Fife wrote:Does everybody understand the word "gender?"
Why We Should Stop Using the Term ‘Gender’
To state my thesis plainly: gender is a grammatical concept that has been co-opted as a means of confusing the uneducated about the biological facts of sexual dimorphism for distinctly ideological purposes. The strategy has widely worked. All those committed to scientific truth and biological reality should stop using the term in that way. Continuing to do so is playing into the hands of openly anti-science social constructionists. To claim there are only two genders is a confused response. It grants their core premise while ostensibly disputing their arguments.
Maybe we should.
Wikipedoia entry for gender wrote:Sexologist John Money introduced the terminological distinction between biological sex and gender as a role in 1955. Before his work, it was uncommon to use the word gender to refer to anything but grammatical categories.[1][2] However, Money's meaning of the word did not become widespread until the 1970s, when feminist theory embraced the concept of a distinction between biological sex and the social construct of gender.
If gender goes away, then there are only sexes.....
Science says there are only two sexes - X and Y, only a single chromosome controls gender, and the human genome only has two alleles per chromosome. So, if gender ceases to be a concept, then there are only males and females.
The "third gender" is a genetic mutation of XYY and other variants that are mixtures of the two sexes XX and XY - not a new sex. But Hermaphrodite are, for the most part, not the ones pontificating the "gender-neutral" society mantra / quackery. The concept of "gender" has to exist in order for the SJWs to define a "gender-less" society.
