Yeah, I get it. You think that basically all states are already ethno-states. Some states actually have laws than enshrine ethnicity, some don't, but they are all ethno-states, kind of, because relatively similar people live in the area.Speaker to Animals wrote:Hanarchy Montanarchy wrote:The definition of ethno-state seems to shift around, so it is hard to say.
According to Speaker and Smitty, most states are ethno-states to one degree or another already, so what is the problem? Nobody wants for options of picking their favorite ethno-state.
Unless there is another definition of ethno-state that is a little more vigorous, which I suspect there is.
Derr
Most nations in the world are ethno-states, dude. Pretty much all the nations currently colonizing the western world are ethno-states. There exists no chance we could do to Mexico what the Mexicans are doing to us. The Mexicans would never allow an immigration policy that would render the Mexican people a minority in their own country. If a mob of illegal Anglos tried to illegally detain a Mexican legislator to make all sorts of incoherent demands of "rights" in Mexico, the Federalis would close with extreme brutality. Those Anglos wouldn't return to the states without marks.
Do you think Pakistan will let millions of white people migrate there and become "Pakistanis" just like actual Pakistanis? Of course not. Grow up and get real.
Ethno-state is the default status of humanity. We are a tribal species, genius. If you want to deny nature, then please find your own island to do it on instead of fucking up my country.
It is a definition of ethno-state.