"So now the Dems go to a simple private transaction"

User avatar
jediuser598
Posts: 1347
Joined: Thu Mar 23, 2017 3:00 am

"So now the Dems go to a simple private transaction"

Post by jediuser598 » Mon Dec 10, 2018 12:16 pm

President Donald Trump on Monday dismissed payments to alleged mistresses just before the 2016 presidential election as "a simple private transaction," disputing claims by prosecutors that they amounted to a conspiracy to evade campaign finance laws.

While some congressional Democrats cast the payments as potential cause for impeachment, Trump said investigators are looking for something to pin on him because they have been unable to prove any collusion with Russians who sought to influence his presidential election.

"So now the Dems go to a simple private transaction, wrongly call it a campaign contribution," Trump said during a series of early morning tweets.

Trump's former personal attorney, Michael Cohen, is scheduled to be sentenced this week after pleading guilty to felony campaign finance violations, financial crimes and lying to Congress about Trump's business dealings in Russia.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/pol ... 262446002/

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/sta ... 7894667265

So lets get our facts here, he's pretty much admitting he had an affair, and payed hush money to quiet his mistress. Those are the facts yeah?

Hey Conservatives, how about those family values? Sanctity of marriage?
Thy praise or dispraise is to me alike:
One doth not stroke me, nor the other strike.
-Ben Johnson

User avatar
C-Mag
Posts: 28065
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm

Re: "So now the Dems go to a simple private transaction"

Post by C-Mag » Mon Dec 10, 2018 12:25 pm

Orange Man Bad

1. Family Values - Are lefties mad, because righties joined them with the Bill Clinton mantra...… Move On, it's a personal matter, concensual relationship.
2. Fuck yeah, I'd like to have higher moral standards in this country. But we don't. Nor would a 'Moral Majority' movement in this country go very far, the press would destroy them.
3. What Trump did is SOP for our government. The difference is, he used his own money. Congress pays hush money with Tax Payer funds. Want to be outraged lets start there.
4. I want one standard for everyone. Equal Justice under the law. If you are going to let Congress pay hush money, you need to STFU about Trump or Fry all of them in the same pan. I'm good with either.
5. Trump was elected with the clear understanding he's a flawed guy. He didn't get elected on the basis of having one marriage, one wife, the perfect family. He was elected to push back against a government that continually works to fuck over the average working folks.

BTW
The US is officially energy independent. We are a net exporter of energy. Every POTUS since Nixon has promised that...……………….. Trump made it happen, that's why he was elected and people don't give AF about shit like this.

Results Matter.
PLATA O PLOMO


Image


Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience

User avatar
jediuser598
Posts: 1347
Joined: Thu Mar 23, 2017 3:00 am

Re: "So now the Dems go to a simple private transaction"

Post by jediuser598 » Mon Dec 10, 2018 12:31 pm

C-Mag wrote:
Mon Dec 10, 2018 12:25 pm
Orange Man Bad

1. Family Values - Are lefties mad, because righties joined them with the Bill Clinton mantra...… Move On, it's a personal matter, concensual relationship.
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Oh shit.

The sun came out and it was a good day.
Thy praise or dispraise is to me alike:
One doth not stroke me, nor the other strike.
-Ben Johnson

User avatar
DBTrek
Posts: 12241
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm

Re: "So now the Dems go to a simple private transaction"

Post by DBTrek » Mon Dec 10, 2018 12:32 pm

Trump was still a democrat when banging and paying off porn stars shortly after his wife gave birth.
Clearly he was displaying standard progressive Democrat values.

;)
"Hey varmints, don't mess with a guy that's riding a buffalo"

User avatar
C-Mag
Posts: 28065
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm

Re: "So now the Dems go to a simple private transaction"

Post by C-Mag » Mon Dec 10, 2018 12:39 pm

oops
Last edited by C-Mag on Mon Dec 10, 2018 12:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.
PLATA O PLOMO


Image


Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience

User avatar
C-Mag
Posts: 28065
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm

Re: "So now the Dems go to a simple private transaction"

Post by C-Mag » Mon Dec 10, 2018 12:41 pm

jediuser598 wrote:
Mon Dec 10, 2018 12:31 pm
C-Mag wrote:
Mon Dec 10, 2018 12:25 pm
Orange Man Bad
The sun came out and it was a good day.
Do you believe in one standard for all in government, equal justice under the law ?
PLATA O PLOMO


Image


Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience

User avatar
jediuser598
Posts: 1347
Joined: Thu Mar 23, 2017 3:00 am

Re: "So now the Dems go to a simple private transaction"

