Poll: Who Supports the Idea of a White Ethno State?

[StCapps]

I believe that by 2020 the internet will be "drama-free." That's why I always put on facebook that I don't want any drama and I don't associate with people who cause drama to let people know that I am not to be trifled with.

Internet drama is a clear indication that the sky is falling, get with the SIFCLF program.

Who coined that term? I've seen Smitty use it quite a bit, is that a term that exists outside of MHF?

Smitty came up the Pentagonese acronym SIFCLF for short, but I was the first to use the phrase "Sky Is Falling Chicken Little Faggots". I didn't realize it was that catchy of a phrase when I first used it, I was just spit balling and wanted a derogatory term to refer to that line of thinking and the people who think that way, and it couldn't have gone better really. It is an excellent phrase/acronym to show derision for such a worldview, if I do say so myself.

[Speaker to Animals]

The world is never going to be free of conflict, no one suggested otherwise.

Apparently, along with the inability to make rational arguments, you cannot read, because that's exactly what he argued. He said that the natural order of the world since the dawn of civilization was the cause of war, and if only we eliminated the ethno-state we can be free from the warfare.

Otherwise, his entire post means nothing. If we still have warfare after the ethno-state is eliminated from the face of the Earth, then what was the point?

Educationally deficient posters really are a hassle. EDPs? Hmm. Maybe need some work on that.

[Speaker to Animals]

Oh wait. LMFAO. I forgot you were the same EDP that was arguing that science was all wrong about electromagnetism. That somehow power plants can't exist because EMP weapons are impossible.

Lulz. Fucking EDPs, man.

[StCapps]

Apparently, along with the inability to make rational arguments, you cannot read, because that's exactly what he argued. He said that the natural order of the world since the dawn of civilization was the cause of war, and if only we eliminated the ethno-state we can be free from the warfare.

Pretty sure it's you who can't read. He accused you of believing the white ethno-state will be some utopia, he never said he believed in it, you just wish you were arguing against that position, because then you can pretend that you won an argument, but no one is buying it for obvious reasons.

[Speaker to Animals]

Apparently, along with the inability to make rational arguments, you cannot read, because that's exactly what he argued. He said that the natural order of the world since the dawn of civilization was the cause of war, and if only we eliminated the ethno-state we can be free from the warfare.

Pretty sure it's you who can't read.

Tell me again how EMPs can't possibly exist. That was hilarious before you tried to walk it back and then denied that you ever claimed it was not possible.

Maybe you haven't noticed, but the people who actually do possess some education were having an adult discussion before you, Monty, and GCF showed up. Notice a pattern there?

I am not trying to be mean -- well, yeah, maybe a little -- but you guys can't really cut it. That's why you feel the need to debase the forum with the strange acronyms and posting of pictures to drown out arguments you can't realistically respond to.

It's kind of sad, really.

[Speaker to Animals]

I suppose this level 2 EDP shit is a big step up from your old Alex "Aluminum!" Jones days, though.

[StCapps]

Yet more examples proving you cannot read. You have the reading comprehension problem, quit projecting on everyone else, we can read just fine, you have the issue, not us, captain college.
/shrugs

[Hanarchy Montanarchy]

The world is never going to be free of conflict, no one suggested otherwise.

Apparently, along with the inability to make rational arguments, you cannot read, because that's exactly what he argued. He said that the natural order of the world since the dawn of civilization was the cause of war, and if only we eliminated the ethno-state we can be free from the warfare.

Otherwise, his entire post means nothing. If we still have warfare after the ethno-state is eliminated from the face of the Earth, then what was the point?

Educationally deficient posters really are a hassle. EDPs? Hmm. Maybe need some work on that.

That is a very creative way of reading my arguments. But then, what else would I expect from someone who imagines the world before 1965 was a near perfect Eden of conflict free ethno-states.

[SuburbanFarmer]

[StCapps]

Cognitively deficient poster, look in the mirror for once in your life before you open your mouth to chirp others, you are just embarrassing yourself with these tirades that have zero self awareness whatsoever where you go projecting your own issues on everyone else. Or keep entertaining us by going full retard, either way.