bye, felicia

User avatar
MilSpecs
Posts: 1852
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 1:13 pm
Location: Deep in the heart of Jersey

Re: bye, felicia

Post by MilSpecs » Fri Jan 20, 2017 6:16 pm

Speaker to Animals wrote:It's not that simple. There are not enough babies and toddlers for every family who wants to adopt. There are plenty of older children with a lot of baggage that nobody wants to adopt.

You can't look at it like demand for a newborn is the same as demand for a a thirteen year old who was born with fetal alcohol syndrome.
The entire point of adoption is to find homes for children, not to find children for adults.
:royalty-queen:

User avatar
Fife
Posts: 15157
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:47 am

Re: bye, felicia

Post by Fife » Fri Jan 20, 2017 6:23 pm

Not a zero sum game, mdj.

User avatar
clubgop
Posts: 7978
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm

Re: bye, felicia

Post by clubgop » Fri Jan 20, 2017 6:29 pm

The Conservative wrote:
Montegriffo wrote:
Speaker to Animals wrote:Looks like Jesus won.
Image
Yeah, right... and remind me again how the left has done their fair share of genocide of generations by legal means?

Oh, also... side note. Democrats were the ones that refused to give support to low income minorities originally because they were black... but hell, lets ignore that. Your meme rings true if we take all logic and thought off the table. :dance:
Yeah, WTF is that? I shouldn't stop the kid from getting in Montys windowless van with promises of candy because I am unwilling to put up the kids college tuition. Real moral high ground you got there.

User avatar
clubgop
Posts: 7978
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm

Re: bye, felicia

Post by clubgop » Fri Jan 20, 2017 6:29 pm

Fife wrote:Not a zero sum game, mdj.
Everything is to them. It's almost as if they don't understand how markets work.

User avatar
MilSpecs
Posts: 1852
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 1:13 pm
Location: Deep in the heart of Jersey

Re: bye, felicia

Post by MilSpecs » Fri Jan 20, 2017 6:31 pm

Fife wrote:Not a zero sum game, mdj.
I know people want infants, but it's secondary to ethical adoption practices. We shouldn't normalize a marketplace mentality about adoption (recognizing that it is a de facto market).
:royalty-queen:

User avatar
MilSpecs
Posts: 1852
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 1:13 pm
Location: Deep in the heart of Jersey

Re: bye, felicia

Post by MilSpecs » Fri Jan 20, 2017 6:37 pm

clubgop wrote:
Fife wrote:Not a zero sum game, mdj.
Everything is to them. It's almost as if they don't understand how markets work.
It's a shande for us all that it's a marketplace.
:royalty-queen:

User avatar
Fife
Posts: 15157
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:47 am

Re: bye, felicia

Post by Fife » Fri Jan 20, 2017 6:39 pm

MilSpecs wrote:
Fife wrote:Not a zero sum game, mdj.
I know people want infants, but it's secondary to ethical adoption practices. We shouldn't normalize a marketplace mentality about adoption (recognizing that it is a de facto market).
Why not, exactly?

User avatar
MilSpecs
Posts: 1852
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 1:13 pm
Location: Deep in the heart of Jersey

Re: bye, felicia

Post by MilSpecs » Fri Jan 20, 2017 6:41 pm

Because we long ago decided that it's unethical to buy and sell human beings.
:royalty-queen:

User avatar
Fife
Posts: 15157
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:47 am

Re: bye, felicia

Post by Fife » Fri Jan 20, 2017 6:43 pm

MilSpecs wrote:Because we long ago decided that it's unethical to buy and sell human beings.

? Those kids are property? OK, who do kids belong to?

User avatar
MilSpecs
Posts: 1852
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 1:13 pm
Location: Deep in the heart of Jersey

Re: bye, felicia

Post by MilSpecs » Fri Jan 20, 2017 6:49 pm

Fife wrote:
MilSpecs wrote:Because we long ago decided that it's unethical to buy and sell human beings.

? Those kids are property? OK, who do kids belong to?
If you practice adoption law then you know the answer to this better than I do. Until the birthparents sign their rights away and the state's designated time period has passed, the child presumptively 'belongs' to the birthparents. If rights have already been severed then the state determines where the child goes.
:royalty-queen: