DCF Refugee Internment Camp

User avatar
TheReal_ND
Posts: 26035
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:23 pm

Re: DCF Refugee Internment Camp

Post by TheReal_ND » Sat Feb 04, 2017 10:22 am

Hwen Hoshino wrote:
California wrote:So average citizens decide whether war happens or not?

News to me
Recently, in the more developed countries. Yep.
It's true. We have Internet now.

User avatar
Ex-California
Posts: 4116
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 11:37 pm

Re: DCF Refugee Internment Camp

Post by Ex-California » Sat Feb 04, 2017 11:08 am

TheReal_ND wrote:
Hwen Hoshino wrote:
California wrote:So average citizens decide whether war happens or not?

News to me
Recently, in the more developed countries. Yep.
It's true. We have Internet now.
You guys are kidding yourself if you think that we have any say. There's some truth to DSL's explanation, but the movement isn't like a river, its like a glacier.

The opinion of the ones holding the money matters a lot more than the opinion of us proles.
No man's life, liberty, or property are safe while the legislature is in session

Hwen Hoshino
Posts: 1819
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 1:52 am

Re: DCF Refugee Internment Camp

Post by Hwen Hoshino » Sat Feb 04, 2017 11:23 am

California wrote:
TheReal_ND wrote:
Hwen Hoshino wrote: Recently, in the more developed countries. Yep.
It's true. We have Internet now.
You guys are kidding yourself if you think that we have any say. There's some truth to DSL's explanation, but the movement isn't like a river, its like a glacier.

The opinion of the ones holding the money matters a lot more than the opinion of us proles.
Not on a war with lots of casualties.

User avatar
Ex-California
Posts: 4116
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 11:37 pm

Re: DCF Refugee Internment Camp

Post by Ex-California » Sat Feb 04, 2017 11:37 am

Do you even History bro?
No man's life, liberty, or property are safe while the legislature is in session

Hwen Hoshino
Posts: 1819
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 1:52 am

Re: DCF Refugee Internment Camp

Post by Hwen Hoshino » Sat Feb 04, 2017 12:23 pm

California wrote:Do you even History bro?
Do you even recent history brah?

User avatar
Ex-California
Posts: 4116
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 11:37 pm

Re: DCF Refugee Internment Camp

Post by Ex-California » Sat Feb 04, 2017 12:24 pm

What's recent in your world?

In the real world, the two most costly and brutal wars in history are recent history.
No man's life, liberty, or property are safe while the legislature is in session

User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18718
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: DCF Refugee Internment Camp

Post by Montegriffo » Sat Feb 04, 2017 12:54 pm

California wrote:What's recent in your world?

In the real world, the two most costly and brutal wars in history are recent history.
In the real world it took several years both times for the politicians to wait for public opinion to be strong enough that they could declare war. In WWII it took a full on attack by the Japanese before opinion was strong enough in favour for you to join the war. Smaller lest costly wars in the ME not so much.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image

Penner
Posts: 3350
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:00 pm

Re: DCF Refugee Internment Camp

Post by Penner » Sat Feb 04, 2017 12:59 pm

Montegriffo wrote:
California wrote:What's recent in your world?

In the real world, the two most costly and brutal wars in history are recent history.
In the real world it took several years both times for the politicians to wait for public opinion to be strong enough that they could declare war. In WWII it took a full on attack by the Japanese before opinion was strong enough in favour for you to join the war. Smaller lest costly wars in the ME not so much.
But we didn't have an all volunteer army back then- we do now and did have one for the Iraq and Afganistan wars. That is a big difference in that the public isn't so much invested (or at least more distracted by) since there is no draft for random amounts of people to be drafted to fight in future wars.
Image

User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18718
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: DCF Refugee Internment Camp

Post by Montegriffo » Sat Feb 04, 2017 1:07 pm

Penner wrote:
Montegriffo wrote:
California wrote:What's recent in your world?

In the real world, the two most costly and brutal wars in history are recent history.
In the real world it took several years both times for the politicians to wait for public opinion to be strong enough that they could declare war. In WWII it took a full on attack by the Japanese before opinion was strong enough in favour for you to join the war. Smaller lest costly wars in the ME not so much.
But we didn't have an all volunteer army back then- we do now and did have one for the Iraq and Afganistan wars. That is a big difference in that the public isn't so much invested (or at least more distracted by) since there is no draft for random amounts of people to be drafted to fight in future wars.
Hey I'm just trying to counter the naive idea that politicians care nothing about public opinion when they commit to sending men to war. Don't go confusing things with totally relative facts.
If people haven't worked it out yet, what politicians are most interested in is re-election and unpopular wars are not good strategy for that.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image

Penner
Posts: 3350
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:00 pm

Re: DCF Refugee Internment Camp

Post by Penner » Sat Feb 04, 2017 1:22 pm

Montegriffo wrote:
Penner wrote:
Montegriffo wrote:
In the real world it took several years both times for the politicians to wait for public opinion to be strong enough that they could declare war. In WWII it took a full on attack by the Japanese before opinion was strong enough in favour for you to join the war. Smaller lest costly wars in the ME not so much.
But we didn't have an all volunteer army back then- we do now and did have one for the Iraq and Afganistan wars. That is a big difference in that the public isn't so much invested (or at least more distracted by) since there is no draft for random amounts of people to be drafted to fight in future wars.
Hey I'm just trying to counter the naive idea that politicians care nothing about public opinion when they commit to sending men to war. Don't go confusing things with totally relative facts.
If people haven't worked it out yet, what politicians are most interested in is re-election and unpopular wars are not good strategy for that.

Image
Image