CANADA YES!

[TheReal_ND]

Dyke Premier Wynne has just passed Bill 89, which allows for Children's Aid to seize your kids (biological/adopted/step children) if you hold anti-LGBTQ/binary gender/anti-gay marriage views and place them in LGBTQ gay-couple homes (friendly reminder that 40%+ of gays are pedophiles). Muslims/Sikhs are exempt because the bill is worded to consider the child's "creed".

“Even before Bill 89 was passed, but immediately after its introduction in December, I learned of several Christian couples who were turned down for adoption on account of their deeply held religious beliefs about traditional marriage and human sexuality,” he told LifeSiteNews.

TORONTO, June 1, 2017 (LifeSiteNews) — Ontario’s Kathleen Wynne Liberals have passed what critics describe as “totalitarian” Bill 89 on the last day before Queen’s Park adjourns for the summer.

Pro-family advocates warn Bill 89 gives the state more power to seize children from families that oppose the LGBTQI and gender ideology agenda, and allows government agencies to effectively ban couples who disagree with that agenda from fostering or adopting children.

Children’s Aid agencies now have “a type of police power to bust down your door, and seize your biological children if you are known to oppose LGBT ideology and the fraudulent theory of ‘gender identity', if for instance, some claim is made that your child may be same-sex attracted or confused about their ‘gender,’” according to Fonseca.

"We already see similar tyranny happening in other jurisdictions, such as Norway, where the main child protection service there, Barnevernet, has been involved in numerous high profile seizures of children from traditionally-principled families,” he added.

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/break ... ids-from-c


http://www.ontla.on.ca/web/bills/bills_ ... l_the_bill



Use ctrl+f and enter the terms "creed, sex, gender identity, or gender expression." The article is a bit misleading as LGBQT is not included in the bill.





Ontario Child School Curriculum was written by a convicted pedophile (deputy Education Minister under Wynne when she was Education Minister). She has since put the curriculum into schools which teaches pro-LGBTQ, pro-gender identity, pro-gay marriage views. It also teaches disgusting sexual practices to kids such as anal group fisting.




http://www.realwomenofcanada.ca/bill-28/

this proposed legislation permits the CAS to withdraw a child from its family if it is determined the child is likely to suffer emotional or mental harm, or for a parent’s failure to provide the child with services or treatment. If a child decides he/she is of a gender other than his/her biological gender, the parents are required by this legislation to provide transgender medical services to the child or risk the child being removed from the home.

74 (2)
(e) the child requires treatment to cure, prevent or alleviate physical harm or suffering and the child’s parent or the person having charge of the child does not provide the treatment or access to the treatment, or, where the child is incapable of consenting to the treatment under the Health Care Consent Act, 1996 and the parent is a substitute decision-maker for the child, the parent refuses or is unavailable or unable to consent to the treatment on the child’s behalf;

Translation: your son wants to cut off his dick but you refuse to let him, the court will take him away from you for child abuse to alleviate his "suffering"

Also fwiw,

[Smitty-48]

Meh, hopefully the rabble rousing will max the SoCon vote out against the Liberals, but I wouldn't take the bait if I were the Tories, because the only thing left in the Liberal quiver now is to try to protray them as "Extremists!" read "Religious!", they already oppose the bill, but I wouldn't go overboard, because that's just playing into the Liberals trap. /shrugs

If you're not ready to vote the Liberals out at this point, you're a libtard, and this rabble rousing isn't going to make the difference, for everybody else; preaching to the choir.

[TheReal_ND]

More of a cautionary tale for Americans. I heard Norway has similar legislation already. I'm of the opinion this SJW nonsense will continue to get worse before it gets better.

[Smitty-48]

Well it's helpful for the Tory agenda here, the Liberals are getting desperate, they're doubling down on their hardcore base, but the way it works here, is that it is Toronto vs. the Rest of the Province, the Rest of the Province is already a Tory stronghold, and they already have the SoCon vote, the name of the game is taking seats off the Liberals in Toronto, and so you don't want to go overboard with the SoCon rabble rousing, because that just plays into the Liberals hands.

The name of the game is to win, if they win, the Tories will repeal this act, make no mistake. Patrick Brown is a SoCon, so if the Tories win, the SoCons have their Premier, but we've got to play smart here, have to watch the flanks and not get baited into a trap.

