The, "All Things English" thread

User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18695
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: The, "All Things English" thread

Post by Montegriffo » Wed Mar 06, 2019 7:34 am

:lol:
The hounds were all in fur coats.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image

User avatar
Hastur
Posts: 5297
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 2:43 am
Location: suiþiuþu

Re: The, "All Things English" thread

Post by Hastur » Wed Mar 06, 2019 8:16 am

Are you sure it was beagles b.t.w? Some kind of foxhounds would have been more appropriate.
Image

An nescis, mi fili, quantilla prudentia mundus regatur? - Axel Oxenstierna

Nie lügen die Menschen so viel wie nach einer Jagd, während eines Krieges oder vor Wahlen. - Otto von Bismarck

User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18695
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: The, "All Things English" thread

Post by Montegriffo » Wed Mar 06, 2019 8:29 am

Hastur wrote:
Wed Mar 06, 2019 8:16 am
Are you sure it was beagles b.t.w? Some kind of foxhounds would have been more appropriate.
Ah, you're right. They were Basset hounds. I got the names mixed up.

They are not allowed to hunt with dogs anymore so they set scent trails with aniseed and follow them.
If they happen to find a fox scent and follow that instead
no one seems to get arrested.
Pretty shitty way to cull foxes if you ask me.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image

User avatar
Hastur
Posts: 5297
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 2:43 am
Location: suiþiuþu

Re: The, "All Things English" thread

Post by Hastur » Wed Mar 06, 2019 8:34 am

Montegriffo wrote:
Wed Mar 06, 2019 8:29 am
Hastur wrote:
Wed Mar 06, 2019 8:16 am
Are you sure it was beagles b.t.w? Some kind of foxhounds would have been more appropriate.
Ah, you're right. They were Basset hounds. I got the names mixed up.

They are not allowed to hunt with dogs anymore so they set scent trails with aniseed and follow them.
If they happen to find a fox scent and follow that instead
no one seems to get arrested.
Pretty shitty way to cull foxes if you ask me.
Agreed. Foxes can be pests if there are too many of them but they are so adorable I couldn't see myself hurting one. I guess I would see it differently if I had chicken or rabbits.

My daughter's friend had one of her pet rabbits eaten by a fox. She kept them outside in a cage in the summer and the fox burrowed in.
Image

An nescis, mi fili, quantilla prudentia mundus regatur? - Axel Oxenstierna

Nie lügen die Menschen so viel wie nach einer Jagd, während eines Krieges oder vor Wahlen. - Otto von Bismarck

User avatar
BjornP
Posts: 3360
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 9:36 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark

Re: The, "All Things English" thread

Post by BjornP » Wed Mar 06, 2019 9:07 am

Montegriffo wrote:
Wed Mar 06, 2019 6:48 am
I guess this belongs here.

A toff on a horse with a lovely green velvet jacket just came into my field with a pack of about 30 beagles.
They are not on the scent of anything and it looks like a training exercise. The toff keeps muttering swear words under his breath and blowing his horn to call the hounds to him.
They seem to have moved on, only here for about 5 mins.

The crows are not fucking happy about it. :lol:
Now, when you say the toff came into "your field", are you saying he was riding on your land, without your permission? :think:
Fame is not flattery. Respect is not agreement.

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: The, "All Things English" thread

Post by Speaker to Animals » Wed Mar 06, 2019 9:20 am

English have weird slang. Apparently the gays are even weirder.

User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18695
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: The, "All Things English" thread

Post by Montegriffo » Wed Mar 06, 2019 9:46 am

BjornP wrote:
Wed Mar 06, 2019 9:07 am
Montegriffo wrote:
Wed Mar 06, 2019 6:48 am
I guess this belongs here.

A toff on a horse with a lovely green velvet jacket just came into my field with a pack of about 30 beagles.
They are not on the scent of anything and it looks like a training exercise. The toff keeps muttering swear words under his breath and blowing his horn to call the hounds to him.
They seem to have moved on, only here for about 5 mins.

The crows are not fucking happy about it. :lol:
Now, when you say the toff came into "your field", are you saying he was riding on your land, without your permission? :think:
Well it's not my land, it just happens to be where I live.
The farmer who owns it has always given his permission to the hunt to cross his land.
He lost his chickens to a fox about 6 months ago so I'm sure he would have been pleased if they had found a fox trail.
The hounds only really catch the older or slower foxes though, to cull them properly you need to shoot the younger breeding animals.
I think it's just a bit of fun for the toffs so they can charge around on their huge chasers pretending they still own the place.
About the only decent thing Blair did was ban it.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image

User avatar
BjornP
Posts: 3360
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 9:36 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark

Re: The, "All Things English" thread

Post by BjornP » Wed Mar 06, 2019 11:35 pm

Are all "toffs" members of the nobility, or does it just means generally snobby, pretentious twit? In either case, mandate that fox hunting toffers all must get professional pest control training. They'll get standard pay for vermin disposal, but to conform to higher their station, it shall be called a Lord Hunter's Due. They'll be the finest, dandiest and most noble rat catchers, fox bashers and roach snatchers in the land. :ugeek:
Fame is not flattery. Respect is not agreement.

User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18695
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: The, "All Things English" thread

Post by Montegriffo » Thu Mar 07, 2019 12:59 am

BjornP wrote:
Wed Mar 06, 2019 11:35 pm
Are all "toffs" members of the nobility, or does it just means generally snobby, pretentious twit? In either case, mandate that fox hunting toffers all must get professional pest control training. They'll get standard pay for vermin disposal, but to conform to higher their station, it shall be called a Lord Hunter's Due. They'll be the finest, dandiest and most noble rat catchers, fox bashers and roach snatchers in the land. :ugeek:
Toffs are often but not exclusively aristocratic.
I would rather we reclassified fox hunters as pests and hunted them down using packs of chavs with pit bull terriers.
Apparently, blah blah blah tradition counters any argument to eradicate them.
Our noble Romany with their tradition of cock fights and dog fighting don't seem to get the same concessions from the toffs in Parliament for some unaccountable reason.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image

User avatar
Hastur
Posts: 5297
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 2:43 am
Location: suiþiuþu

Re: The, "All Things English" thread

Post by Hastur » Thu Mar 07, 2019 1:36 am

The most exclusive hunt in England and a closely kept secret is The Annual Harrod Rat Shoot. Some very posh people with rat dogs, Jack Russels, Dachshunds, Westies, Yorkies etc. are invited down to the basement of the department store to hunt for rats.
Image

An nescis, mi fili, quantilla prudentia mundus regatur? - Axel Oxenstierna

Nie lügen die Menschen so viel wie nach einer Jagd, während eines Krieges oder vor Wahlen. - Otto von Bismarck