"So now the Dems go to a simple private transaction"
-
PartyOf5
- Posts: 3656
- Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 11:15 am
Re: "So now the Dems go to a simple private transaction"
Why do I believe that image turns you on?
-
Montegriffo
- Posts: 18692
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: "So now the Dems go to a simple private transaction"
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
Montegriffo
- Posts: 18692
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: "So now the Dems go to a simple private transaction"
Meh, we have off road cars too
Last edited by Montegriffo on Tue Dec 11, 2018 2:40 pm, edited 2 times in total.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
DBTrek
- Posts: 12241
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm
Re: "So now the Dems go to a simple private transaction"
That looks like something that would be towed in a half-trailer behind this:
"Hey varmints, don't mess with a guy that's riding a buffalo"
-
PartyOf5
- Posts: 3656
- Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 11:15 am
Re: "So now the Dems go to a simple private transaction"
Nope, that's not it. Projection explains your constant references to people taking things in the behind.
-
jediuser598
- Posts: 1347
- Joined: Thu Mar 23, 2017 3:00 am
Re: "So now the Dems go to a simple private transaction"
'merica
Thy praise or dispraise is to me alike:
One doth not stroke me, nor the other strike.
-Ben Johnson
One doth not stroke me, nor the other strike.
-Ben Johnson
-
Speaker to Animals
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: "So now the Dems go to a simple private transaction"
"Hello? Ford Warranty Department? My truck isn't that old and somehow this transmission is already burned out."
-
Montegriffo
- Posts: 18692
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: "So now the Dems go to a simple private transaction"
Meh, In England, 8 good men strong and stout v 1000hp race car
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
DBTrek
- Posts: 12241
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm
Re: "So now the Dems go to a simple private transaction"
I notice in true leftist fashion, no one wins.Montegriffo wrote: ↑Tue Dec 11, 2018 12:58 pmMeh, In England, 8 good men strong and stout v 1000hp race car
Can’t have anyone outperforming anyone else.
Lulz
You guys are steeped so deeply in the kool-aid you’re shooting videos of nobody winning a reverse tug o’ war. You need to come to America now before we add wankers to the list of people who won’t gain entry.
"Hey varmints, don't mess with a guy that's riding a buffalo"
-
Montegriffo
- Posts: 18692
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: "So now the Dems go to a simple private transaction"
Only because I couldn't find the Top Gear vid of a rugby team beating a 750hp AMC Merc in a proper tug of war.DBTrek wrote: ↑Tue Dec 11, 2018 1:07 pmI notice in true leftist fashion, no one wins.Montegriffo wrote: ↑Tue Dec 11, 2018 12:58 pmMeh, In England, 8 good men strong and stout v 1000hp race car
Can’t have anyone outperforming anyone else.
Lulz
You guys are steeped so deeply in the kool-aid you’re shooting videos of nobody winning a reverse tug o’ war. You need to come to America now before we add wankers to the list of people who won’t gain entry.
In before DBTrex- probably because the video was removed because the car's starboard side had a right wing.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