Patrick Brown is not a Donald Trump, he's more like Mike Pence, so, have to be careful, about giving the Liberals ammo to use against him, if the SoCons want to win, they have to get with the program. We have to go into Toronto and pull votes on bread and butter, if we go in banging the SoCon drum, that's just handing it back to the Liberals, we don't want to pull a Bernie Bro here, get too precious about shit, and blow ourselves up.

Run on bread and butter, win on bread and butter, after you win, you can repeal things at your leisure. SoCons will get their due, but they need to keep their powder dry here, stand-by, stand-by, let's get through the breach first.

[clubgop]

And notice how GCF falls silent on the issue. They have similar laws about Sharia. And his defense will be "its not USA." Then when it seeps into California because you know it will, he'll then say "it's not Ohio." Those values they talk about are surrender nothing more.

[Smitty-48]

They have similar laws about Sharia.

Hunh? What law are you referring to? The Liberals aren't pro-Sharia, they banned its use in the courts, and this law here, would seem to be aimed right at it as well.

Ironically, the Sharia types are all onside with Nukedog & the SoCons, they invoke the same religious persecution complex. You can either go after the religious or not, but if you go after one you have to go after them all, if Sharia doesn't get a pass, then neither does Jesusland.

When it comes to the CAS and parents invoking "it's my religion" as a shield for laying the beatdown on their kids or whatever, it's the Mooslambs playing that card more than anybody, if we're going to put a stop to that, Jesusland will get swept up in the dragnet, inevitably.

Can't pick the pepper from the fly shit, it's all the same God, either he's a shield or he's not, can't have it both ways. Jesusland Yes, Sharialand No, the constitution won't abide that paradox.

If we put the clause back into act that the Jesuslanders are demanding here, Sharia will be able to invoke that clause as well.

The thin edge of the wedge which is now being turned on the Jesuslanders, all started when Ontario went reactionary against Sharia and the Liberals said “There will be no sharia law in Ontario. There will be no religious arbitration in Ontario. There will be one law for all Ontarians.”

This is the very sword, which is now being turned against the Jesusjuicers. "No religious arbitration" means what it says, if you yank it from Moohammed, Jesus gets his yanked out from under him too.

Sharialand don't want their kids to be homos, Jesusland don't want their kids to be homos, but the law says too bad so sad, Jesaria law will not stand.

[Smitty-48]

In the end, it's not Canada which introduced this to the USA, it's the opposite, the USA introduced this to Canada, before we had the 1982 Constitution, we could have paradoxes, the Crown could pick one over the other, Jesusland yes, Sharialand no, by royal decree, but since we went to the American style bill of rights model, that can no longer stand.

Your kids don't have consitutional rights in the USA? Oh yes they do. Your parental authority supercedes those rights? Oh no it don't. No right is unlimited, but you can't order your kids not to be gay, and if your kids decided to get a lawyer, the state would intervene on their behalf. Royalist Canada didn't invent the ACLU, that sort of thing migtrated here, from where again? Oh yeah, that's right, from America.

This law here; same-same, it's an Americanized law. If the Tories repeal this law, that would in essence be a move back towards "royal decree", which, as a Tory, I'm not particularly opposed to, but that would be fundamentally Un-American, which, as a Tory, I wouldn't be particularly opposed to neither, I mean, obviously.

Nukedog & Co. simply want an Isreal of their very own, which, I understand, but, in order to have that, you need a de facto monarchy, in the land of Isreal, David is King, if you want an American Isreal, with Jesus as King, the republic cannot stand.

[TheReal_ND]

Not at all. You can't drink, you can't smoke and you can't join the army until your 18(17) why should you be able to cut your dick off when you're twelve? Why should a parent give up their right to be parents in order for the state to raise the child? This has nothing to do with Jesus at all.

[Smitty-48]

Not at all. You can't drink, you can't smoke and you can't join the army until your 18(17) why should you be able to cut your dick off when you're twelve? Why should a parent give up their right to be parents in order for the state to raise the child? This has nothing to do with Jesus at all.

Well, luckily there's no such law. Alls well that ends well then. /shrugs

[TheReal_ND]

No however it's been proposed. As of right now you can only have your kid taken by the state for being homophobic or not letting your kid cross dress apparently.