Any Dancarlin Forum April 1st stunts?

[Speaker to Animals]

Only a supreme faggot throws around accusations like that without substantive proof.

The butthurt people I encounter on this forum are upset Trump won, upset they can no longer bully or censor their way into being the only voices heard, and threaten to run off to the liberal forums where opposing views are safely banned so they don't get exposed.

Since you would clearly not wish to be labelled a supreme faggot I look forward to your proof that anyone has run off to ''the liberal forums where opposing views are safely banned''.
If that is a reference to me going to PF.com I will expect evidence to support your claim......
I can start posting the endless anti-Islamic, left hating, holocaust denying gun loving messages that appear there in their 1000s if you like......

Do you really need me to quote your faggot ass doing just that not two weeks ago??

You are butthurt because you can't imprison people you disagree with. You actually admitted that. Go fuck yourself.

[StCapps]

Only a supreme faggot throws around accusations like that without substantive proof.

The butthurt people I encounter on this forum are upset Trump won, upset they can no longer bully or censor their way into being the only voices heard, and threaten to run off to the liberal forums where opposing views are safely banned so they don't get exposed.

Since you would clearly not wish to be labelled a supreme faggot I look forward to your proof that anyone has run off to ''the liberal forums where opposing views are safely banned''.
If that is a reference to me going to PF.com I will expect evidence to support your claim......
I can start posting the endless anti-Islamic, left hating, holocaust denying gun loving messages that appear there in their 1000s if you like......

Do you really need me to quote your faggot ass doing just that not two weeks ago??

You are butthurt because you can't imprison people you disagree with. You actually admitted that. Go fuck yourself.

You both call each other names, but that doesn't mean either of you is trying to shut down the conversation, though you both often use that as an excuse to refuse to debate each other.

How about you two knock that off? The only reason that I could think of why you both wouldn't agree to do that is that one or both of you is afraid that you'll lose the argument if you actually had one. Or you can go back to strawman duel, you're choice.

[Montegriffo]

Only a supreme faggot throws around accusations like that without substantive proof.

The butthurt people I encounter on this forum are upset Trump won, upset they can no longer bully or censor their way into being the only voices heard, and threaten to run off to the liberal forums where opposing views are safely banned so they don't get exposed.

Since you would clearly not wish to be labelled a supreme faggot I look forward to your proof that anyone has run off to ''the liberal forums where opposing views are safely banned''.
If that is a reference to me going to PF.com I will expect evidence to support your claim......
I can start posting the endless anti-Islamic, left hating, holocaust denying gun loving messages that appear there in their 1000s if you like......

Do you really need me to quote your faggot ass doing just that not two weeks ago??

You are butthurt because you can't imprison people you disagree with. You actually admitted that. Go fuck yourself.

Civil as ever DSL,
I'm not denying that I post mainly elsewhere now. I am asking you to prove that I've gone to ''the liberal forums where opposing views are safely banned''.
PF.com is neither Liberal nor does it ban opposing views. It has many far right, anti-immigrant,lefty hating
posters. The main difference is that name calling and hateful words like faggot has penalties and thread derailing is frowned upon .

[StCapps]

The main difference is that name calling and hateful words like faggot has penalties and thread derailing is frowned upon .

Sounds like banning opposing views to me because they don't like the tone. You need to learn to get over "hateful words" and adopt a more "sticks and stones" attitude, faggot.

[Montegriffo]

The main difference is that name calling and hateful words like faggot has penalties and thread derailing is frowned upon .

Sounds like banning opposing views to me because they don't like the tone. You need to learn to get over "hateful words" and adopt a more "sticks and stones" attitude, faggot.

You are perfectly able to have opposing views so long as you behave in a civil manner. We are not children and name calling has no place in civil debate. To me it is just a sign that you have run out of arguments.

If I were gay and was reading this forum how likely do you think it would be that I would join in?

[Martin Hash]

Monte, dude, you should know sanctimonious posturing is a no-no, but I await to see how this particular debating tactic works out. Maybe?

[StCapps]

You are perfectly able to have opposing views so long as you behave in a civil manner. We are not children and name calling has no place in civil debate. To me it is just a sign that you have run out of arguments.

If I were gay and was reading this forum how likely do you think it would be that I would join in?

It is only a sign that you have run out of arguments if it's the only argument you are making. If you are making arguments and inserting an insult or two to liven things up that isn't running out of arguments.

Gay folks who aren't little bitches and can handle being called a mean word won't be deterred in the slightest, and those are the kind of folks we want around here. We should not be encouraging the recruitment of people who can't take an insult because they overvalue civility, they'll never last they lack the fortitude to debate here with retreating to a safe space where everyone is nice and civil.

