Seattle Socialists Strangle Golden Goose

[C-Mag]

Seattle council homeless solution - pay to bus the homeless out of state
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/0 ... -the-city/

It looks like homelessness is getting intolerable for Seattle. I'm sure this will fail.....too late in the game already. But I like the solution, you're kind's not welcome here. Its the way it used to be done. My wifes grandfather was the chief of police in a timber mill town in the late 40's and early 50's. The bums, drunks and addicts got two choices. Hop on the train and get out of town, or get tossed on the train with a knot on your head.

[Montegriffo]

They road blocked the road out of the area my condos are located in. Created traffic just to "check licenses". Total road piracy.

Tell that to HeyDaralon. He's been wrecked twice by drivers with no insurance or licences.
What if it was roadblocks checking immigration status? Would that still be piracy?

[Speaker to Animals]

They road blocked the road out of the area my condos are located in. Created traffic just to "check licenses". Total road piracy.

Tell that to HeyDaralon. He's been wrecked twice by drivers with no insurance or licences.
What if it was roadblocks checking immigration status? Would that still be piracy?

Yes.


The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

[Montegriffo]

They road blocked the road out of the area my condos are located in. Created traffic just to "check licenses". Total road piracy.

Tell that to HeyDaralon. He's been wrecked twice by drivers with no insurance or licences.
What if it was roadblocks checking immigration status? Would that still be piracy?

Yes.


The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

Seems like a stretch to quote that. What is unreasonable about trying to catch people driving illegally?
Do you oppose ICE agents raiding restaurants in order to find undocumented immigrants?

[Speaker to Animals]

Tell that to HeyDaralon. He's been wrecked twice by drivers with no insurance or licences.
What if it was roadblocks checking immigration status? Would that still be piracy?

Yes.


The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

Seems like a stretch to quote that. What is unreasonable about trying to catch people driving illegally?
Do you oppose ICE agents raiding restaurants in order to find undocumented immigrants?

It is unconstitutional to detain and search people without probable cause that a crime has been committed.

[Montegriffo]

Yes.


The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

Seems like a stretch to quote that. What is unreasonable about trying to catch people driving illegally?
Do you oppose ICE agents raiding restaurants in order to find undocumented immigrants?

It is unconstitutional to detain and search people without probable cause that a crime has been committed.

Isn't that really tying the police's hands behind their backs in this case?
How else do you catch people driving without licences or insurance? Wait until they kill someone or destroy their car without the ability to replace it?

[Speaker to Animals]

Seems like a stretch to quote that. What is unreasonable about trying to catch people driving illegally?
Do you oppose ICE agents raiding restaurants in order to find undocumented immigrants?

It is unconstitutional to detain and search people without probable cause that a crime has been committed.

Isn't that really tying the police's hands behind their backs in this case?
How else do you catch people driving without licences or insurance? Wait until they kill someone or destroy their car without the ability to replace it?

No. Police do not need to stop and harass every driver on the road to catch drunk drivers. It's lazy and an exercise in an abuse of power.

Nor were these cops looking for drunk drivers. They were looking for common vehicle violations like expired tags and inoperable lights. It was a revenue collection scheme, and it's not even legal.

[Montegriffo]

It is unconstitutional to detain and search people without probable cause that a crime has been committed.

Isn't that really tying the police's hands behind their backs in this case?
How else do you catch people driving without licences or insurance? Wait until they kill someone or destroy their car without the ability to replace it?

No. Police do not need to stop and harass every driver on the road to catch drunk drivers. It's lazy and an exercise in an abuse of power.

Nor were these cops looking for drunk drivers. They were looking for common vehicle violations like expired tags and inoperable lights. It was a revenue collection scheme, and it's not even legal.

You said they were checking licences. What are they supposed to do if they catch people violating vehicle regulations?

[TheReal_ND]

Isn't that really tying the police's hands behind their backs in this case?
How else do you catch people driving without licences or insurance? Wait until they kill someone or destroy their car without the ability to replace it?

No. Police do not need to stop and harass every driver on the road to catch drunk drivers. It's lazy and an exercise in an abuse of power.

Nor were these cops looking for drunk drivers. They were looking for common vehicle violations like expired tags and inoperable lights. It was a revenue collection scheme, and it's not even legal.

You said they were checking licences. What are they supposed to do if they catch people violating vehicle regulations?

Depends on the state. Verification for your vehicle differs according to what state police pulled you over. In Texas they don't ask for registration but all state troopers do. So they will always take insurance which is federally required to have a vehicle registration. But then they can pull up your name in their system that for some reason communicates with a state a thousand miles away and a couple others and pull up warrants on you depending if you even have ID. Depending if they read it right to the sassy black lady at dispatch.

[C-Mag]

Seattle mayor and city coucil wont talk about crime pandemic in Seattle

https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/seattle ... ason-rantz