Immigrant Invasion - Echoes of Rome

[Speaker to Animals]

RFID only works with a scanner in close proximity to the chip.

After doing a quick google search I concluded, you are right.


Well, then we need to put GPS ankle bracelets on them. Would you be against this sort of policy?

Yes. I would not like to treat human beings like livestock.

A better solution is to simply deport them back to their home countries and close immigration outside of exceptional candidates. We should approach immigration like a job interview, selecting only the best candidates who will improve our nation not destroy it, and yet the Marxists and globalists infesting both parties treat immigration like the entrance to Disney World if there were no ticket costs and the rides were free giveaways paid for by people who had no choice in the matter.

If this is a job interview frame, then we first need to determine if we need more workers. Right there, pretty much fuck no to that. So most of them are out. A business who is full up on employment will still make exceptions for exceptional engineers, scientists, etc. We should do the same.

But change begins when a plurality of Americans openly turn against the libertarians, neocons, progressives, etc. sort of in the spirit of this French uprising, but without the violence. This isn't a left-right thing. This is common sense issue based on all our self-interests. It is not in the self-interests of probably more than 90% of actual American citizens to let this farce continue, but it sure as shit is in their self-interests to deport the tens of millions of illegals along with every last naturalized citizen or visa holder living on the dole.

[Speaker to Animals]

I would also add that this uprising in France is about a tax that is only ostensibly about the global warming scam. I strongly suspect the funds are actually going to shore up shortfalls in welfare spending to the millions of immigrants they let into the country. Taxes are going up really high for everybody because this immigration policy was in the interest of only the so-called 1% of French citizens. Really the 0.1%. The others who supported the mass migrations did so against their self-interests, and I find it ironic that some of the supporters are now rioting in the streets over the crushing taxes that resulted.

[heydaralon]

RFID only works with a scanner in close proximity to the chip.

After doing a quick google search I concluded, you are right.


Well, then we need to put GPS ankle bracelets on them. Would you be against this sort of policy?

Yes. I would not like to treat human beings like livestock.

A better solution is to simply deport them back to their home countries and close immigration outside of exceptional candidates. We should approach immigration like a job interview, selecting only the best candidates who will improve our nation not destroy it, and yet the Marxists and globalists infesting both parties treat immigration like the entrance to Disney World if there were no ticket costs and the rides were free giveaways paid for by people who had no choice in the matter.

If this is a job interview frame, then we first need to determine if we need more workers. Right there, pretty much fuck no to that. So most of them are out. A business who is full up on employment will still make exceptions for exceptional engineers, scientists, etc. We should do the same.

But change begins when a plurality of Americans openly turn against the libertarians, neocons, progressives, etc. sort of in the spirit of this French uprising, but without the violence. This isn't a left-right thing. This is common sense issue based on all our self-interests. It is not in the self-interests of probably more than 90% of actual American citizens to let this farce continue, but it sure as shit is in their self-interests to deport the tens of millions of illegals along with every last naturalized citizen or visa holder living on the dole.

I agree with that point and the gps idea probably was a bad one, but the problem is that leftists often argue against border security by saying stuff like: "Most illegals flew here on a plane and simply over stayed their VISA. We can't keep track of them." My response is, lets figure out a way to keep track of them and get them out quickly before they drop an anchor baby.

I think we should definitely only take highly educated, fluent fucking English speakers, with no criminal records, and preferably small families.

The big problem is that liberals never specify who they wouldn't take. I've never seen a proposed group, from Muslim rapist to Caravan Rapists, to Somalian pirates who rape on the high seas, get turned down. There is always a fucking reason why we need to let in the entire third world. I really hope that Trump starts a positive anti immigration trend in American politics. I wish this was one of the core GOP policies, as much as pro life, and second Amendment rights are.

The statue of liberty propaganda bullshit is ruining our labor force and taxpayers. What kind of Marxist moron would want the shitty people from all over the world? We should get the cream of the crop, not the bottom of the barrel.

[Speaker to Animals]

Well, groups they won't take are demographics that prove unreliable democrat party voters, like Cubans. In the aftermath of the election, in the final days of the Obama administration, they lashed back at Cuban Americans by ending the asylum policy for people escaping communist Cuba.

They likely would not want Venezuelans fleeing the result of socialism either.

We already know they don't want white South Africans fleeing a genocide.

They didn't want anything to do with the Christians in the Levant fleeing a genocide, preferring instead to import millions of the Muslim genociders.



All of which violates the self-interests of left Americans themselves. Just because a policy might make the democratic party stronger in elections does not mean it is good for the democratic party electorate. The trick is to bring that disconnect to a head in all areas. One simple solution is an effective outreach to the black community to turn them against the democratic party's open border stance. This radically decimates the black community. Blacks and hispanics are two demographics with opposing self-interests.

[heydaralon]

Well, groups they won't take are demographics that prove unreliable democrat party voters, like Cubans. In the aftermath of the election, in the final days of the Obama administration, they lashed back at Cuban Americans by ending the asylum policy for people escaping communist Cuba.

They likely would not want Venezuelans fleeing the result of socialism either.

We already know they don't want white South Africans fleeing a genocide.

They didn't want anything to do with the Christians in the Levant fleeing a genocide, preferring instead to import millions of the Muslim genociders.



All of which violates the self-interests of left Americans themselves. Just because a policy might make the democratic party stronger in elections does not mean it is good for the democratic party electorate. The trick is to bring that disconnect to a head in all areas.

To be honest, I don't want Venezuelans here. I think Smitty said that those White Farmers are all pozzed leftists anyway.

[heydaralon]

I know a few Cubans who are pretty cool, but I'm glad they ended the Asylum policy though. It should never have been in place.

If what you are saying is true about the Obama administration punishing them for voting red, then here is what the Republicans should do:

1. Promise all the gibs to every Mexican and Central American who votes Republican.
2. Get them to vote Republican.
3. Democrats retaliate by closing off the border.
4. Get Dems and Republicans to support a bipartisan deportation bill which will remove all illegal Mexicans who are now evil racist Republicans who are enemies of the left.
5. Rapes plummet.
6. Win/win

[heydaralon]

I would also add that this uprising in France is about a tax that is only ostensibly about the global warming scam. I strongly suspect the funds are actually going to shore up shortfalls in welfare spending to the millions of immigrants they let into the country. Taxes are going up really high for everybody because this immigration policy was in the interest of only the so-called 1% of French citizens. Really the 0.1%. The others who supported the mass migrations did so against their self-interests, and I find it ironic that some of the supporters are now rioting in the streets over the crushing taxes that resulted.

Yeah its gross man. I hate France, but I feel bad that the average French citizen has to worry about getting blown up walking to the grocery store to get a bagette and gets higher taxes to boot. Stupid Euro people never learn, they bring this upon themselves by falling for this shit every time.

[DBTrek]

If it wasn't for immigrants America would be a desolate moon rock.

Or so I'm told.

[Speaker to Animals]

Not really. They have to equate our colonial forebears with "immigrants" when conquest was a better descriptor.

Mass migration all but demographically murdered the original Puritan stock that adopted it essentially to politically and then violently defeat Virginians. That was no success story at all other than for the modern descendants of those Irish immigrants to thank Jesus the Anglo Puritans were stupid enough to win wars via mass migration so they were born American rather than Irish.

[DBTrek]

We're all immigrants from the African diaspora some few hundred thousand years ago, m8.
Ergo, we should live in a borderless world.

Do you even NPR?