Might as well if fossil fuel lackeys are being put in charge.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
The US embassy in Benghazi was raided on the 11th anniversary of the 9/11 ... this was some kind of spontaneous demonstration
~ James Clapper September 2012
I guess that's the kind of guy they trust, one that won't politicize the office
toss wray, haspel, pompeo and bolton for starters. who else is in there that needs to go?
+10
That's a great start. Real reform would be tearing apart the Senior Executive Service. That is the seed bed of all these life long bureaucrats.
Here's what anti trumpers are saying about Ratcliffe
Why not just remove the entire top tiers of the FBI/CIA and have them attempt for their jobs again, if they were not found part of the coop they can get their jobs back with a caveat that they are on probation until the investigation is done.
Might as well if fossil fuel lackeys are being put in charge.
No shit, Sherlock.
It's the "put in charge" part that seems to be clogging your manifold.
Surely, putting someone in charge who gives a flying fuck about the environment is a better solution than shutting the agency down.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Nassim Taleb has a decent argument that the very idea of centralized intelligence is flawed in a similar way that directed research is usually pointless in terms of whatever goal according to which it is directed.
Probably needs to be more distributed and exploratory. No end goal per se. Just gather intelligence and try to make sense of it different windows.
Have somebody else try to package that into directed intelligence in a similar fashion to how meta analysis is where scientific research really shines.
