F35 vs. A10?
-
- Posts: 36399
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: F35 vs. A10?
There is no bed wetting. This is the truth. That thing is a pile of shit and everybody in the Air Force community knows it.
I can't speak for the other two branches fucked in the ass by this program, but I have read enough grumblings from their camps to suspect it's even worse over there.
Dude, they are fucking having secret meetings to figure out how to fix this shit. That's not good, man.
-
- Posts: 36399
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am
Re: F35 vs. A10?
I don't personally put much stock in your claims of air force expertise.
If others find your fallacious nonsense to be believable, that is of course their prerogative.
If others find your fallacious nonsense to be believable, that is of course their prerogative.
Nec Aspera Terrent
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: F35 vs. A10?
Yeah, whatever. I don't support your Lockmart brochure, so I am sure you are going with the emotion of your investment decisions. We used to see that sort of thing all the time on the Yahoo stock message boards. It was hilarious to read that stuff. /shrug
I see you lost this thread vote, though.
I see you lost this thread vote, though.
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: F35 vs. A10?
Like this cuckservative crony right here:
However you want to parse that made-up term, "air dominance fighter", the F-35 is clearly not anything of the sort. It would get it's ass handed to it by a real fifth generation air superiority fighter. The F-35 is a support role fighter only.
Yet you can see how this little cuckservative weasel is trying to sneak in the term as if it's the same thing as an air superiority fighter. They obviously intended for this farce to replace the F-15C squadrons.
https://www.defenseone.com/business/201 ... e_today_nl“We are extremely concerned that, over the last few years, the DoD has underfunded the F-35 Program and relied on Congress to fund increases in production, sustainment, and modernization,” wrote the group, led by Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas. “In order to meet the overmatch and lethality goals laid out in the National Security Strategy, the DoD needs to make these investments in the F-35 to affordably deliver and operate this fifth-generation fighter fleet. The F-35 is the most affordable, lethal, and survivable air dominance fighter, and now is the time to double down on the program.”
However you want to parse that made-up term, "air dominance fighter", the F-35 is clearly not anything of the sort. It would get it's ass handed to it by a real fifth generation air superiority fighter. The F-35 is a support role fighter only.
Yet you can see how this little cuckservative weasel is trying to sneak in the term as if it's the same thing as an air superiority fighter. They obviously intended for this farce to replace the F-15C squadrons.
-
- Posts: 36399
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am
Re: F35 vs. A10?
It's a done deal, the F-35 program is not in peril, so I'm not concerned as an investor.
You are posting fallacious nonsense I am simply pointing it out.
Your claims of air force expertise are undermined by your lack of military bearing in the thread.
I think you were in the air force, but you are vastly exaggerating your area of expertise therein.
You are posting fallacious nonsense I am simply pointing it out.
Your claims of air force expertise are undermined by your lack of military bearing in the thread.
I think you were in the air force, but you are vastly exaggerating your area of expertise therein.
Nec Aspera Terrent
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: F35 vs. A10?
Maybe John Cornyn is talking shit like this because he received 91k from Lockheed Martin at least in 2012.
https://maplight.org/story/john-cornyns ... ry-donors/
That's what this fraud is right there in a nutshell. A lot of corrupt politicians pushing a shoddy air frame on the Pentagon for money.
https://maplight.org/story/john-cornyns ... ry-donors/
That's what this fraud is right there in a nutshell. A lot of corrupt politicians pushing a shoddy air frame on the Pentagon for money.
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: F35 vs. A10?
It's really not a done deal at all. They are obviously rethinking this shit show.
The Lockmart cronies lost a major battle when they failed to force the Air Force to replace F-15C with that F-35 support aircraft.
Then you can see all these fuckers receive millions of dollars collectively from this company. It's just a fraud.
The Lockmart cronies lost a major battle when they failed to force the Air Force to replace F-15C with that F-35 support aircraft.
Then you can see all these fuckers receive millions of dollars collectively from this company. It's just a fraud.
-
- Posts: 36399
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am
Re: F35 vs. A10?
Like I say, I agree with Capps, everything you post is Sky Is Falling Chicken Little Faggot fallacy.
I don't find it to be a professional military bearing.
Thus I don't find your claims of military expertise to be convincing.
I don't find it to be a professional military bearing.
Thus I don't find your claims of military expertise to be convincing.
Nec Aspera Terrent
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: F35 vs. A10?
The sky ain't falling from my perspective. It's looking much better now that the Pentagon is turning against this Clinton Foundation-like F-35 scheme.
You just are so emotionally invested in that stock that you can't accept that airframe fucking sucks for what it's actually billed for.
Also, you can't hide from the fact that your cronies lost the war to replace the F-15 with the F-35. LMFAO
You just are so emotionally invested in that stock that you can't accept that airframe fucking sucks for what it's actually billed for.
Also, you can't hide from the fact that your cronies lost the war to replace the F-15 with the F-35. LMFAO