Whenever you are losing an argument, your first instinct is of course to project your own faults on others. We know the drill.Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Thu Mar 07, 2019 2:00 pmNeither of you have a fucking clue what you have been prattling about for days.
F35 vs. A10?
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: F35 vs. A10?
*yip*
-
- Posts: 36399
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am
Re: F35 vs. A10?
Boeing will carry on, but St. Louis was doomed as soon as the X-35 won the fly off, and they know it, desperate stabs with various repackaging of F-15 and F/A-18 notwithstanding.
In terms of Super Duper Drone, the leader there is actually Northrup Grumman, but again, Commander Data, when he finally appears from his secret lair in Nevada, will simply be a Lockheed Martin F-35 Sensor Fusion Engine on steroids.
In terms of Super Duper Drone, the leader there is actually Northrup Grumman, but again, Commander Data, when he finally appears from his secret lair in Nevada, will simply be a Lockheed Martin F-35 Sensor Fusion Engine on steroids.
Nec Aspera Terrent
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: F35 vs. A10?
And then the StA's of the world will cry, "expensive boondoggle" when Commander Data is revealed, and he'll go around claiming that F-15X can do everything that Commander Data can for way cheaper. Puh-thetic.Smitty-48 wrote: ↑Thu Mar 07, 2019 2:06 pmBoeing will carry on, but St. Louis was doomed as soon as the X-35 won the fly off, and they know it, desperate stabs with various repackaging of F-15 and F/A-18 notwithstanding.
In terms of Super Duper Drone, the leader there is actually Northrup Grumman, but again, Commander Data, when he finally appears from his secret lair in Nevada, will simply be a Lockheed Martin F-35 Sensor Fusion Engine on steroids.
Dude watched too much BSG and thinks he's facing the cylons, so he goes full luddite.
*yip*
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: F35 vs. A10?
I have not lost this argument. I have been laughing my ass off at your ignorance. Both of your. Especially Smitty. This shit has been shared. It's fucking hilarious!StCapps wrote: ↑Thu Mar 07, 2019 2:02 pmWhenever you are losing an argument, your first instinct is of course to project your own faults on others. We know the drill.Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Thu Mar 07, 2019 2:00 pmNeither of you have a fucking clue what you have been prattling about for days.
-
- Posts: 36399
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am
Re: F35 vs. A10?
The net profit of America putting the European competitors out of business far exceeds the cost of the program, over the 50 year time frame.StCapps wrote: ↑Thu Mar 07, 2019 2:12 pmAnd then the StA's of the world will cry, "expensive boondoggle" when Commander Data is revealed, and he'll go around claiming that F-15X can do everything that Commander Data can for way cheaper. Puh-thetic.Smitty-48 wrote: ↑Thu Mar 07, 2019 2:06 pmBoeing will carry on, but St. Louis was doomed as soon as the X-35 won the fly off, and they know it, desperate stabs with various repackaging of F-15 and F/A-18 notwithstanding.
In terms of Super Duper Drone, the leader there is actually Northrup Grumman, but again, Commander Data, when he finally appears from his secret lair in Nevada, will simply be a Lockheed Martin F-35 Sensor Fusion Engine on steroids.
Dude watched too much BSG and thinks he's facing the cylons, so he goes full luddite.
Nec Aspera Terrent
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: F35 vs. A10?
Rare photograph of Smitty explaining to Capps how oobla loops are king, and the only thing you need to avoid a surface-to-air missile is a high angle of attack.
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: F35 vs. A10?
That isn't a compelling argument. We have made ours, all you do is laugh at us, repeat Winslow Wheeler talking points with no good counter-argument. That isn't winning dude, that's clearly losing.Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Thu Mar 07, 2019 2:15 pmI have been laughing my ass off at your ignorance. Both of your. Especially Smitty. This shit has been shared. It's fucking hilarious!
*yip*
-
- Posts: 36399
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am
Re: F35 vs. A10?
Iron Eagle is awesome. Charles 'Chappy' Sinclair did nothing wrong.
Iron Eagle is real. Stealth, EODAS, Sensor Fusion; F-16 on steroids does it all, no need for F-15.
Iron Eagle is real. Stealth, EODAS, Sensor Fusion; F-16 on steroids does it all, no need for F-15.
Last edited by Smitty-48 on Thu Mar 07, 2019 2:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Nec Aspera Terrent
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: F35 vs. A10?
Of course he thinks Iron Eagle was even remotely accurate. LMFAO
-
- Posts: 36399
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am
Re: F35 vs. A10?
The propaganda is accurate, Iron Eagle is real, a tactical interdiction fighter which can do it all.
In 1986, was a futuristic idea, now it is in service.
In 1986, was a futuristic idea, now it is in service.
Nec Aspera Terrent