What’s LBW? And why would that help the bowler??Montegriffo wrote:Learn to duck or rely on wearing a good helmet. Sometimes the batsman is killed.GrumpyCatFace wrote: so just take a free headshot once in a while.
What happens if the batter and bowler both miss - no wicket hit? Just re-throw?
Yep, known as a dot ball (no score) a small victory for the bowler.
Unless it's an LBW.
International sports bar
-
- Posts: 25281
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Re: International sports bar
-
- Posts: 25281
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Re: International sports bar
What?Montegriffo wrote:Because if only one ran they could both end up at the same end.GrumpyCatFace wrote: But why are there two of them running?
Can the fielder just chuck it from the outside and hit a wicket?
Yes if the batsman is not in his crease, it's called a run out.
If the batsman only scores one run then the other batsman faces the next ball.
At the end of an over the batsman stay where they are and the next over is bowled from the other end by a different bowler.
-
- Posts: 4116
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 11:37 pm
Re: International sports bar
Its retard baseball
No man's life, liberty, or property are safe while the legislature is in session
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: International sports bar
Leg Before Wicket.GrumpyCatFace wrote:What’s LBW? And why would that help the bowler??Montegriffo wrote:Learn to duck or rely on wearing a good helmet. Sometimes the batsman is killed.GrumpyCatFace wrote: so just take a free headshot once in a while.
What happens if the batter and bowler both miss - no wicket hit? Just re-throw?
Yep, known as a dot ball (no score) a small victory for the bowler.
Unless it's an LBW.
If the ball hits your leg without first hitting your bat and the umpire decides it would otherwise have hit the stumps you are given out.
This is to stop the batsman simply standing in front of the stumps to prevent the ball hitting them.
Steven Fry with the full version...
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: International sports bar
Not sure what you don't get here.GrumpyCatFace wrote:What?Montegriffo wrote:Because if only one ran they could both end up at the same end.GrumpyCatFace wrote: But why are there two of them running?
Can the fielder just chuck it from the outside and hit a wicket?
Yes if the batsman is not in his crease, it's called a run out.
If the batsman only scores one run then the other batsman faces the next ball.
At the end of an over the batsman stay where they are and the next over is bowled from the other end by a different bowler.
There are two wickets (stumps) and two batsmen. Each set of 6 balls (an over) is bowled from one end only. Because the batsmen change ends when they run a single (or a three) the bowler can face either batsman during an over. If the batsman at the crease doesn't run or scores an even number of runs he faces the next ball, unless it is the last ball of an over. When the next bowler comes in he bowls his 6 balls from the other end.
If one batsman is better than the other he will try to remain at the crease to protect the weaker batsman. This means he will try to hit a single on the last ball of an over so he is at the other end to face the next bowler.
Last edited by Montegriffo on Thu Feb 01, 2018 6:20 am, edited 1 time in total.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: International sports bar
It's natural to attack things you don't understand but it is not a good look.California wrote:Its retard baseball
Cricket is the second most popular sport worldwide after soccer and cares little about your three word dismissal.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
- Posts: 4116
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 11:37 pm
Re: International sports bar
Don't care about soccer either. Anything that can end in a tie is flawedMontegriffo wrote:It's natural to attack things you don't understand but it is not a good look.California wrote:Its retard baseball
Cricket is the second most popular sport worldwide after soccer and cares little about your three word dismissal.
F1 the cars don't even crash into each other.
God damn you guys have a fucked up continent
No man's life, liberty, or property are safe while the legislature is in session
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: International sports bar
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
- Posts: 25281
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Re: International sports bar
Agree with the rest, but F1 is fucking awesome. Those guys used to die and get maimed constantly.California wrote:Don't care about soccer either. Anything that can end in a tie is flawedMontegriffo wrote:It's natural to attack things you don't understand but it is not a good look.California wrote:Its retard baseball
Cricket is the second most popular sport worldwide after soccer and cares little about your three word dismissal.
F1 the cars don't even crash into each other.
God damn you guys have a fucked up continent
-
- Posts: 4116
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 11:37 pm
Re: International sports bar
Yeah, it used to be brutal especially mid-century.
No man's life, liberty, or property are safe while the legislature is in session