Aircraft Carriers Obsolete

User avatar
Martin Hash
Posts: 18314
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm

Re: Aircraft Carriers Obsolete

Post by Martin Hash » Tue Apr 25, 2017 10:24 am

As long as ships are built in the U.S. using U.S. made parts, aircraft carriers & the like are excellent jobs programs.
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change

Smitty-48
Posts: 36399
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am

Re: Aircraft Carriers Obsolete

Post by Smitty-48 » Tue Apr 25, 2017 10:27 am

You can apply the Lolberg "wasteful!" bugaboo to almost anything the Pentagon does, America itself is a big waste of time and money, but that's the whole point of America, it's a mechanism, for spreading the pork around, better to spend it on aircraft carriers than to just hand that money over to the Negroes, nobody wants that.

The whole point of the MIC is to ensure that the lion share of the pork gets routed back to the white people, if you started spending the money on social programs and whatnot, most of it would be going to brown people, and that, would be Un-American, that, is "Communism".
Nec Aspera Terrent

User avatar
Martin Hash
Posts: 18314
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm

Re: Aircraft Carriers Obsolete

Post by Martin Hash » Tue Apr 25, 2017 10:37 am

Smitty-48 wrote:You can apply the Lolberg "wasteful!" bugaboo to almost anything the Pentagon does, America itself is a big waste of time and money, but that's the whole point of America, it's a mechanism, for spreading the pork around, better to spend it on aircraft carriers than to just hand that money over to the Negroes, nobody wants that.

The whole point of the MIC is to ensure that the lion share of the pork gets routed back to the white people, if you started spending the money on social programs and whatnot, most of it would be going to brown people, and that, would be Un-American, that, is "Communism".
"Sarcasm works best when the truth is not far off." - me

In reality, it's better to "redistribute" money to the Top Quarter of the population than to Losers. The MIC does that with a healthy dose being skimmed off by The 1%.
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change

Smitty-48
Posts: 36399
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am

Re: Aircraft Carriers Obsolete

Post by Smitty-48 » Tue Apr 25, 2017 10:44 am

Yeah, the rich get their share, and the middle class gets their share too, but the beauty of the MIC, is that it keeps the money out of the ghetto, the MIC doesn't spend any money in the ghetto, who knew?

Lolbergs should appreciate the aircraft carrier, gives you an excuse, to the keep the money out of the hands of Planned Parenthood & Co.
Nec Aspera Terrent

User avatar
DBTrek
Posts: 12241
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm

Re: Aircraft Carriers Obsolete

Post by DBTrek » Tue Apr 25, 2017 10:49 am

"Hey varmints, don't mess with a guy that's riding a buffalo"

User avatar
Alexander PhiAlipson
Posts: 1411
Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2017 2:29 pm

Re: Aircraft Carriers Obsolete

Post by Alexander PhiAlipson » Tue Apr 25, 2017 1:55 pm

DBTrek wrote:Timely.
MSN wrote:First, their speed allows them to outrun many other ships, particularly submarines.

They have "hundreds of watertight compartments and thousands of tons of armor, no conventional torpedo or mine is likely to cause serious damage."

The carriers also have high-tech sensors that can pick up missiles at great distances. To counter missiles they have "radar-guided missiles and 20 mm Gatling guns that shoot 50 rounds per second."
Nothing in this article addresses the issue of a fishing boat towing a nuclear mine. :shock:
"She had yellow hair and she walked funny and she made a noise like... O my God, please don't kill me! "

User avatar
DBTrek
Posts: 12241
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm

Re: Aircraft Carriers Obsolete

Post by DBTrek » Tue Apr 25, 2017 1:59 pm

No word on anti-Godzilla countermeasures either. Nuke trawlers and lightning breathing dinosaurs, the downfall of carriers.
"Hey varmints, don't mess with a guy that's riding a buffalo"

Smitty-48
Posts: 36399
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am

Re: Aircraft Carriers Obsolete

Post by Smitty-48 » Tue Apr 25, 2017 2:04 pm

Short of a direct hit, which would be very difficult considering the layered above water defenses, an aicraft carrier could actually withstand all but the most extreme nuclear blasts, if it ain't Castle Bravo, then the outside might get singed, but below decks, the crew would survive and the hull would not sink, in order to reliably sink a warship with a nuke, you need an underwater detonation, because it's not the nuke which sinks the ship, the nuke creates a solid wall of water which rips the bottom out, it's the water that does the sinking, not the nuke itself.
Nec Aspera Terrent

Smitty-48
Posts: 36399
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am

Re: Aircraft Carriers Obsolete

Post by Smitty-48 » Tue Apr 25, 2017 2:30 pm

And before you say "just use a submarine", in order to sink a carrier with a submarine, you have to get in close, and the only way to really do it, is to sit on the bottom and lie in wait, you can't torpedo a carrier from stand off range, because torpedoes can either be set to go fast and short, or slow and long, if you launch slow and long, the carrier will just turn away and go to flank, and it will outrun the torpedo, so fast and short is the only way to do it, but you can't do that with a nuke, without blowing yourself up too.

Hence, the best way to nuke a carrier, would be by remote control, underwater detonation, from an assymetrical platform, which could get close without having to evade detection by sonar, but rather by hiding in plain sight.
Nec Aspera Terrent

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Aircraft Carriers Obsolete

Post by Speaker to Animals » Tue Apr 25, 2017 2:36 pm

1) Achieve air dominance over the patch of ocean in which the carrier fleet is located. If you could cause enough damage to the deck, they ain't launching planes for a while.

2) Image
Carpet bomb the whole fleet from a safe altitude.

3) Vodka.