[BjornP]

Reactionaries are not exclusive to one side of the political spectrum.

http://dictionary.cambridge.org/diction ... eactionary

Because I don't lump them in as Hillary supporters just because I don't agree with them, yet they lump me in as a Trump supporter because I don't agree with them. I don't jump to crazy conclusions about their beliefs, but they sure are out to paint me as a Trump sychopant so they can write off my criticisms of their worst anti-Trump arguments. I'm probably wrong here and there about them, they couldn't be more off the mark about me if they tried.

Well, if it's any consolation, during the election I lumped you as a Trump sycophant. Doesn't meant I'd write off your criticisms, though. But, of course, I am an ubermensch of tolerance, understanding and compromise.

StA resorts to strawmen most often after he is being strawmanned. Most of the time he's retaliating, if you want him to strawman you less often than I suggest y'all stop strawmanning him at every turn.

*yawn* Fake news. He's been playing the victim for years, setting himself up as a victim everytime he's about to lose. I'm not surprised that he conned other people. Repeat a lie often enough and some people will accept it as truth.

The delusion isn't wearing off though. Kath and monte think we are Trump sycophants who just recently had our bubble burst but couldn't see any fault in him prior, and that was never even close to true at any point on this forum.

That's true for some. There were people who simply voted or declared that they would vote, for Trump as a nothing more than a fuck you to the establishment, or a the "at least he might drain the swamp" argument.

People who have criticized Trump haven't been accused of all being suckers of the "MSM fake news" every time these supposedly always-lying "fake news" reported a bad story about him?

For the most part, no. People usually get called out for being suckers for MSM fake news when it is warranted.

Nonsense. Look at the news about Russia and Syria, instead of just Trump. People think all (negative) news about Russia or Syria is fake news because they believe it's tied to some sort of MSM "fake news" culture, or conspiracy (admittedly only few believe in the latter).

The most pro-Trump people on this forum have criticized him repeatedly and they usually don't get called out for doing so because they pick their battles a whole lot more wisely than those who hate on Trump the most. That is the big difference.

You're right, they have criticized him on the online privacy issue and - for some reason - they got surprised that he wouldn't get less involved in the ME despite promising excatly that during his campaign (on "annihilating" ISIS) and that he'd increase US military might. That's lately, though.

Nah monte, Kath and ooky are the biggest victim mentality pussies on this forum and I consider it nothing more than a coincidence that they are anti-Trumpers. StA, Okee and SilverEagle can't hold a candle to those three.

Fake news, again. Seriously, what forum are you reading? SilverEagle threatened to curb-stomp Atanamis not too long ago for calling him out on his thin-skinned intolerance of "gay propaganda". Doesn't get more hysterical than that.

Oh it's full blown clique, Kath, montegriffo, ooky, grumpycatface, penner, etc.
They honestly think the only reason anyone would find fault with their criticisms of Trump is because they are his sycophants, if they weren't his sycophants than they would be applauding their worst arguments against Trump instead of defending him for such nonsense. It's fucking ridiculous and they strawman the other clique far more often than that clique they rail against strawman's them. You might not see it, but this is the reality.

You're a Canadian. You shouldn't force yourself to think in that silly "there can be only two sides to a debate" way of thinking our poor Americans friends are forced to endure under. GCF has the non-interventionism policy in common with most of the (up untill recently) Trump supporters. While Monte has been criticising the Assad regime, I don't recall him arguing for military intervention, either. Penner, I can't recall. Kath seems to be in favor of military intervention.

[Speaker to Animals]

Since you would clearly not wish to be labelled a supreme faggot I look forward to your proof that anyone has run off to ''the liberal forums where opposing views are safely banned''.
If that is a reference to me going to PF.com I will expect evidence to support your claim......
I can start posting the endless anti-Islamic, left hating, holocaust denying gun loving messages that appear there in their 1000s if you like......

Do you really need me to quote your faggot ass doing just that not two weeks ago??

You are butthurt because you can't imprison people you disagree with. You actually admitted that. Go fuck yourself.

Civil as ever DSL,
I'm not denying that I post mainly elsewhere now. I am asking you to prove that I've gone to ''the liberal forums where opposing views are safely banned''.
PF.com is neither Liberal nor does it ban opposing views. It has many far right, anti-immigrant,lefty hating
posters. The main difference is that name calling and hateful words like faggot has penalties and thread derailing is frowned upon .

Dude, you are NEVER civil. I tried being civil with you for months, ignoring constant insults from you, to no avail.

[Montegriffo]

they lack the fortitude to debate here with retreating to a safe space where everyone is nice and civil.

I've yet to come across a political forum where everyone is nice but once you start to treat civility as a weakness honest debate becomes really difficult. Name calling does not strengthen your argument, it does the opposite....