Poll: Who Supports the Idea of a White Ethno State?

[Speaker to Animals]

Vets don't. Aussies are much loved by us. Hannarchy is out; Aussies are in.

NOOOOOOOOO!

This is why Dr. Phil recommends against ultimatums in relationships!

This has backfired.

[TheReal_ND]

Meh. The food is great.

[StCapps]

Meh. The food is great.

Not living in a White Ethno State does have it's upsides.

[Smitty-48]

Join us, Hanarchy, the Americans don't even want you anymore, the British Crown will take you back... if you learn French that is; you can always bypass our restrictive immigration policy, via our Ethno State, Dieu sauve la Reine.

[Montegriffo]

Shit, I am the only one around here to make a proactive case for diversity since I don't get all triggered when someone calls me a liberal.

I'm hurt, it's like you haven't read any of my posts. I've said many times that diversity is Americas strength.
Fuck it, I'm going to put on my Aussie hat,sing ''waltzing Matilda'', open a can of Fosters, throw another shrimp on the barbie and wait for the Ashes to start.

[StCapps]

Shit, I am the only one around here to make a proactive case for diversity since I don't get all triggered when someone calls me a liberal.

I'm hurt, it's like you haven't read any of my posts. I've said many times that diversity is Americas strength.

Diversity can be a strength and/or a weakness, y'all are just playing semantics.
/shrugs

[Hanarchy Montanarchy]

I am not convinced you are entirely clear on what the word reactionary means.

Shit, I am the only one around here to make a proactive case for diversity since I don't get all triggered when someone calls me a liberal.

Why would you make the case for a neutral term that can mean both the good kind of diversity and bad of diversity, all in the same term? You that into semantics?

It is a discussion forum. Semantics are sort of part of the deal.

Are you asking me "why" I would make that case in an existential, or ethical sense, or are you asking me why I would make that case in the context of this debate?

In the context of the discussion, the prompt was basically: does homogeneity increase quality of life? An argument had been made that it does; instead of just saying 'nuh uh... prove me wrong' I made an argument against the proposition, in the grand tradition of Lincoln-Douglass debate.

In the context of a larger ethical discussion, well, it was sort of illuminated already in a number of TL;DR posts I have contributed to this thread. I mean, golly, if ya'll really like reading and rereading different iterations of my positions, I could probably drum up another essay on the subject... lord knows I love the sound of my own voice.

[C-Mag]

OH MY GOD MAGNUM

That was actually from the short run series Tales of the Gold Monkey, John Hillerman played a Nazi villain in the South Pacific

[StCapps]

Diversity is neither inherently positive, or inherently negative, trying to pretend that it is, that's just dumb. That is not a meaningful conversation.

[Hanarchy Montanarchy]

Shit, I am the only one around here to make a proactive case for diversity since I don't get all triggered when someone calls me a liberal.

I'm hurt, it's like you haven't read any of my posts. I've said many times that diversity is Americas strength.
Fuck it, I'm going to put on my Aussie hat,sing ''waltzing Matilda'', open a can of Fosters, throw another shrimp on the barbie and wait for the Ashes to start.

That was more strutting braggadocio than literal. Don't poison yourself with that miserable piss-water out of spite just yet brother!