Post by jediuser598 » Mon Dec 10, 2018 12:43 pm

C-Mag wrote:
Mon Dec 10, 2018 12:41 pm
jediuser598 wrote:
Mon Dec 10, 2018 12:31 pm
C-Mag wrote:
Mon Dec 10, 2018 12:25 pm
Orange Man Bad
The sun came out and it was a good day.
Do you believe in one standard for all in government, equal justice under the law ?
What do you mean by equal justice, just so our terms are clear.
Thy praise or dispraise is to me alike:
One doth not stroke me, nor the other strike.
-Ben Johnson

User avatar
C-Mag
Posts: 28065
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm

Re: "So now the Dems go to a simple private transaction"

Post by C-Mag » Mon Dec 10, 2018 12:56 pm

jediuser598 wrote:
Mon Dec 10, 2018 12:43 pm
C-Mag wrote:
Mon Dec 10, 2018 12:41 pm
jediuser598 wrote:
Mon Dec 10, 2018 12:31 pm


The sun came out and it was a good day.
Do you believe in one standard for all in government, equal justice under the law ?
What do you mean by equal justice, just so our terms are clear.
:doh:

OK, this is your thread. I don't want to degrade your thesis by parsing legal definitions.

You tell me what your point is for starting this thread? Do you have an argument to make ?
PLATA O PLOMO


Image


Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience

User avatar
jediuser598
Posts: 1347
Joined: Thu Mar 23, 2017 3:00 am

Re: "So now the Dems go to a simple private transaction"

Post by jediuser598 » Mon Dec 10, 2018 12:57 pm

Just to rub this in (let us be honest with each other, that's what I'm doing), here's a helpful guide to healthy polyamarous relationships:

Fidelity and loyalty: Many polyamorists define fidelity not as sexual exclusivity, but as faithfulness to the promises and agreements made about a relationship. As a relational practice, polyamory sustains a vast variety of open relationship or multi-partner constellations, which can differ in definition and grades of intensity, closeness and commitment. For some, polyamory functions as an umbrella term for the multiple approaches of 'responsible non-monogamy'. A secret sexual relationship that violates those accords would be seen as a breach of fidelity. Polyamorists generally base definitions of commitment on considerations other than sexual exclusivity, e.g. "trust and honesty" or "growing old together".

Communication and negotiation: Because there is no "standard model" for polyamorous relationships, and reliance upon common expectations may not be realistic, polyamorists often advocate explicitly negotiating with all involved to establish the terms of their relationships, and often emphasize that this should be an ongoing process of honest communication and respect. Polyamorists will usually take a pragmatic approach to their relationships; many accept that sometimes they and their partners will make mistakes and fail to live up to these ideals, and that communication is important for repairing any breaches.

Trust, honesty, dignity, and respect: Most polyamorists emphasize respect, trust, and honesty for all partners. Ideally, a partner's partners are accepted as part of that person's life rather than merely tolerated, and usually a relationship that requires deception or a "don't ask don't tell" policy is seen as a less than ideal model.

Non-possessiveness: Many polyamorists view excessive restrictions on other deep relationships as less than desirable, as such restrictions can be used to replace trust with a framework of ownership and control. It is usually preferred or encouraged that a polyamorist strive to view their partners' other significant others (often referred to as metamours or OSOs) in terms of the gain to their partners' lives rather than a threat to their own (see compersion). Therefore, jealousy and possessiveness are generally viewed not so much as something to avoid or structure the relationships around, but as responses that should be explored, understood, and resolved within each individual, with compersion as a goal.
Thy praise or dispraise is to me alike:
One doth not stroke me, nor the other strike.
-Ben Johnson

User avatar
jediuser598
Posts: 1347
Joined: Thu Mar 23, 2017 3:00 am

Re: "So now the Dems go to a simple private transaction"

Post by jediuser598 » Mon Dec 10, 2018 12:58 pm

C-Mag wrote:
Mon Dec 10, 2018 12:56 pm
jediuser598 wrote:
Mon Dec 10, 2018 12:43 pm
C-Mag wrote:
Mon Dec 10, 2018 12:41 pm


Do you believe in one standard for all in government, equal justice under the law ?
What do you mean by equal justice, just so our terms are clear.
:doh:

OK, this is your thread. I don't want to degrade your thesis by parsing legal definitions.

You tell me what your point is for starting this thread? Do you have an argument to make ?
C-mag, why are you always so respectful to me? Not sure what I've done to deserve it, lol. I mean, props on being a super civil dude, but MHF is a sea of thieves.

In other words, don't let your guard down, I'll stab you.
(rhetorically)
Thy praise or dispraise is to me alike:
One doth not stroke me, nor the other strike.
-Ben Johnson