Would You Choose More Money or Less Hours?

User avatar
SuburbanFarmer
Posts: 25278
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
Location: Ohio

Re: Would You Choose More Money or Less Hours?

Post by SuburbanFarmer » Sun Jan 08, 2017 9:22 am

Martin Hash wrote:I don't debate socialists. Nothing personal, I just wish you didn't live in my Liberty nation.

p.s. Seriously, move to Canada.
Dude. You are a socialist. Look in the mirror and repeat, if you need to.
SJWs are a natural consequence of corporatism.

Formerly GrumpyCatFace

https://youtu.be/CYbT8-rSqo0

User avatar
Martin Hash
Posts: 18718
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm

Re: Would You Choose More Money or Less Hours?

Post by Martin Hash » Sun Jan 08, 2017 9:28 am

GrumpyCatFace wrote:
Martin Hash wrote:I don't debate socialists. Nothing personal, I just wish you didn't live in my Liberty nation.

p.s. Seriously, move to Canada.
Dude. You are a socialist. Look in the mirror and repeat, if you need to.
Read a couple of my books, it might straighten out your confused thinking.

p.s. Or read my podcasts.
p.p.s. I don't usually use emojis, but probably need one here to show the last couple posts are light-hearted. :)
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change

User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18718
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: Would You Choose More Money or Less Hours?

Post by Montegriffo » Sun Jan 08, 2017 9:33 am

GrumpyCatFace wrote:
Martin Hash wrote:I don't debate socialists. Nothing personal, I just wish you didn't live in my Liberty nation.

p.s. Seriously, move to Canada.
Dude. You are a socialist. Look in the mirror and repeat, if you need to.
Isn't the whole point of liberty the freedom to express any opinion? I'm not really sure Martin knows what a liberty nation is as it is often the expression he uses as an excuse to end debate.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Would You Choose More Money or Less Hours?

Post by Speaker to Animals » Sun Jan 08, 2017 11:23 am

Montegriffo wrote:130 posts in and it is still bugging me, I can't stay silent any more.
It's FEWER hours not less hours. My gears are grinding my nerves are shattered. Please put it right I just can't take it any more.

FEWER

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARGH :angry-screaming: :angry-steamingears:

I would like to expand on this post farther. The affect of this misuse of language makes me nauseous.

Okeefenokee
Posts: 12950
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:27 pm
Location: The Great Place

Re: Would You Choose More Money or Less Hours?

Post by Okeefenokee » Sun Jan 08, 2017 11:32 am

Martin Hash wrote:Wealth MUST be redistributed: it's a mathematical fact unless aristocracies don't bother you. The goal is most-liberty-to-most-people, and liberty is tied to opportunity & opportunity is tied to wealth. Since I'm a liberty guy, I'd rather the owner of wealth did the redistribution rather than government, so if you're a billionaire, make a 1000 people millionaires when you kick the bucket. Average Joes would actually root for rich people because there's always a chance they could get some of the money.
You've got 80 years to take a person's money from them. If you can't squeeze as much as you like from them in that time, too bad.
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Dumb slut partied too hard and woke up in a weird house. Ran out the door, weeping for her failed life choices, concerned townsfolk notes her appearance and alerted the fuzz.

viewtopic.php?p=60751#p60751

User avatar
jbird4049
Posts: 1117
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 8:56 pm

Re: Would You Choose More Money or Less Hours?

Post by jbird4049 » Sun Jan 08, 2017 12:33 pm

Speaker to Animals wrote:
Montegriffo wrote:130 posts in and it is still bugging me, I can't stay silent any more.
It's FEWER hours not less hours. My gears are grinding my nerves are shattered. Please put it right I just can't take it any more.

FEWER

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARGH :angry-screaming: :angry-steamingears:

I would like to expand on this post farther. The affect of this misuse of language makes me nauseous.
Well my peeve is using "way" instead of "far" or "much".

Debating, or studying, the use, or misuse of language aint really my thing, but it might be nice to language section like there is for the 4th amendment.
The blood-dimmed tide is loosed, and everywhere
The ceremony of innocence is drowned;
The best lack all conviction, while the worst
Are full of passionate intensity.

User avatar
jbird4049
Posts: 1117
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 8:56 pm

Re: Would You Choose More Money or Less Hours?

Post by jbird4049 » Sun Jan 08, 2017 12:39 pm

Martin Hash wrote:I don't debate socialists. Nothing personal, I just wish you didn't live in my Liberty nation.

p.s. Seriously, move to Canada.
You do know I'm a socialist, or at least to the left of Bernie Sanders, yes? :)
The blood-dimmed tide is loosed, and everywhere
The ceremony of innocence is drowned;
The best lack all conviction, while the worst
Are full of passionate intensity.

User avatar
jbird4049
Posts: 1117
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 8:56 pm

Re: Would You Choose More Money or Less Hours?

Post by jbird4049 » Sun Jan 08, 2017 12:53 pm

Speaker to Animals wrote:
Martin Hash wrote:
Speaker to Animals wrote:It's fine because it's not your money.
"All money is government money." - me

You own your dick & your imagination, that's about all.

Okay. Then people will buy tangible assets instead.

The address of these issues ought to happen upfront, not after the fact. Confiscatory policies, in my opinion, signal decline. It means the ruling elite have nothing left to keep the ship afloat.
What is the solution then?

The very massive, and unfair, distribution of wealth caused the Western Roman Empire, the French Revolution, the Gilded Age, the Russian Revolution (although that was really helped by the First World War). Hell, just look at the unrest in various countries today.

As I said before, wealth equal power equals success. The lack of wealth equals powerlessness equals failure. If we do not start seriously address the unbalance in our country, now, there will be unrest, perhaps, just perhaps up to civil war. Just look at Trump, Clinton, and Sanders. They are symptoms.
The blood-dimmed tide is loosed, and everywhere
The ceremony of innocence is drowned;
The best lack all conviction, while the worst
Are full of passionate intensity.

User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18718
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: Would You Choose More Money or Less Hours?

Post by Montegriffo » Sun Jan 08, 2017 1:06 pm

Speaker to Animals wrote:
Montegriffo wrote:130 posts in and it is still bugging me, I can't stay silent any more.
It's FEWER hours not less hours. My gears are grinding my nerves are shattered. Please put it right I just can't take it any more.

FEWER

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARGH :angry-screaming: :angry-steamingears:

I would like to expand on this post farther. The affect of this misuse of language makes me nauseous.
Don't let me stop you...
To be honest I was mostly joking, I mean it is bugging me and it is incorrect but it isn't confusing as the meaning is still clear.
There are worse cases but I'm not really a grammar Nazi so I normally let it slide.
Martin's response about "less" being a synonym for "time" made no sense at all so I assumed he meant to say "hours" was a synonym for "time". "Less time" is perfectly correct so I guess he was right in the end even if he was actually being completely incomprehensible. :lol:
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image

User avatar
Martin Hash
Posts: 18718
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm

Re: Would You Choose More Money or Less Hours?

Post by Martin Hash » Sun Jan 08, 2017 3:59 pm

I'm coming to the opinion that many people accept the Nouveau Aristocracy because without Inheritance Taxes, it ain't going anywhere. There must be a genetic predisposition towards having Classes that overrides indoctrination, or perhaps a bias against them is no longer taught?
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change