Poll: Who Supports the Idea of a White Ethno State?

[TheReal_ND]

Wouldnt you have a better shot with Scandinavia? Dont those countries have a lower amount of nonwhites than Germany or the US?

If we are talking long term viability, The German Ethno State would be the most populous of the White Ethno States, and therefore the most viable to withstand demographic pressure from non-white immigrants to North America or Europe. The second most viable White Ethno State would be the French Ethno State. We have a mini version of that in Canada already, We call it Quebec, Vive Le Quebec Libre, her majesty defends the right.

I was going to bring those guys up. Shit politics but they are pretty racially aware.

[StCapps]

I was going to bring those guys up. Shit politics but they are pretty racially aware.

If you want to live in a White Ethno State in North America, move to Quebec. Who knew? Not StA, that's for sure, he's too busy calling me a Liberal to notice that I'm clearly a Pro-Monarchist Tory.

God Save The Queen
Vive Le Quebec Libre

[TheReal_ND]

Yeah well I'm stuck in Texas until my son is old enough to move out. Fucking sucks. Could be Florida though so hey.

[StCapps]

Yeah well I'm stuck in Texas until my son is old enough to move out. Fucking sucks. Could be Florida though so hey.

Quebec will be waiting for you when you're ready, don't believe the bullshit people on this forum say about Canada being worse on immigration than the US, it's bullshit.

We're whiter than America and one of our provinces is a White Ethno State, so enough of the SIFCLF-Bye Canada schtick,

We're the best around and nothing's gonna ever keep us down.
Gold Medal In The Face, That's whose there! Red and White, Deal With It.
Hockey is the whitest major stick and ball sport that there is, even our sports are a White Ethno State.
Y'all just jealous.
/shrugs

[TheReal_ND]

I'm probably just going to move to the country and away from this stupid city. Let them have all their "liberating" diversity.

[StCapps]

I'm probably just going to move to the country and away from this stupid city. Let them have all their "liberating" diversity.

Play some hockey, it's over 90% white guys who play, even in Texas, you'd like it. Just gotta learn to skate, grab yourself a hockey stick and you're good to go. Grab a slice of the White Ethno State at home, or there's always Quebec, if you want the whole shebang.

[Hanarchy Montanarchy]

1. Conflict though it may cause, diversity is hardly civilization ending.
2. You gain support for unpopular opinions, which maximizes individual sovereignty and helps test good ideas against bad ones, when you value diversity.

Can you give me an example of this? What a wild argument. You seem to have implied that we gain more freedom under a regime of diversity when I could quite literally plot the increase of diversity and loss of liberty on a a graph and watch the two rise in tandem.

That gets the argument backwards. You don't 'gain freedom under a regime of diversity.' Instead, diversity is the inevitable result of a regime of freedom.

[TheReal_ND]

1. Conflict though it may cause, diversity is hardly civilization ending.
2. You gain support for unpopular opinions, which maximizes individual sovereignty and helps test good ideas against bad ones, when you value diversity.

Can you give me an example of this? What a wild argument. You seem to have implied that we gain more freedom under a regime of diversity when I could quite literally plot the increase of diversity and loss of liberty on a a graph and watch the two rise in tandem.

That gets the argument backwards. You don't 'gain freedom under a regime of diversity.' Instead, diversity is the inevitable result of a regime of freedom.

Bahahaha. No offense. Your post was intelligent and I like you but that argument is retarded and you know it. Diversity was a product of cheap labor rent seeking and it has been for nearly two centuries in this nation. Fucking weird how you socialists suddenly start aligning with your "capitalist overlords," on this issue.

[SilverEagle]

Can you give me an example of this? What a wild argument. You seem to have implied that we gain more freedom under a regime of diversity when I could quite literally plot the increase of diversity and loss of liberty on a a graph and watch the two rise in tandem.

That gets the argument backwards. You don't 'gain freedom under a regime of diversity.' Instead, diversity is the inevitable result of a regime of freedom.

Bahahaha. No offense. Your post was intelligent and I like you but that argument is retarded and you know it. Diversity was a product of cheap labor rent seeking and it has been for nearly two centuries in this nation. Fucking weird how you socialists suddenly start aligning with your "capitalist overlords," on this issue.

What I don't get Nuke is if you go to a all white nation then where are you going to find black guys to gangbang creampie your wife while you video tape and jerk off in the corner? We know that you get off watching black guys cum run out of her but you really should have them wear protection...I mean it's only a matter of time before she gets a STD and/or ends up pregnant.

[Hanarchy Montanarchy]

Can you give me an example of this? What a wild argument. You seem to have implied that we gain more freedom under a regime of diversity when I could quite literally plot the increase of diversity and loss of liberty on a a graph and watch the two rise in tandem.

That gets the argument backwards. You don't 'gain freedom under a regime of diversity.' Instead, diversity is the inevitable result of a regime of freedom.

Bahahaha. No offense. Your post was intelligent and I like you but that argument is retarded and you know it. Diversity was a product of cheap labor rent seeking and it has been for nearly two centuries in this nation. Fucking weird how you socialists suddenly start aligning with your "capitalist overlords," on this issue.

We agree that there is a conflict between the needs of laborers and unrestricted movement across borders/prioritizing market freedom. But the argument isn't retarded, it is true, and you don't like the consequences. Sometimes two valid goals, like maximum liberty and protecting workers, are in conflict.

We can have a discussion about how to maximize individual liberty and prioritize the needs of workers, but if you want to argue that an ethno-state is the path to that end, you are going to have to get very specific about the contours of said state. And, if it truly does maximize individual liberty in a meaningful way, it probably won't look much like anything I would describe as an ethno-state.

The problem here is that nobody seems to really want to have a conversation about ethno-states, because they are not a very good idea. They want to have a conversation about restricting immigration, which can be a good idea, or a neutral idea, or, in some cases, a bad idea. Why you are tying the reasonable discussion about immigration policy and what (if any) role economic protectionism for American workers should play in that policy to the absurd fantasy of an ethnic utopia is beyond me.