The Official Unofficial Rules

User avatar
Fife
Posts: 15157
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:47 am

Re: The Official Unofficial Rules

Post by Fife » Thu Dec 08, 2016 2:12 pm

I respectfully dissent.

This space is the private property of BroHash. What do you cede to the rabble, Martin?
Top
Hwen Hoshino
Posts: 1819
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 1:52 am

Re: The Official Unofficial Rules

Post by Hwen Hoshino » Sun Dec 11, 2016 7:09 am

What about nudity in avatars? I would probably do it every now and then, but not for shock value. Only if i liked the image from a movie or a comic book.
Top
User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18695
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: The Official Unofficial Rules

Post by Montegriffo » Sun Dec 11, 2016 7:15 am

Hwen Hoshino wrote:What about nudity in avatars? I would probably do it every now and then, but not for shock value. Only if i liked the image from a movie or a comic book.
STOP WATCHING SO MUCH PORN and get some therapy.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image
Top
Hwen Hoshino
Posts: 1819
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 1:52 am

Re: The Official Unofficial Rules

Post by Hwen Hoshino » Sun Dec 11, 2016 7:53 am

Montegriffo wrote:
Hwen Hoshino wrote:What about nudity in avatars? I would probably do it every now and then, but not for shock value. Only if i liked the image from a movie or a comic book.
STOP WATCHING SO MUCH PORN and get some therapy.
Nudity=porn. From which Amish village do you come from?
Top
User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18695
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: The Official Unofficial Rules

Post by Montegriffo » Sun Dec 11, 2016 8:07 am

Proud agnostic with complete foreskin as it happens. Just trying to point out that I don't suppose many people would want to see nude pics posted here. As I am the only person who has bothered to answer I will speak for all until contradicted.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image
Top
User avatar
SuburbanFarmer
Posts: 25087
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
Location: Ohio

Re: The Official Unofficial Rules

Post by SuburbanFarmer » Sun Dec 11, 2016 9:25 am

Montegriffo wrote:Proud agnostic with complete foreskin as it happens. Just trying to point out that I don't suppose many people would want to see nude pics posted here. As I am the only person who has bothered to answer I will speak for all until contradicted.
Back to the foreskin again...

Artistic nudity is fine, I think, but I don't just want to see a giant shlong on the sidebar.
SJWs are a natural consequence of corporatism.

Formerly GrumpyCatFace

https://youtu.be/CYbT8-rSqo0
Top
User avatar
Ex-California
Posts: 4114
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 11:37 pm

Re: The Official Unofficial Rules

Post by Ex-California » Sun Dec 11, 2016 9:45 am

Also, a lot of us post at work.

I don't need that. Also its immature
No man's life, liberty, or property are safe while the legislature is in session
Top
User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18695
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: The Official Unofficial Rules

Post by Montegriffo » Sun Dec 11, 2016 9:52 am

GrumpyCatFace wrote:
Montegriffo wrote:Proud agnostic with complete foreskin as it happens. Just trying to point out that I don't suppose many people would want to see nude pics posted here. As I am the only person who has bothered to answer I will speak for all until contradicted.
Back to the foreskin again...

Artistic nudity is fine, I think, but I don't just want to see a giant shlong on the sidebar.
You, me and Nuke can search for "artistic" nudity on our own time ;)
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image
Top
Hwen Hoshino
Posts: 1819
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 1:52 am

Re: The Official Unofficial Rules

Post by Hwen Hoshino » Sun Dec 11, 2016 10:04 am

AndrewBennett wrote:Also, a lot of us post at work.

I don't need that. Also its immature
Why would it be immature the way i would do it? Why would it be more immature than a popular meme or a partisan taunt in avatar form?
Montegriffo wrote:Proud agnostic with complete foreskin as it happens. Just trying to point out that I don't suppose many people would want to see nude pics posted here. As I am the only person who has bothered to answer I will speak for all until contradicted.
Pics to ogle, no interested. Avatar, could not care less. Let your freak flag fly.
Top
User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18695
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: The Official Unofficial Rules

Post by Montegriffo » Sun Dec 11, 2016 3:48 pm

Hwen Hoshino wrote: could not care less.
Am starting to feel the same way about you.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image
Top

Return to “Welcome”