Isn't "what you said is bigoted but I didn't say you were" just weaseling?

brewster
Posts: 1848
Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2016 6:33 pm

Isn't "what you said is bigoted but I didn't say you were" just weaseling?

Post by brewster » Thu Jun 01, 2017 9:54 am

Wanted to see what the word warriors here thought. I've had arguments contending that the fashionable Liberal trend of calling out what you said as racist, sexist, whatever, but denying they actually called YOU that, is just weaseling, and wanting to call you a name but not having to stand behind it. They'll even say it's to give you a chance to backpedal. But if you don't, then presumably it's OK to really call you whatever. This latest was a fellow Jew calling me anti-semitic.

I contend that you should just fucking make your argument. If you can't make it without name calling, then you don't have a very good argument.
We are only accustomed to dealing with like twenty online personas at a time so when we only have about ten people some people have to be strawmanned in order to advance our same relative go nowhere nonsense positions. -TheReal_ND

User avatar
TheReal_ND
Posts: 26030
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:23 pm

Re: Isn't "what you said is bigoted but I didn't say you were" just weaseling?

Post by TheReal_ND » Thu Jun 01, 2017 9:58 am

I'm bigoted AMA

User avatar
Martin Hash
Posts: 18260
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm

Re: Isn't "what you said is bigoted but I didn't say you were" just weaseling?

Post by Martin Hash » Thu Jun 01, 2017 10:01 am

I've always contended that The Left are the kids who were picked on in school, and their only weapon was insult, a tactic which they've carried into adulthood. The thing that is so effective about name-calling is that almost everyone goes on the defensive when they respond: defense is a lost argument. (Here at MHF, we practice Insult Debating as a response to the name-calling tactic.)

Personally, I never respond defensively to being called something. Normally, I ignore it but occasionally I'll respond with a clever masked insult, especially if the other person is so unaware that they don't know they're being taken-for-a-ride. It's the clued-in Lurkers you're entertaining.

p.s. Good to see you.
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change

brewster
Posts: 1848
Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2016 6:33 pm

Re: Isn't "what you said is bigoted but I didn't say you were" just weaseling?

Post by brewster » Thu Jun 01, 2017 10:08 am

Martin Hash wrote:The thing that is so effective about name-calling is that almost everyone goes on the defensive when they respond: defense is a lost argument.
Oh, but they DIDN'T call anyone a name, just what they said, and that's OK and feelgood. I argue exactly what you say, the target makes no distinction between themselves and their words being called out, no matter how the namecaller feels about it.
Martin Hash wrote:p.s. Good to see you.
The thing about being a moderate is you oscillate between the extremes when all there are is extremes. I get the crap kicked out of me no matter where I go!
We are only accustomed to dealing with like twenty online personas at a time so when we only have about ten people some people have to be strawmanned in order to advance our same relative go nowhere nonsense positions. -TheReal_ND

User avatar
DBTrek
Posts: 12241
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm

Re: Isn't "what you said is bigoted but I didn't say you were" just weaseling?

Post by DBTrek » Thu Jun 01, 2017 10:15 am

I'm not saying you're a murderer, I'm just saying your actions are murderous.
:lol:
"Hey varmints, don't mess with a guy that's riding a buffalo"

User avatar
Alexander PhiAlipson
Posts: 1411
Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2017 2:29 pm

Re: Isn't "what you said is bigoted but I didn't say you were" just weaseling?

Post by Alexander PhiAlipson » Thu Jun 01, 2017 10:54 am

Image
"She had yellow hair and she walked funny and she made a noise like... O my God, please don't kill me! "

User avatar
Hanarchy Montanarchy
Posts: 5991
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 1:54 am

Re: Isn't "what you said is bigoted but I didn't say you were" just weaseling?

Post by Hanarchy Montanarchy » Thu Jun 01, 2017 10:57 am

DBTrek wrote:I'm not saying you're a murderer, I'm just saying your actions are murderous.
:lol:
Reminds me of the joke about an architect that can design quality bridges his whole damn life, but guess what people call him if he sucks just one cock...
HAIL!

Her needs America so they won't just take his shit away like in some pussy non gun totting countries can happen.
-Hwen

User avatar
C-Mag
Posts: 28082
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm

Re: Isn't "what you said is bigoted but I didn't say you were" just weaseling?

Post by C-Mag » Thu Jun 01, 2017 11:08 am

Hanarchy Montanarchy wrote:
DBTrek wrote:I'm not saying you're a murderer, I'm just saying your actions are murderous.
:lol:
Reminds me of the joke about an architect that can design quality bridges his whole damn life, but guess what people call him if he sucks just one cock...
An Engineer ?

:shifty:
PLATA O PLOMO


Image


Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience

brewster
Posts: 1848
Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2016 6:33 pm

Re: Isn't "what you said is bigoted but I didn't say you were" just weaseling?

Post by brewster » Thu Jun 01, 2017 11:15 am

C-Mag wrote:
Hanarchy Montanarchy wrote:
DBTrek wrote:I'm not saying you're a murderer, I'm just saying your actions are murderous.
:lol:
Reminds me of the joke about an architect that can design quality bridges his whole damn life, but guess what people call him if he sucks just one cock...
An Engineer ?

:shifty:
Yeah, I don't get it either. Architects don't design bridges. An "exterior decorator"?
We are only accustomed to dealing with like twenty online personas at a time so when we only have about ten people some people have to be strawmanned in order to advance our same relative go nowhere nonsense positions. -TheReal_ND

User avatar
SuburbanFarmer
Posts: 25085
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
Location: Ohio

Re: Isn't "what you said is bigoted but I didn't say you were" just weaseling?

Post by SuburbanFarmer » Thu Jun 01, 2017 11:20 am

brewster wrote:Wanted to see what the word warriors here thought. I've had arguments contending that the fashionable Liberal trend of calling out what you said as racist, sexist, whatever, but denying they actually called YOU that, is just weaseling, and wanting to call you a name but not having to stand behind it. They'll even say it's to give you a chance to backpedal. But if you don't, then presumably it's OK to really call you whatever. This latest was a fellow Jew calling me anti-semitic.

I contend that you should just fucking make your argument. If you can't make it without name calling, then you don't have a very good argument.
Well, there is a difference between judging that a statement made was itself racist vs. judging someone's character to be racist.

Among the shady poker world I used to run in, it was pretty standard to say racist things all the time, so long as you said them about each race. This was done with and towards minority people at the table, and it was never thought that the person themselves was a racist. It's just a rougher sense of humor.

There's value in this, which I fear is being lost. Laughing about outrageous things is the easiest way to disarm them. See: Lisa Lampanelli comedy shows, Goodfellas, etc.
SJWs are a natural consequence of corporatism.

Formerly GrumpyCatFace

https://youtu.be/CYbT8-rSqo0