Watch this,TheReal_ND wrote:IRA is commie trash
The Irish were a mistake that should have been deleted centuries ago
Think the full thing is on the tubes.
Watch this,TheReal_ND wrote:IRA is commie trash
The Irish were a mistake that should have been deleted centuries ago
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Dumb slut partied too hard and woke up in a weird house. Ran out the door, weeping for her failed life choices, concerned townsfolk notes her appearance and alerted the fuzz.
viewtopic.php?p=60751#p60751
Non-judicial executions is the dictionary definition of military force, the lawful judicial authority in Gibraltar stated that they were incapable of addressing the threat of a PIRA covert terrorist element plausibly in the process of executing a mass casualty bombing attack, and so, under British law, turned the responsibility over to HM armed forces, formally, in writing, as is required for the SAS to conduct any counterterrorism operation on British soil.DrYouth wrote:Non-judicial executions for all the right reasons...
Why worry?
Let's just look at British gas, sold off cheap for £450 million now earning that much per year for it's shareholders.DrYouth wrote:Montegriffo wrote:Then there was the selling off of the crown jewels on the cheap to her bankster buddies. Privatisation of all the money making utilities such as gas, water, electricity, telecoms, transport etc. These would all be earning big bucks for the exchequer now if still nationalised.OK...Cappy wrote:If they were nationalized they'd be far worse off than they are now. Public gas, water, electricity, telecoms and transport, give me a break, public utilities suck and Maggie did y'all a big favor by busting them up. That's not one of her biggest negatives, it's one of her biggest positives.
Just read this over.
For the most part a strong show off the mat for Cappy.
I think you put Monte back on his heels....
But I'm not clear about this point.
The truth is privatization is never clearly a win or loss.
I wonder if we could find some reliable stats on how that worked out for the UK....
From the crown jewels through gas to transport.... did the UK win or lose from privatizing?
The left tends to assume it's automatically a loss, and the right tends to assume the opposite.
I remain unconvinced either way.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-35601674Profits at British Gas have risen by 31% to £574m for the 12 months to 31 December as gas consumption increased.
The rise in operating profits compared with £439m for the previous year.
There was also the option to detain the unarmed IRA men on the rock. The choices were not limited to kill or allow to walk free to plant a bomb.Smitty-48 wrote:Non-judicial executions is the dictionary definition of military force, the lawful judicial authority in Gibraltar stated that they were incapable of addressing the threat of a PIRA covert terrorist element plausibly in the process of executing a mass casualty bombing attack, and so, under British law, turned the responsibility over to HM armed forces, formally, in writing, as is required for the SAS to conduct any counterterrorism operation on British soil.DrYouth wrote:Non-judicial executions for all the right reasons...
Why worry?
So we'll just have to put you down as being fundamentally opposed the armed forces of the Crown executing their duties to the Commander-in-Chief; noted, and filed for future reference.
The soldiers believed them to be about to remote detonate a bomb, and so decided not to risk it, nothing prohibited about that, c'est le guerre, it's called counterrevolutionary warfare for a reason, once law enforcement hands off to UKSF, it's a military operation, they're not bound to arrest them, although they did attempt to, but when the enemy declined to surrender immediately , they shot them, which, that's how it's done.Montegriffo wrote:There was also the option to detain the unarmed IRA men on the rock. The choices were not limited to kill or allow to walk free to plant a bomb.Smitty-48 wrote:Non-judicial executions is the dictionary definition of military force, the lawful judicial authority in Gibraltar stated that they were incapable of addressing the threat of a PIRA covert terrorist element plausibly in the process of executing a mass casualty bombing attack, and so, under British law, turned the responsibility over to HM armed forces, formally, in writing, as is required for the SAS to conduct any counterterrorism operation on British soil.DrYouth wrote:Non-judicial executions for all the right reasons...
Why worry?
So we'll just have to put you down as being fundamentally opposed the armed forces of the Crown executing their duties to the Commander-in-Chief; noted, and filed for future reference.