An independent “governance review” conducted by a prominent law firm that specializes in philanthropic issues concluded in December 2010 that the Clinton Foundation had a weak, rubber stamp board of directors and that many of its donors had “an expectation of a quid pro quo benefits in return for gifts.”
The blistering review — made public Thursday by WikiLeaks — described a tax-exempt public foundation with none of the independent oversight required under federal charity law. The Clinton Foundation reported $187 million in net assets in 2011.
http://dailycaller.com/2016/10/14/bombs ... for-gifts/
Never mind, what happened in Niger???
Clinton Foundation Donors Expected ‘Benefits In Return For Gifts’
-
kybkh
- Posts: 2826
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 8:33 am
Clinton Foundation Donors Expected ‘Benefits In Return For Gifts’
“I've got a phone that allows me to convene Americans from every walk of life, nonprofits, businesses, the private sector, universities to try to bring more and more Americans together around what I think is a unifying theme..." - Obama
-
C-Mag
- Posts: 28305
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm
Re: Clinton Foundation Donors Expected ‘Benefits In Return For Gifts’
Comey, Rosenstein, Mueller, $37 Million dollars and the Clinton Bush Haiti Fund
https://truepundit.com/did-mueller-come ... ke-relief/
https://truepundit.com/did-mueller-come ... ke-relief/
PLATA O PLOMO
Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience
Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience
