No rules that I know of, you are on your own recognizant. I support free speech.Hwen Hoshino wrote:I guess newbies might want to know.
IMO, your signature pic is in poor taste.
No rules that I know of, you are on your own recognizant. I support free speech.Hwen Hoshino wrote:I guess newbies might want to know.
Free speech yesterday, today, forever.C-Mag wrote:No rules that I know of, you are on your own recognizant. I support free speech.Hwen Hoshino wrote:I guess newbies might want to know.
IMO, your signature pic is in poor taste.
Swastikas = cool?GrumpyCatFace wrote:More importantly, it could be exposed to a passing boss or coworker.
C-Mag wrote:No rules that I know of, you are on your own recognizant. I support free speech.Hwen Hoshino wrote:I guess newbies might want to know.
IMO, your signature pic is in poor taste.
"An admission against interest is an exception to the hearsay rule which allows a person to testify to a statement of another that reveals something incriminating, embarassing, or otherwise damaging to the maker of the statement. It is allowed into evidence on the theory that the lack of incentive to make a damaging statement is an indication of the statement's reliability."GrumpyCatFace wrote:More importantly, it could be exposed to a passing boss or coworker.
Ain't you Mr Stem--a caped crusader of the IT department? Why don't you just make the offending sig line go *poof* like I did? You can also send Monty's stupid Treguavara back to a more deserving century.GrumpyCatFace wrote:More importantly, it could be exposed to a passing boss or coworker.
I already did. But not all of us are as saavy on the computer machines.Alexander PhiAlipson wrote:Ain't you Mr Stem--a caped crusader of the IT department? Why don't you just make the offending sig line go *poof* like I did? You can also send Monty's stupid Treguavara back to a more deserving century.GrumpyCatFace wrote:More importantly, it could be exposed to a passing boss or coworker.