Poll: Who Supports the Idea of a White Ethno State?

[Hanarchy Montanarchy]

I am going to try to explain this in the clearest way possible one more time:

The United States of America is a state founded on constitutional law.

That constitution does not make reference to race in regards to rights or citizenship.

Thus, the United States of America cannot be an ehtno-state.

Even if I allow for the broadest definition of an ethno-state, our particular state is, by design, excluded from that category of states.

Even if I accept that our country would have been better if there was an article of the constitution that said "Whites only, guys," it doesn't.

America was never an ethno-state. Period.

[Speaker to Animals]

I'm not against there existing a white ethno-state. Have at it. But you're implying that it should be created here, in America. And this is the worst place on the planet to even attempt such a thing. You'd have much better luck in Anywhere In Europe than trying to 'white-wash' America.

No, you just injected fallacious nonsense into the discussion. It's just stupid.

There is nothing about maintaining a white majority in America that precludes having *some* Mexicans. Maintaining a white majority doesn't mean we shut down your favorite burrito joint. That's what you think rises to the level of intelligent discourse? Really?

Take that "argument" to it's logical conclusion.: I like burritos a lot. Mexicans have contributed some great things to American culture. Therefore, let's replace the white demographic with a majority Mexican population.

It obviously does not follow from the proposition that some ethnic minority brought cultural enrichment that we should make them the demographic majority, and opposing that means you hate them and want to eliminate whatever culture they contributed. Do you not understand this?

Look at the title of the thread, idiot. Are you walking all the way back from “ethno-state”, to ‘there should be more white people’?

Not walking anything back. I define ethno-state as a majority demographic maintaining their majority; i.e. common sense.

[SuburbanFarmer]

No, you just injected fallacious nonsense into the discussion. It's just stupid.

There is nothing about maintaining a white majority in America that precludes having *some* Mexicans. Maintaining a white majority doesn't mean we shut down your favorite burrito joint. That's what you think rises to the level of intelligent discourse? Really?

Take that "argument" to it's logical conclusion.: I like burritos a lot. Mexicans have contributed some great things to American culture. Therefore, let's replace the white demographic with a majority Mexican population.

It obviously does not follow from the proposition that some ethnic minority brought cultural enrichment that we should make them the demographic majority, and opposing that means you hate them and want to eliminate whatever culture they contributed. Do you not understand this?

Look at the title of the thread, idiot. Are you walking all the way back from “ethno-state”, to ‘there should be more white people’?

Not walking anything back. I define ethno-state as a majority demographic maintaining their majority; i.e. common sense.

ethnostate
English
Etymology

ethno- +‎ state
Noun

ethnostate (plural ethnostates)

A political unit that is populated by and run in the interest of an ethnic group

[Speaker to Animals]

Look at the title of the thread, idiot. Are you walking all the way back from “ethno-state”, to ‘there should be more white people’?

Not walking anything back. I define ethno-state as a majority demographic maintaining their majority; i.e. common sense.

ethnostate
English
Etymology

ethno- +‎ state
Noun

ethnostate (plural ethnostates)

A political unit that is populated by and run in the interest of an ethnic group

E.g. immigration policies that maintain the dominance of said ethnic group..

Somedody cannot read good..

[SuburbanFarmer]

Not walking anything back. I define ethno-state as a majority demographic maintaining their majority; i.e. common sense.

ethnostate
English
Etymology

ethno- +‎ state
Noun

ethnostate (plural ethnostates)

A political unit that is populated by and run in the interest of an ethnic group

E.g. immigration policies that maintain the dominance of said ethnic group..

Somedody cannot read good..

....

I can't... Fuck it.

[K@th]

I keep hearing how good minorities have it here. What's the big fear?

[Speaker to Animals]

E.g. immigration policies that maintain the dominance of said ethnic group..

Somedody cannot read good..

....

I can't... Fuck it.

No, the correct response is that you can't read.

Read the definition you posted and tell me how that conflicts with enforcing an immigration policy that maintains a white majority.

[SuburbanFarmer]

E.g. immigration policies that maintain the dominance of said ethnic group..

Somedody cannot read good..

....

I can't... Fuck it.

No, the correct response is that you can't read.

Read the definition you posted and tell me how that conflicts with enforcing an immigration policy that maintains a white majority.

Skipping lunch doesn't conflict with starving to death. There is a difference, though.

[Speaker to Animals]

....

I can't... Fuck it.

No, the correct response is that you can't read.

Read the definition you posted and tell me how that conflicts with enforcing an immigration policy that maintains a white majority.

Skipping lunch doesn't conflict with starving to death. There is a difference, though.

Well, that's completely irrelevant to the discussion.

An ethno-state is a state which exists for a particular ethnic group and their interests. You just posted a definition of one. I think it works well. I am suggesting that our ethno-state, as it once existed, sought to preserve the white majority. That literally was our immigration policy until 1965.

Instead, you want to pretend like an ethno-state is something totally impossible to create and maintain because arguing with that straw man is all you have in you. You can't really debate with what I actually posted.

[SuburbanFarmer]

No, the correct response is that you can't read.

Read the definition you posted and tell me how that conflicts with enforcing an immigration policy that maintains a white majority.

Skipping lunch doesn't conflict with starving to death. There is a difference, though.

Well, that's completely irrelevant to the discussion.

No... I'm pointing out that an immigration policy - even completely closed off - would be only a small step to an ethno-state.

An ethno-state is a state which exists for a particular ethnic group and their interests. You just posted a definition of one. I think it works well. I am suggesting that our ethno-state, as it once existed, sought to preserve the white majority. That literally was our immigration policy until 1965.

Did they just forget to write any of that down?

Instead, you want to pretend like an ethno-state is something totally impossible to create and maintain because arguing with that straw man is all you have in you. You can't really debate with what I actually posted.

It's frighteningly easy to do, and maintain. Just not in America. Nazi's gave it a pretty good go, a couple generations ago.