DBTrek wrote:No, I used citations to illustrate the validity of my points.
And as usual, you've offered nothing but your own unsubstantiated opinions.
So . . . whatevs.
/shrug
Uh.. no. Your citation didn't in any way say what you claimed it said. It said they were more likely to live in extended families, not that most of them did so. Furthermore, even if most of them lived in extended families, they'd still live in extended families somewhere. They don't live in the woods. They tend to live in apartments.
Just linking to an article doesn't somehow win the argument when it doesn't even support your case.