If You Are Going To Censor Folks, Make A Rule Against It First. No Selective Enforcement.
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
If You Are Going To Censor Folks, Make A Rule Against It First. No Selective Enforcement.
If you make a rule, I'll abide by it, but censoring me when no such rules have been established, that's stupid.
*yip*
-
- Posts: 26035
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:23 pm
Re: If You Are Going To Censor Folks, Make A Rule Against It First. No Selective Enforcement.
Lol fucking spergs. Jesus
-
- Posts: 18728
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm
Re: If You Are Going To Censor Folks, Make A Rule Against It First. No Selective Enforcement.
What about the things we want more of, like Naked Yoga videos? Shouldn’t the rules include “More naked yoga”?
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change
-
- Posts: 12241
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm
Re: If You Are Going To Censor Folks, Make A Rule Against It First. No Selective Enforcement.
“If You Are Going To Censor Folks, Make A Rule Against It First.”
I’m confused.
If we make a rule against it, then censor folks, haven’t we broken the rule?
The fuck kind of puzzling wizardry is going on here?
I’m confused.
If we make a rule against it, then censor folks, haven’t we broken the rule?
The fuck kind of puzzling wizardry is going on here?
"Hey varmints, don't mess with a guy that's riding a buffalo"
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: If You Are Going To Censor Folks, Make A Rule Against It First. No Selective Enforcement.
So you are just going to be an ass and not take this seriously, and censor people without warning, for infractions they were completely unaware were infractions, without adequate explanation on top of it?Martin Hash wrote:What about the things we want more of, like Naked Yoga videos? Shouldn’t the rules include “More naked yoga”?
Just make a rule, or knock off the censorship, is that so hard?
Last edited by StCapps on Wed Feb 14, 2018 3:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.
*yip*
-
- Posts: 15157
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:47 am
Re: If You Are Going To Censor Folks, Make A Rule Against It First. No Selective Enforcement.
Wait a minute, duke. I thought this was still America.
-
- Posts: 12241
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm
Re: If You Are Going To Censor Folks, Make A Rule Against It First. No Selective Enforcement.
Isn’t all enforcement selective?
"Hey varmints, don't mess with a guy that's riding a buffalo"
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: If You Are Going To Censor Folks, Make A Rule Against It First. No Selective Enforcement.
The semantics bandwagon is growing at quite the pace.
*yip*
-
- Posts: 15157
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:47 am
Re: If You Are Going To Censor Folks, Make A Rule Against It First. No Selective Enforcement.
Indeed, Grasshopper.DBTrek wrote:Isn’t all enforcement selective?
All the more reason to kill the enforcers.
There's nothing here that we can't work out among ourselves.
:goteam: :drunk:
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: If You Are Going To Censor Folks, Make A Rule Against It First. No Selective Enforcement.
You are deusional, there was clear warning not to fuck with Martin's area.StCapps wrote: censor people without warning, for infractions they were completely unaware were infractions, without adequate explanation on top of it?
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.