SilverEagle wrote:Okay that's your pic. I'm sticking with Holly.
Not as attractive as Ronda.
SilverEagle wrote:Okay that's your pic. I'm sticking with Holly.
All Holly has on Ronda is legs, that's about it. Ronda has a way nicer ass, not that she's that hot or anything but still notably hotter than Holm. I can't believe someone is honestly taking Holm's side on this one, very odd.SilverEagle wrote:Look Ronda is more attractive to you and Holly is more attractive to me. As far as muscle goes. I'm not threatened. I may not be in the best of shape anymore but I'm on old gym rat that can still bench over 300lbs. In fact I find Holly's legs sexy. Pencil legs on the typical model gross me out.
Yeah too muscular. It helps her career to be in that kind of physical shape but it certainly doesn't make her more attractive to men, that's for sure. It's not hard to find women fighters who are more attractive than Ronda, so not sure why anyone needs to bring Holm into the conversation when it comes to attractive women's fighters, that's a reach and a half.Speaker to Animals wrote:I think Holly Holm did one tren cycle too many, to be frank.
Yeah women and steroids do not mix, that shit will fuck up more than just their face. Men can take steroids and not abuse them with horrible side effects, Women on the other hand cannot, that shit just does not sync with their body chemistry.Speaker to Animals wrote:It's also what steroid use does to a woman's face.
It's not worth it for females.