Any Dancarlin Forum April 1st stunts?

[StCapps]

Well, if it's any consolation, during the election I lumped you as a Trump sycophant. Doesn't meant I'd write off your criticisms, though. But, of course, I am an ubermensch of tolerance, understanding and compromise.

You mistook me for a Trump sycophant some ubermensch of understanding you are. Derp.

He's been playing the victim for years, setting himself up as a victim everytime he's about to lose. I'm not surprised that he conned other people. Repeat a lie often enough and some people will accept it as truth.

StA doesn't play the victim anywhere near as often as monte, kath and ooky these days. When he does play victim, it is most often because he is being berated by an avalanche of strawmen, there is no more strawmanned member of the board except maybe nukedog or Kath. One of the reasons Kath has turned to into an anti-Trump reactionary, she is sick of being called a Hillary supporter by folks who are retaliating for being dismissed as Trump sycophants by her, but she overcompensates and now picks her battles regarding Trump very poorly because she's all butthurt about it.

Nonsense. Look at the news about Russia and Syria, instead of just Trump. People think all (negative) news about Russia or Syria is fake news because they believe it's tied to some sort of MSM "fake news" culture, or conspiracy (admittedly only few believe in the latter).

Most of the Russia stuff the anti-Trump side talks about is fake news. On the Syria tip plenty of folks that have been lumped in as Trump sycophants have called out others for being so sure Russia or Assad wasn't behind the gas attack.

You're right, they have criticized him on the online privacy issue and - for some reason - they got surprised that he wouldn't get less involved in the ME despite promising excatly that during his campaign (on "annihilating" ISIS) and that he'd increase US military might. That's lately, though.

Nah every last one of them have criticized him from the beginning, not just lately. Just because they didn't criticize him as often the anti-Trumpers did doesn't mean they never criticized him when the situation called for it.

Seriously, what forum are you reading? SilverEagle threatened to curb-stomp Atanamis not too long ago for calling him out on his thin-skinned intolerance of "gay propaganda". Doesn't get more hysterical than that.

I saw there exchange and that doesn't make SilverEagle one of the foremost victim player on this forum. What forum are you reading?

Oh it's full blown clique, Kath, montegriffo, ooky, grumpycatface, penner, etc.
They honestly think the only reason anyone would find fault with their criticisms of Trump is because they are his sycophants, if they weren't his sycophants than they would be applauding their worst arguments against Trump instead of defending him for such nonsense. It's fucking ridiculous and they strawman the other clique far more often than that clique they rail against strawman's them. You might not see it, but this is the reality.

You're a Canadian. You shouldn't force yourself to think in that silly "there can be only two sides to a debate" way of thinking our poor Americans friends are forced to endure under. GCF has the non-interventionism policy in common with most of the (up untill recently) Trump supporters. While Monte has been criticising the Assad regime, I don't recall him arguing for military intervention, either. Penner, I can't recall. Kath seems to be in favor of military intervention.

[/quote]I don't think there are only two sides to a debate. I am pointing at tendencies in group of people who don't agree on every issue, but on the issue of Trump they go lumping in everyone who doesn't agree with all of their criticisms of him as Trump sycophants expressing opinions that only Trump sycophants would have, even when they are totally off the mark.

[StCapps]

they lack the fortitude to debate here with retreating to a safe space where everyone is nice and civil.

I've yet to come across a political forum where everyone is nice but once you start to treat civility as a weakness honest debate becomes really difficult. Name calling does not strengthen your argument, it does the opposite....

No honest debate only becomes difficult for you because you can't take a few insults without getting butthurt. It doesn't become difficult for the rest of us who aren't so thin skinned.

Being civil isn't a weakness, but getting so frazzled by others not behaving civilly is a weakness, especially when you are no paragon of civility yourself.

[Montegriffo]

Do you really need me to quote your faggot ass doing just that not two weeks ago??

You are butthurt because you can't imprison people you disagree with. You actually admitted that. Go fuck yourself.

