I don't see it as a waste, because I think he has game left, if he's overpaid, it's not by $3.25 million, the guy just put up four 82 game 20+ goal seasons with 27 goals last season, you can't get a 27 goal scorer on the open market, for $3 million, you could get one by trade maybe, but that would be a huge cost, teams don't give young players up who can score like that, for anything short of a first round pick, the advantage of Marleau, is that they get a legitimate top six 20+ goal scoring hall of fame veteran for the next two years, without having to trade anything to get one, the third year was the price to pay to get him out of San Jose, but the third year is beyond the window, so the risk there is minimal since that year is going to be a reload with younger cheaper kids year in any case.SilverEagle wrote:no but it's still a waste of cap space. A two year $3 mill per year contract, I could understand that.Smitty-48 wrote:Meh, I'm not worried, Shanahan is not deviating, they see the two year window, they know the third year has to be a reload anyways, so they are just taking some high risk/reward bets to see what they can do before a bunch of veterans are going to be moved out in any case, but they're not going off the plan here, they didn't trade a first round pick for Marleau.
Marleau is actually a good pro role model for the kids, he's not a loud mouth who is going to come in everyday and start yelling at people, but, good, because that's not what they need, this is Matthews teams, Marleau is just here in a supporting role.
If you're going to claim that the Leafs could have signed a 27 goal scorer with Marleau pedigree for 2 years at $3 million, you're totally full of shit, and therefore just more trolling, which; Zzzzzzzz, whatevs.