-
DBTrek
- Posts: 12241
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm
Post
by DBTrek » Tue Mar 06, 2018 4:05 pm
Park anywhere: A truck is legally a home in Seattle
Just when you thought our homelessness problem couldn’t get any more bizarre, let me lay this one on you.
King County Superior Court Judge Catherine Shaffer just ruled that a truck is a home. You heard me right. A homeless man named Steven Long had his truck impounded because it violated the 72-hour parking law.
You remember laws, right? Those written rules that supposedly apply to everyone? Yeah, me neither. Well Mr. Long decided to sue the city and won.
According to the reporting in The Seattle Times, Assistant City Attorney Michael Ryan is flabbergasted. He told the Times:
- Someone could park right here in front of the court house on Fifth Avenue, and we couldn’t tow them, or if we did tow them, we couldn’t put them in impound. We’d have to put them somewhere else and we couldn’t charge them at all for it, because if we did, we’d violate the constitution if they were living in that vehicle.
If you thought the homeless population was brazen before, now all they have to do is park wherever they want and just invoke this ruling.
“This is my home. I don’t have to move it, you can’t impound it. I live here now.”
So a homeless person in any vehicle they choose can now drive up to a spectacular multi-million dollar waterfront view and boom, it’s now their home...
http://mynorthwest.com/917295/truck-hom ... picks=true
Ah, Seattle. You never let your crazy well run dry. Always priming that pump with another shot of WTF, to keep things interesting.
Well ... the joke is on the homeless. If they think having their vehicle declared a home is a victory, they have no idea what King county does to home owners when tax time comes around.
Going to be a lot of rusty wagons going into foreclosure ...
-
Speaker to Animals
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Post
by Speaker to Animals » Tue Mar 06, 2018 4:26 pm
Maybe we should make judges the arbiters of all social and moral disputes. What could possibly go wrong?
-
Fife
- Posts: 15157
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:47 am
Post
by Fife » Tue Mar 06, 2018 4:33 pm
Speaker to Animals wrote:Maybe we should make judges the arbiters of all social and moral disputes. What could possibly go wrong?
There's lots of ways to skin a cat. Everyone in this thread is, IMNSHO, a good candidate to enjoy this take on historical dispute resolution (hint hint DB and StA, but the door is open for all of you).
WTF?!: An Economic Tour of the Weird
Step right up! Get your tickets for WTF?! An Economic Tour of the Weird! This rollicking tour through a museum of the world's weirdest practices is guaranteed to make you say, "WTF?!" Did you know that "preowned" wives were sold at auction in nineteenth-century England? That today, in Liberia, accused criminals sometimes drink poison to determine their fate? How about the fact that, for 250 years, Italy criminally prosecuted cockroaches and crickets? Do you wonder why? Then this tour is just for you!
Join WTF?!'s cast of colorful characters as they navigate the museum, led by guide and economist Peter T. Leeson. From one exhibit to the next, you'll overhear Leeson's riotous exchanges with the patrons and learn how to use economic thinking to reveal the hidden sense behind seemingly senseless human behavior—including your own. Leeson shows that far from "irrational" or "accidents of history," humanity's most outlandish rituals are ingenious solutions to pressing problems—developed by clever people, driven by incentives, and tailor-made for their time and place. Can you handle getting schooled by the strange? Better hurry, the tour is about to start!
-
DBTrek
- Posts: 12241
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm
Post
by DBTrek » Tue Mar 06, 2018 4:52 pm
If Monte or Nuke ever need a city to call “home”, Seattle is here for you.
Well, we’re a sanctuary city too, so I guess it’s fair to say we’re here for everyone.
We’re the bus station of America, just throw your shit down somewhere and make yourself at home for a while.
-
Okeefenokee
- Posts: 12950
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:27 pm
- Location: The Great Place
Post
by Okeefenokee » Tue Mar 06, 2018 10:00 pm
I assume we're charging property taxes on all car owners now, right?
I mean, if a car is home, then everyone who owns a scooter is now on the hook for the next school tax hike, right?
Or are we making an exception on that front?
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Dumb slut partied too hard and woke up in a weird house. Ran out the door, weeping for her failed life choices, concerned townsfolk notes her appearance and alerted the fuzz.
viewtopic.php?p=60751#p60751
-
Speaker to Animals
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Post
by Speaker to Animals » Tue Mar 06, 2018 10:41 pm
Okeefenokee wrote:I assume we're charging property taxes on all car owners now, right?
I mean, if a car is home, then everyone who owns a scooter is now on the hook for the next school tax hike, right?
Or are we making an exception on that front?
I am getting slammed with property taxes on my Jeep. It pisses me the fuck off every October now.
-
Haumana
- Posts: 4149
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:48 am
Post
by Haumana » Tue Mar 06, 2018 11:56 pm
Okeefenokee wrote:I assume we're charging property taxes on all car owners now, right?
I mean, if a car is home, then everyone who owns a scooter is now on the hook for the next school tax hike, right?
Or are we making an exception on that front?
That was my takeway too! Or is it that the City is now their landlord since the "own" they property under the residence in question?
-
BjornP
- Posts: 3360
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 9:36 am
- Location: Aalborg, Denmark
Post
by BjornP » Wed Mar 07, 2018 12:09 am
Does that mean that Seattle cab drivers can charge "rent" from their customers after they leave the cab?
Might be a "great" way to bring those homeless numbers down, tho: Do nothing except change the statistics parameter for what counts as homeless.
Fame is not flattery. Respect is not agreement.
-
Haumana
- Posts: 4149
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:48 am
Post
by Haumana » Wed Mar 07, 2018 12:14 am
BjornP wrote:Does that mean that Seattle cab drivers can charge "rent" from their customers after they leave the cab?
Might be a "great" way to bring those homeless numbers down, tho: Do nothing except change the statistics parameter for what counts as homeless.
Or can the customer refuse to vacate said dwelling and claim residency that requires a sheriffs intervention?
-
BjornP
- Posts: 3360
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 9:36 am
- Location: Aalborg, Denmark
Post
by BjornP » Wed Mar 07, 2018 12:29 am
Haumana wrote:BjornP wrote:Does that mean that Seattle cab drivers can charge "rent" from their customers after they leave the cab?
Might be a "great" way to bring those homeless numbers down, tho: Do nothing except change the statistics parameter for what counts as homeless.
Or can the customer refuse to vacate said dwelling and claim residency that requires a sheriffs intervention?
Squataxists?
The YouTube Uber vids will be legendary.
Fame is not flattery. Respect is not agreement.