US tests 'most dangerous nuclear weapon ever produced'

User avatar
SilverEagle
Posts: 2365
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 11:07 am

US tests 'most dangerous nuclear weapon ever produced'

Post by SilverEagle » Wed Aug 30, 2017 7:55 am

Smitty......could you explain to us why this would be the most dangerous nuclear weapon ever?


http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/847 ... rea-B61-12
There is a time for good men to do bad things.

For fuck sake, 1984 is NOT an instruction manual!

:character-bowser: __________ :character-mario: :character-luigi:

User avatar
SuburbanFarmer
Posts: 25080
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
Location: Ohio

Re: US tests 'most dangerous nuclear weapon ever produced'

Post by SuburbanFarmer » Wed Aug 30, 2017 7:59 am

The B61, which entered service in 1968, is currently part of the US Government’s ongoing 30-year, $1 trillion project to modernise its atomic stockpile..
:shock:
SJWs are a natural consequence of corporatism.

Formerly GrumpyCatFace

https://youtu.be/CYbT8-rSqo0

User avatar
Xenophon
Posts: 2713
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:41 am

Re: US tests 'most dangerous nuclear weapon ever produced'

Post by Xenophon » Wed Aug 30, 2017 8:06 am

It seems like it's being called "the most dangerous" because of the variation in yield. It's maximum is 50 KT, which is low compared to some of our nukes. This could be potentially used in a battlefield situation to attack a position and not have as much environmental damage due to the low yield.

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: US tests 'most dangerous nuclear weapon ever produced'

Post by Speaker to Animals » Wed Aug 30, 2017 8:08 am

What a ridiculous headline.

User avatar
Xenophon
Posts: 2713
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:41 am

Re: US tests 'most dangerous nuclear weapon ever produced'

Post by Xenophon » Wed Aug 30, 2017 8:09 am

Speaker to Animals wrote:What a ridiculous headline.
Agreed. I would've said, "The Most Tactical Nuke ever produced." But that doesn't really send you into a frothing panic like the word "dangerous."

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: US tests 'most dangerous nuclear weapon ever produced'

Post by Speaker to Animals » Wed Aug 30, 2017 8:12 am

Drumf is going to activate the cobalt-thorium G doomsday device!!!

That would have been more entertaining.

User avatar
Kazmyr
Posts: 811
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:33 am

Re: US tests 'most dangerous nuclear weapon ever produced'

Post by Kazmyr » Wed Aug 30, 2017 8:32 am

Speaker to Animals wrote:Drumf is going to activate the cobalt-thorium G doomsday device!!!

That would have been more entertaining.
Image
Martin Hash wrote:Liberty allows people to get their jollies any way they want. Just don't expect to masturbate with my lotion.

User avatar
SilverEagle
Posts: 2365
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 11:07 am

Re: US tests 'most dangerous nuclear weapon ever produced'

Post by SilverEagle » Wed Aug 30, 2017 8:47 am

Xenophon wrote:
Speaker to Animals wrote:What a ridiculous headline.
Agreed. I would've said, "The Most Tactical Nuke ever produced." But that doesn't really send you into a frothing panic like the word "dangerous."
Maybe they are saying the most dangerous because it's much more likely to be used due to it being a tactical nuke?
There is a time for good men to do bad things.

For fuck sake, 1984 is NOT an instruction manual!

:character-bowser: __________ :character-mario: :character-luigi:

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: US tests 'most dangerous nuclear weapon ever produced'

Post by Speaker to Animals » Wed Aug 30, 2017 8:49 am

It's more likely to be used because it's so limited, precise, and least dangerous of them. An F-15 driver can deliver that thing spot on target.

User avatar
Xenophon
Posts: 2713
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:41 am

Re: US tests 'most dangerous nuclear weapon ever produced'

Post by Xenophon » Wed Aug 30, 2017 9:11 am

Speaker to Animals wrote:It's more likely to be used because it's so limited, precise, and least dangerous of them. An F-15 driver can deliver that thing spot on target.
Could we see something with such a low yield be employed in battle? I think the media wimps could get on board with a nuke that has such a low impact on the environment.