The entire point of adoption is to find homes for children, not to find children for adults.Speaker to Animals wrote:It's not that simple. There are not enough babies and toddlers for every family who wants to adopt. There are plenty of older children with a lot of baggage that nobody wants to adopt.
You can't look at it like demand for a newborn is the same as demand for a a thirteen year old who was born with fetal alcohol syndrome.
bye, felicia
-
- Posts: 1852
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 1:13 pm
- Location: Deep in the heart of Jersey
Re: bye, felicia
-
- Posts: 15157
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:47 am
-
- Posts: 7978
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm
Re: bye, felicia
Yeah, WTF is that? I shouldn't stop the kid from getting in Montys windowless van with promises of candy because I am unwilling to put up the kids college tuition. Real moral high ground you got there.The Conservative wrote:Yeah, right... and remind me again how the left has done their fair share of genocide of generations by legal means?Montegriffo wrote:Speaker to Animals wrote:Looks like Jesus won.
Oh, also... side note. Democrats were the ones that refused to give support to low income minorities originally because they were black... but hell, lets ignore that. Your meme rings true if we take all logic and thought off the table.
-
- Posts: 7978
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm
Re: bye, felicia
Everything is to them. It's almost as if they don't understand how markets work.Fife wrote:Not a zero sum game, mdj.
-
- Posts: 1852
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 1:13 pm
- Location: Deep in the heart of Jersey
Re: bye, felicia
I know people want infants, but it's secondary to ethical adoption practices. We shouldn't normalize a marketplace mentality about adoption (recognizing that it is a de facto market).Fife wrote:Not a zero sum game, mdj.
-
- Posts: 1852
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 1:13 pm
- Location: Deep in the heart of Jersey
Re: bye, felicia
It's a shande for us all that it's a marketplace.clubgop wrote:Everything is to them. It's almost as if they don't understand how markets work.Fife wrote:Not a zero sum game, mdj.
-
- Posts: 15157
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:47 am
Re: bye, felicia
Why not, exactly?MilSpecs wrote:I know people want infants, but it's secondary to ethical adoption practices. We shouldn't normalize a marketplace mentality about adoption (recognizing that it is a de facto market).Fife wrote:Not a zero sum game, mdj.
-
- Posts: 1852
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 1:13 pm
- Location: Deep in the heart of Jersey
Re: bye, felicia
Because we long ago decided that it's unethical to buy and sell human beings.
-
- Posts: 15157
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:47 am
Re: bye, felicia
MilSpecs wrote:Because we long ago decided that it's unethical to buy and sell human beings.
? Those kids are property? OK, who do kids belong to?
-
- Posts: 1852
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 1:13 pm
- Location: Deep in the heart of Jersey
Re: bye, felicia
If you practice adoption law then you know the answer to this better than I do. Until the birthparents sign their rights away and the state's designated time period has passed, the child presumptively 'belongs' to the birthparents. If rights have already been severed then the state determines where the child goes.Fife wrote:MilSpecs wrote:Because we long ago decided that it's unethical to buy and sell human beings.
? Those kids are property? OK, who do kids belong to?