Civil as ever DSL,
I'm not denying that I post mainly elsewhere now. I am asking you to prove that I've gone to ''the liberal forums where opposing views are safely banned''.
PF.com is neither Liberal nor does it ban opposing views. It has many far right, anti-immigrant,lefty hating
posters. The main difference is that name calling and hateful words like faggot has penalties and thread derailing is frowned upon .

Dude, you are NEVER civil. I tried being civil with you for months, ignoring constant insults from you, to no avail.

So you are not going to back up your statement about Liberal forums where opposing views are banned. Instead you are going to fall back on accusing me of being uncivil and claim victimhood.
On the previous page you have offered to ''quote my faggot ass'' called me ''butthurt'' and told me to ''go fuck myself'' whereas I have remained civil.......

[Okeefenokee]

didnt nuke get banned in a matter of days?

[Montegriffo]

didnt nuke get banned in a matter of days?

Nuke seems to have been banned because he was on a blacklist. Nothing he posted broke the rules.

This is the op of a thread and this guy is not banned yet, another guy has Hitler as his avatar not banned either. So Liberal safe space? Banned for opposing views?

No doubt this will get me labeled as an anti-semite. But the holocaust wasn't what you have heard or continue to hear. I will show you some pictures to prove my point. The first is of two plaques. The one on the left used to be at the holocaust memorial museum in Auschwitz. It says 4 million jews were murdered there. Though it is a little hard to read, the one on the right that is there now says that 1.5 million jews died there. (And even that is a vast overestimate) And if the deaths at that jewish internment camp were so overstated, you can bet your ass that they were at all of the other internment camps.

The next pictures I will show you are of newspaper articles that appeared in various newspapers years before WW II. They speak of various bad things happening to 6 million jews. You would have to be a major sucker to believe the same sort of crap about the holocaust. And there were no gas chambers! I will next show you two documents. One of which was from the International Red Cross. They tell what the real death toll was. Be sure to take note of when they were created.

Next, Auschwitz was said to have been the worst of the worst "death camp." I will show you a couple pictures of a swimming pool they had for inmates there. Not exactly the type of thing you would expect to see at a "killing factory," is it.

[StCapps]

didnt nuke get banned in a matter of days?

Nuke seems to have been banned because he was on a blacklist. Nothing he posted broke the rules.

That's even worse.

[Martin Hash]

A "blacklist"?! Jesus-fucking-Christ.

"Moderated forums are for pussies, and Twitter is for cunts." - me

p.s. I don't consider Monte a pussy. He's no GCF of thick skin, but he's ok in unmoderated blood-letting.

[TheReal_ND]

I didn't even know I was banned until he said he noticed I deleted my account. When I checked I was shadow banned but my account was still visible.

[Hwen Hoshino]

In what way did new blood improve the DCF?

Always looking for another Smitty.

p.s. ooky is the best representative of environmental issues but I'd don't consider her a Lefty. Kath neither. In fact, this forum never had a real Lefty, the SJW kind.
p.p.s. And Nukedog is fun to read. (The unmedicated one.)

How does somebody who want to hang socialists for their beliefs improve any forum?

But what if they are persistent, nobody is paying me to post here.

In what way did new blood improve the DCF?

Only Martin Hash can decide if you get thrown out or not. Anybody else can only throw words at you and nothing else. So what if they are persistent? Then you simply persistently ignore them, persistently insult them in return or persistently show yourself as the better guy and respond like a civil and well-mannered person: Whatever suits your preference.

So, street gang and steppe rules?

[BjornP]

But what if they are persistent, nobody is paying me to post here.

In what way did new blood improve the DCF?

Only Martin Hash can decide if you get thrown out or not. Anybody else can only throw words at you and nothing else. So what if they are persistent? Then you simply persistently ignore them, persistently insult them in return or persistently show yourself as the better guy and respond like a civil and well-mannered person: Whatever suits your preference.

So, street gang and steppe rules?

Unless the other forum-goers here are doing drive-by's at your house or invading and slaughtering your neighbourhood with mounted archers because you post something they don't like,.....no.