives...Hwen Hoshino wrote: What other dangerous items need exactly those regulations?
Mass shootings are random. Just look at Sweden, you can have a mega year because some dude has a super murder boner.