2020 election

[PartyOf5]

What's that mean for Bernie, well, he needs a woman of color as a running mate. Who's that point to ?

Elizabeth Warren?

[Speaker to Animals]

I still can't believe they are not boosting Tulsi.

[The Conservative]

I still can't believe they are not boosting Tulsi.

Why not Michelle Obama? Hell, the left would orgasm if she put her hat into the ring.

[Speaker to Animals]

I still can't believe they are not boosting Tulsi.

Why not Michelle Obama? Hell, the left would orgasm if she put her hat into the ring.

Because Tulsi Gabbard would wipe out Trump's advantage in the middle, she would easily take a lot of Trump's base to boot, and there's really nothing he can do or say to denigrate her like he can for every other democratic candidate.

[Fife]

I still can't believe they are not boosting Tulsi.

Why not Michelle Obama? Hell, the left would orgasm if she put her hat into the ring.

Michael's business interests are best kept on the DL.

[C-Mag]

What's that mean for Bernie, well, he needs a woman of color as a running mate. Who's that point to ?

Elizabeth Warren?

Lulz, good one.

[C-Mag]

I still can't believe they are not boosting Tulsi.

Why not Michelle Obama? Hell, the left would orgasm if she put her hat into the ring.

Because Tulsi Gabbard would wipe out Trump's advantage in the middle, she would easily take a lot of Trump's base to boot, and there's really nothing he can do or say to denigrate her like he can for every other democratic candidate.

Tulsi would be his best choice. It would be a real stabilizing influence, she has the right equipment between her legs, she's an actual native American, military experience, a moderate to the Socialist.

I don't think Tulsi would do it.

What about AOC ?

[nmoore63]

Why not Michelle Obama? Hell, the left would orgasm if she put her hat into the ring.

Because Tulsi Gabbard would wipe out Trump's advantage in the middle, she would easily take a lot of Trump's base to boot, and there's really nothing he can do or say to denigrate her like he can for every other democratic candidate.

Tulsi would be his best choice. It would be a real stabilizing influence, she has the right equipment between her legs, she's an actual native American, military experience, a moderate to the Socialist.

I don't think Tulsi would do it.

What about AOC ?

AOC isn't 35.

[C-Mag]

Because Tulsi Gabbard would wipe out Trump's advantage in the middle, she would easily take a lot of Trump's base to boot, and there's really nothing he can do or say to denigrate her like he can for every other democratic candidate.

Tulsi would be his best choice. It would be a real stabilizing influence, she has the right equipment between her legs, she's an actual native American, military experience, a moderate to the Socialist.

I don't think Tulsi would do it.

What about AOC ?

AOC isn't 35.

Have you checked her long form birth certificate ?

[The Conservative]

Tulsi would be his best choice. It would be a real stabilizing influence, she has the right equipment between her legs, she's an actual native American, military experience, a moderate to the Socialist.

I don't think Tulsi would do it.

What about AOC ?

AOC isn't 35.

Have you checked her long form birth certificate ?

Just the tab she left at the last job she had...