Jeff Sessions the asshat!

User avatar
SilverEagle
Posts: 2421
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 11:07 am

Re: Jeff Sessions the asshat!

Post by SilverEagle » Wed Sep 20, 2017 12:40 pm

Speaker to Animals wrote:Weird how libertarians, just like progressives, think there should be no consequences for their behavior. Real shocker.

WTF are you talking about? I'm talking about personal liberty and you're chatting away like a conservative retard with a keyboard. What about State rights fuck face??????
There is a time for good men to do bad things.

For fuck sake, 1984 is NOT an instruction manual!

:character-bowser: __________ :character-mario: :character-luigi:

User avatar
SilverEagle
Posts: 2421
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 11:07 am

Re: Jeff Sessions the asshat!

Post by SilverEagle » Wed Sep 20, 2017 12:48 pm

Speaker to Animals wrote:Weird how libertarians, just like progressives, think there should be no consequences for their behavior. Real shocker.
Libertarians are for personal liberty and fiscally conservative. Progressives/Liberals love to enforce their will on others and spend their money. Stop listening to Rush and other conservative retards.
There is a time for good men to do bad things.

For fuck sake, 1984 is NOT an instruction manual!

:character-bowser: __________ :character-mario: :character-luigi:

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Jeff Sessions the asshat!

Post by Speaker to Animals » Wed Sep 20, 2017 1:16 pm

SilverEagle wrote:
Speaker to Animals wrote:Weird how libertarians, just like progressives, think there should be no consequences for their behavior. Real shocker.

WTF are you talking about? I'm talking about personal liberty and you're chatting away like a conservative retard with a keyboard. What about State rights fuck face??????

THEY TRIED TO ELECT HILLARY!


Speaker to Animals wrote:They tried to help Hillary win and now they want me to give a shit about their drug habit issue that, frankly, I could not give a shit about either way, actually. But now 2016 is in the rear view and I can still well remember the LP candidate actively campaigning for the Democratic party candidate and his running mate later openly admitting their object was to split the Republican vote so Hillary can win. Given that, these people want me to support their drug liberalization issue.. hmm..

Yeah, no. Go suck penis and remember this day in 2020.

User avatar
SilverEagle
Posts: 2421
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 11:07 am

Re: Jeff Sessions the asshat!

Post by SilverEagle » Wed Sep 20, 2017 1:46 pm

Speaker to Animals wrote:
SilverEagle wrote:
Speaker to Animals wrote:Weird how libertarians, just like progressives, think there should be no consequences for their behavior. Real shocker.

WTF are you talking about? I'm talking about personal liberty and you're chatting away like a conservative retard with a keyboard. What about State rights fuck face??????

THEY TRIED TO ELECT HILLARY!


Speaker to Animals wrote:They tried to help Hillary win and now they want me to give a shit about their drug habit issue that, frankly, I could not give a shit about either way, actually. But now 2016 is in the rear view and I can still well remember the LP candidate actively campaigning for the Democratic party candidate and his running mate later openly admitting their object was to split the Republican vote so Hillary can win. Given that, these people want me to support their drug liberalization issue.. hmm..

Yeah, no. Go suck penis and remember this day in 2020.
That was the "Official Party" not the real Libertarian base. Get a clue you retard.
There is a time for good men to do bad things.

For fuck sake, 1984 is NOT an instruction manual!

:character-bowser: __________ :character-mario: :character-luigi:

User avatar
SuburbanFarmer
Posts: 25287
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
Location: Ohio

Re: Jeff Sessions the asshat!

Post by SuburbanFarmer » Wed Sep 20, 2017 1:50 pm

We return to my earlier question - Does 'lolberg' refer to Libertarians, or the LP?
SJWs are a natural consequence of corporatism.

Formerly GrumpyCatFace

https://youtu.be/CYbT8-rSqo0

User avatar
Xenophon
Posts: 2713
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:41 am

Re: Jeff Sessions the asshat!

Post by Xenophon » Wed Sep 20, 2017 2:01 pm

SilverEagle wrote:
Speaker to Animals wrote:Weird how libertarians, just like progressives, think there should be no consequences for their behavior. Real shocker.
Libertarians are for personal liberty and fiscally conservative. Progressives/Liberals love to enforce their will on others and spend their money. Stop listening to Rush and other conservative retards.
Image

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Jeff Sessions the asshat!

Post by Speaker to Animals » Wed Sep 20, 2017 2:26 pm

GrumpyCatFace wrote:We return to my earlier question - Does 'lolberg' refer to Libertarians, or the LP?

For whom did you vote in the 2016 presidential general election?

User avatar
TheReal_ND
Posts: 26035
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:23 pm

Re: Jeff Sessions the asshat!

Post by TheReal_ND » Wed Sep 20, 2017 2:56 pm

SilverEagle wrote:
Speaker to Animals wrote:Weird how libertarians, just like progressives, think there should be no consequences for their behavior. Real shocker.
Libertarians are for personal liberty and fiscally conservative. Progressives/Liberals love to enforce their will on others and spend their money. Stop listening to Rush and other conservative retards.
lol they really are undercover democrats

User avatar
pineapplemike
Posts: 4650
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:34 pm

Re: Jeff Sessions the asshat!

Post by pineapplemike » Wed Sep 20, 2017 3:08 pm

What do you mean when you say libertarians? Here you lump them in with progressives, indiciating individual libertarians and not the Libertarian party
Speaker to Animals wrote:Weird how libertarians, just like progressives, think there should be no consequences for their behavior. Real shocker.
But here you're using the Libertarian party to support your claim
Speaker to Animals wrote:But now 2016 is in the rear view and I can still well remember the LP candidate actively campaigning for the Democratic party candidate and his running mate later openly admitting their object was to split the Republican vote so Hillary can win.
It's pretty well known that libertarians were not happy with the Libertarian ticket, I couldn't even support Gary Johnson in 2016, and I voted for him in 2012, so I'm not sure what you're saying here.


I also don't see why libertarians own the pot issue, aren't republicans in favor of state's rights, individual freedom and limited government? Or is it the Republican party that's against all that stuff, and not individual republicans? These labels are so confusing

User avatar
SuburbanFarmer
Posts: 25287
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
Location: Ohio

Re: Jeff Sessions the asshat!

Post by SuburbanFarmer » Wed Sep 20, 2017 3:20 pm

Speaker to Animals wrote:
GrumpyCatFace wrote:We return to my earlier question - Does 'lolberg' refer to Libertarians, or the LP?

For whom did you vote in the 2016 presidential general election?
Gary Johnson. Stein was too flaky, even as a protest vote.
SJWs are a natural consequence of corporatism.

Formerly GrumpyCatFace

https://youtu.be/CYbT8-rSqo0